HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization groups 2-4 breast cancers classified as positive after targeted recounts following equivocal (2+) immunohistochemistry

被引:0
|
作者
Wilcock, Diane [1 ]
Sirohi, Deepika [2 ]
Coleman, Joshua F. [1 ,3 ]
Adelhardt, Parisa [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Jong Taek [1 ,3 ]
Albertson, Daniel [1 ,3 ]
Affolter, Kajsa [1 ,3 ]
Beech, Cameron [1 ,3 ]
Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta [1 ,3 ]
Ruano, Ana L. [1 ,3 ]
Cleary, Allison S. [1 ,3 ]
Mahlow, Jonathan [1 ,3 ]
Balatico, Michael [1 ,3 ]
Gulbahce, H. Evin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] ARUP Labs, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pathol, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Utah Hlth, Huntsman Canc Inst, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
关键词
HER2; fluorescence in situ hybridization; group 2-4 breast cancers; AMERICAN SOCIETY; INTRATUMORAL HETEROGENEITY; CLINICAL ONCOLOGY/COLLEGE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GUIDELINES; EXPERIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/ajcp/aqaf006
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the correlation between the extent of (percentage of tumor cells) immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and final human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive result in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) groups 2 to 4 with equivocal (2+) IHC requiring second, blinded FISH evaluation. Methods: Breast cancer cases submitted for HER2 FISH testing with group 2 to 4 results were included. Results: Of the 2548 cases with HER2 FISH groups 2 to 4 that had HER2 IHC performed, 1104 (43.3%) (76/182 [41.8%] of group 2, 94/161 [58.4%] of group 3, 934/2205 [42.4%] of group 4) had equivocal (2+) IHC. After second blinded, IHC-guided recounts, 217 of 1104 (19.7%) (17/76 [22.4%], 75/94 [79.8%], 125/934 [13.4%] of FISH groups 2, 3, 4 with IHC 2+, respectively) had final HER2-positive status. Only 13 of 217 (6%) of the cases with HER2-positive status had more than 50% circumferential staining of the tumor targeted for rescoring. Conclusions: In over 90% of HER2 FISH group 2 to 4 breast cancers with equivocal (2+) IHC followed by targeted, blinded second FISH evaluation and final HER2-positive result, the amplified population of tumor cells was limited (<50%). Current guidelines recommend cancers having 10% to 50% of the subpopulation with amplified cells classified as having genetic heterogeneity (GH), which have a poor response to targeted therapies. Identifying these tumors as having GH and/or repeat testing may be recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detailed Reanalysis of 500 Breast Cancers With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Borderline ERBB2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results: How Reflex Testing Settles the Score
    Geiersbach, Katherine B.
    Sill, Daniel R.
    Del Rosario, Kristina M.
    Meyer, Reid G.
    Spears, Grant M.
    Yuhas, Jason A.
    Sukov, William R.
    Jenkins, Robert B.
    Ocal, Idris T.
    Mounajjed, Taofic
    Chen, Beiyun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 156 (05) : 886 - 894
  • [2] Concordance of HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Using Tissue Microarray in Breast Cancer
    Furrer, Daniela
    Jacob, Simon
    Caron, Chantal
    Sanschagrin, Francois
    Provencher, Louise
    Diorio, Caroline
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (06) : 3323 - 3329
  • [3] Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
    Bethune, Gillian C.
    Pettit, Alexandra S. L.
    van Zanten, Daniel Veldhuijzen
    Barnes, Penelope J.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (06) : 966 - 974
  • [4] Her2 amplification - Correlation of chromogenic in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Wixom, CR
    Albers, EA
    Weidner, N
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2004, 12 (03) : 248 - 251
  • [5] Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results
    Wang, Bo
    Ding, Wei
    Sun, Ke
    Wang, Xiaoling
    Xu, Liming
    Teng, Xiaodong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [6] HER2 equivocal breast cancer that is positive by alternative probe HER2 FISH are classified as HER2 negative by Oncotype DX
    Tozbikian, Gary H.
    Zynger, Debra L.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (04) : 535 - 540
  • [7] Digital imaging correlation of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma cases with HER2 genetic heterogeneity
    Wilcock, Diane M.
    Sirohi, Deepika
    Coleman, Joshua F.
    Gulbahce, H. Evin
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2022, 126 : 129 - 135
  • [9] Using Deep Learning to Predict Final HER2 Status in Invasive Breast Cancers That are Equivocal (2+) by Immunohistochemistry
    Rasmussen, Sean A. A.
    Taylor, Valerie J.
    Surette, Alexi P.
    Barnes, Penny J.
    Bethune, Gillian C.
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2022, 30 (10) : 668 - 673
  • [10] The Assessment of HER2 Gene Status by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Carcinomas With Equivocal HER2 Immunostaining: Experience From a Single Institution
    Efared, Boubacar
    Sidibe, Ibrahim S.
    Gamrani, Sana
    El Otmani, Ihsane
    Erregad, Fatimazahra
    Hammas, Nawal
    Bennis, Sanae
    Chbani, Laila
    El Fatemi, Hinde
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2018, 26 (07) : 593 - 599