The association of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration with low back pain is modified by underlying genetic propensity to pain

被引:0
作者
Suri, Pradeep [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Naeini, Maryam Kazemi [5 ]
Heagerty, Patrick J. [6 ]
Freidin, Maxim B. [5 ,7 ]
Smith, Isabelle Granville [5 ]
Elgaeva, Elizaveta E. [8 ,9 ]
Compte, Roger [5 ]
Tsepilov, Yakov A. [8 ,10 ]
Williams, Frances M. K. [5 ]
机构
[1] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Div Rehabil Care Serv, S 152 ERIC,1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle Epidemiol Res & Informat Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Clin Learning Evidence & Res CLEAR Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Kings Coll London, Sch Life Course Sci, Dept Twin Res & Genet Epidemiol, London, England
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Biol & Behav Sci, Dept Biol & Expt Psychol, London, England
[8] Inst Cytol & Genet, Lab Recombinat & Segregat Anal, Novosibirsk, Russia
[9] Novosibirsk State Univ, Dept Nat Sci, Novosibirsk, Russia
[10] Wellcome Sanger Inst, Cambridge, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Epidemiology; Genetics; Intervertebral disc; Low back pain; Patient stratification; Polygenic risk score; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Associations between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)detected lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD) and LBP are often of modest magnitude. This association may be larger in specific patient subgroups. PURPOSE: To examine whether the association between LDD and LBP is modified by underlying genetic predispositions to pain. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study in UK Biobank (UKB) and Twins UK. PATIENT SAMPLES: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the number of anatomical chronic pain locations was conducted in 347,538 UKB participants. The GWAS was used to develop a genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS) in a holdout sample of 30,000 UKB participants. The PRS model was then used in analyses of 645 TwinsUK participants with standardized LDD MRI assessments. OUTCOME MEASURES: Ever having had LBP associated with disability lasting >= 1 month (LBP1). METHODS: Using the PRS as a proxy for "genetically-predicted propensity to pain", we stratified TwinsUK participants into PRS quartiles. A "basic" model examined the association between an LDD summary score (LSUM) and LBP1, adjusting for covariates. A "fully-adjusted" model also adjusted for PRS quartile and LSUM x PRS quartile interaction terms. RESULTS: In the basic model, the odds ratio (OR) of LBP1 was 1.8 per standard deviation of LSUM (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-2.3). In the fully-adjusted model, there was a statistically significant LSUM-LBP1 association in quartile 4, the highest PRS quartile (OR=2.5 [95% CI 1.7 - 3.7], p=2.6 10-6) pound, and in quartile 3 (OR=2.0, [95% CI 1.3-3.0]; p=.002), with small-magnitude and/or nonsignificant associations in the lowest 2 PRS quartiles. PRS quartile was a significant effect modifier of the LSUM-LBP1 association (interaction p <=.05). CONCLUSIONS: Genetically-predicted propensity to pain modifies the LDD-LBP association, with the strongest association present in people with the highest genetic propensity to pain. Lumbar MRI findings may have stronger connections to LBP in specific subgroups of people. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 17
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Tutorial: Power Analyses for Interaction Effects in Cross-Sectional Regressions
    Baranger, David A. A.
    Finsaas, Megan C.
    Goldstein, Brandon L.
    Vize, Colin E.
    Lynam, Donald R.
    Olino, Thomas M.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 6 (03)
  • [2] Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations
    Brinjikji, W.
    Luetmer, P. H.
    Comstock, B.
    Bresnahan, B. W.
    Chen, L. E.
    Deyo, R. A.
    Halabi, S.
    Turner, J. A.
    Avins, A. L.
    James, K.
    Wald, J. T.
    Kallmes, D. F.
    Jarvik, J. G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (04) : 811 - 816
  • [3] Bycroft C., bioRxiv
  • [4] Tutorial: a guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses
    Choi, Shing Wan
    Mak, Timothy Shin-Heng
    O'Reilly, Paul F.
    [J]. NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2020, 15 (09) : 2759 - 2772
  • [5] PRSice-2: Polygenic Risk Score software for biobank-scale data
    Choi, Shing Wan
    O'Reilly, Paul F.
    [J]. GIGASCIENCE, 2019, 8 (07):
  • [6] Degenerative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain A Systematic Review
    Chou, Dean
    Samartzis, Dino
    Bellabarba, Carlo
    Patel, Alpesh
    Luk, Keith D. K.
    Kisser, Jeannette M. Schenk
    Skelly, Andrea C.
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (21) : S43 - S53
  • [7] The Association Between Lumbar Disc Degeneration and Low Back Pain The Influence of Age, Gender, and Individual Radiographic Features
    de Schepper, Evelien I. T.
    Damen, Jurgen
    van Meurs, Joyce B. J.
    Ginai, Abida Z.
    Popham, Maria
    Hofman, Albert
    Koes, Bart W.
    Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M.
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (05) : 531 - 536
  • [8] An exploratory study of different definitions and thresholds for lumbar disc degeneration assessed by MRI and their associations with low back pain using data from a cohort study of a general population
    Dragsbaek, Line
    Kjaer, Per
    Hancock, Mark
    Jensen, Tue Secher
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Follow-up Assessment of Sciatica
    el Barzouhi, Abdelilah
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A. M.
    Nijeholt, Geert J. Lycklama A.
    Van der Kallen, Bas F.
    van den Hout, Wilbert B.
    Jacobs, Wilco C. H.
    Koes, Bart W.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (11) : 999 - 1007
  • [10] Potential of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings to Refine Case Definition for Mechanical Low Back Pain in Epidemiological Studies A Systematic Review
    Endean, Alison
    Palmer, Keith T.
    Coggon, David
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (02) : 160 - 169