Study on thermal and physiological responses during summer while moving between academic buildings under different walking conditions

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Jiahao [1 ]
Li, Haiyan [2 ]
Fang, Zhaosong [3 ]
Li, Yongcai [1 ]
Lu, Fangqi [1 ]
Guo, Tongye [3 ]
Zhang, Xiang [4 ]
Lin, Chang [5 ]
Lu, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Climate & Agrometeorol Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Life Sci, Strateg Landscape Planning & Management, Emil Ramann Str 6, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[5] Guangzhou Acad Fine Arts, Innovat Sch Great Bay Area, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Outdoor thermal comfort; Physiological indicators; Thermal index; Sunlight exposure; Walking speed; URBAN HEAT-ISLAND; MITIGATION STRATEGIES; MORTALITY; COMFORT; HEALTH; VULNERABILITY; TEMPERATURES; ASSOCIATIONS; MICROCLIMATE; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.csite.2025.105809
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
During the hot summer season, students walking through corridors connecting academic buildings may experience brief periods of dynamic sunlight exposure, which could have some impact on their thermal sensation and physiological responses. However, there is limited research focusing on short outdoor walking between different buildings for individuals. Therefore, we conducted a field survey on a university campus in Guangzhou, China, collecting 1199 questionnaires along with corresponding thermal environment parameters and physiological indicators. Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) was employed to assess thermal comfort, and a comprehensive improvement model was developed by integrating both actual thermal comfort models and simulation-based prediction models. The findings are as follows: (1) Subjects exposed to short-term sunlight showed an average HR (heart rate) increase of 3.4 beats/min (0.8 m/s), 3.9 beats/min (1.2 m/s), and 4.2 beats/min (1.6 m/s) compared to non-exposed individuals; the maximum Tac (auditory canal temperature) difference was 0.15 degrees C, and the maximum differences in metabolic rate and heat storage were 14.8 W/m2 and 12.2 W/m2, respectively; (2) Walking speeds should be kept below 2.09 m/s (non-exposed) and 1.53 m/s (expose) to avoid heat risks; (3) There is a discrepancy between the simulated and actual thermal indices. These findings provide valuable insights for helping pedestrians mitigate heat risks and optimize outdoor spaces of buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] A study of occupant performance under varying indoor thermal conditions during summer in India
    Sharma, Virendra
    Gupta, Raj
    Mathur, Jyotirmay
    Mathur, Sanjay
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2025, 333
  • [2] Experimental Comparative Study between Conventional and Green Parking Lots: Analysis of Subsurface Thermal Behavior under Warm and Dry Summer Conditions
    Bouzouidja, Ryad
    Leconte, Francois
    Kiss, Marton
    Pierret, Margaux
    Pruvot, Christelle
    Detriche, Sebastien
    Louvel, Brice
    Bertout, Julie
    Aketouane, Zakaria
    Wu, Tingting Vogt
    Goiffon, Remy
    Colin, Baptiste
    Petrissans, Anelie
    Lagiere, Philippe
    Petrissans, Mathieu
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (08)
  • [3] Experimental Study on Occupant's Thermal Responses under the Non-uniform Conditions in Vehicle Cabin during the Heating Period
    Zhang Wencan
    Chen Jiqing
    Lan Fengchong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 27 (02) : 331 - 339