Outcomes of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Symptoms: A Prospective Single-Center Study

被引:0
|
作者
Delazar, Sina [1 ]
Azadnajafabad, Sina [1 ,2 ]
Firouznia, Kavous [1 ]
Nowroozi, Mohammad Reza [3 ]
Amini, Erfan [3 ]
Fotouhi, Maryam [4 ]
Ghanaati, Hossein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Imam Khomeini Hosp, Adv Diagnost & Intervent Radiol Res Ctr ADIR, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Surg, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Urooncol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Canc Inst Iran, Canc Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
benign prostate hyperplasia; complication; interventional radiology; outcome; prostate artery embolization; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; MODERATE; SAFETY; VOLUME; SCORE; MEN;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.70565
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background and AimsBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is among the most common urologic conditions in elderly men, presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is a recent interventional treatment for BPH. MethodsThis prospective single-center study reviewed the results of cases that underwent PAE for BPH from 2020 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were men with BPH refractory to pharmacologic treatment or those experiencing persistent adverse effects from medications, who were not candidates for surgical management. Assessments were made using ultrasonography for prostate volume and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) before and at 3 and 12 months after PAE. The clinical success rate of PAE was assessed according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe Standards of Practice. Recurrence of symptoms and complications after PAE were also recorded. ResultsFrom a total of 46 included patients, clinical success was achieved in 93% at 3 months and 85% at 12 months. Complications occurred in eight (17.4%) cases, including five cases of erectile dysfunction and three cases of urinary tract infection. Eight (17.4%) cases had recurrent symptoms and required pharmacologic treatment, while seven (15.2%) needed surgery. The IPSS score dropped significantly at 3 months, with a mean difference of -16.2 (95% CI: -17.7 to -14.8) (p < 0.001), and at 12 months after PAE, with a mean difference of -13.5 (95% CI: -15.9 to -11.1) (p < 0.001). Prostate volume decreased significantly at 3 months, with a mean difference of -36.0 (95% CI: -43.0 to -29.0) (p < 0.001), and at 12 months, with a mean difference of -37.3 (95% CI: -43.7 to -31.0) (p < 0.001). ConclusionThe findings of this study indicate that PAE is an effective therapeutic approach for patients with BPH, demonstrated by the low rates of adverse events and the absence of major complications.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostatic artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia in men ≥75 years: a prospective single-center study
    Wang, Mao Qiang
    Wang, Yan
    Yan, Jie Yu
    Yuan, Kai
    Zhang, Guo Dong
    Duan, Feng
    Li, Kai
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (09) : 1275 - 1283
  • [2] Prostatic artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia in men ≥75 years: a prospective single-center study
    Mao Qiang Wang
    Yan Wang
    Jie Yu Yan
    Kai Yuan
    Guo Dong Zhang
    Feng Duan
    Kai Li
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 1275 - 1283
  • [3] Prostatic Artery Embolization for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Patients with Prostates &gt; 90 g: A Prospective Single-Center Study
    de Assis, Andre Moreira
    Moreira, Airton Mota
    de Paula Rodrigues, Vanessa Cristina
    Yoshinaga, Eduardo Muracca
    Antunes, Alberto Azoubel
    Harward, Sardis Honoria
    Srougi, Miguel
    Carnevale, Francisco Cesar
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [4] Prostatic Artery Embolization in Nonindex Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients: Single-center Outcomes for Urinary Retention and Gross Prostatic Hematuria
    Ayyagari, Raj
    Powell, Taylor
    Staib, Lawrence
    Chapiro, Julius
    Perez-Lozada, Juan-Carlos
    Bhatia, Shivank
    Chai, Toby
    Schoenberger, Steven
    Devito, Ralph
    UROLOGY, 2020, 136 : 212 - 217
  • [5] Re: Prostatic Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men ≥75 Years: A Prospective Single-Center Study
    Griebling, Tomas L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (01): : 11 - 12
  • [6] Clinical Outcomes of Prostatic Artery Embolization in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Clinical Study
    Dogan, Kazim
    Erbagci, Ahmet
    Sen, Haluk
    Kervancioglu, Selim
    Erturhan, Mehmet Sakip
    Seckiner, Ilker
    Bayrak, Omer
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 48 (03): : 215 - 221
  • [7] Clinical evaluation of embolization of the superior vesical prostatic artery for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center retrospective study
    Qiu, Zhilei
    Zhang, Changcun
    Wang, Xinsheng
    Cheng, Kai
    Liang, Xin
    Wang, Dawen
    Hou, Sichuan
    Wang, Xinsheng
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2017, 12 (04) : 409 - 416
  • [8] Prostatic artery embolization in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review
    Teoh, Jeremy Y. C.
    Chiu, Peter K. F.
    Yee, Chi-Hang
    Wong, Hon-Ming
    Chan, Chi-Kwok
    Chan, Eddie S. Y.
    Hou, Simon S. M.
    Ng, Chi-Fai
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 49 (02) : 197 - 203
  • [9] Prostatic artery embolization in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review
    Jeremy Y. C. Teoh
    Peter K. F. Chiu
    Chi-Hang Yee
    Hon-Ming Wong
    Chi-Kwok Chan
    Eddie S. Y. Chan
    Simon S. M. Hou
    Chi-Fai Ng
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2017, 49 : 197 - 203
  • [10] Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms as a result of large benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective single-center investigation
    Wang, Maoqiang
    Guo, Liping
    Duan, Feng
    Yuan, Kai
    Zhang, Guodong
    Li, Kai
    Yan, Jieyu
    Wang, Yan
    Kang, Haiyan
    Wang, Zhijun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (08) : 766 - 772