What do safety and risk mean to women who choose to birth at home? A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Chauncy, Candice [1 ,2 ]
Dawson, Kate [2 ]
Bayes, Sara [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Joan Kirner Womens & Childrens Hosp, St Albans, Australia
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Fitzroy, Australia
[3] Edith Cowen Univ, Perth, Australia
[4] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Murdoch, Australia
关键词
Homebirth; Decision-making; Safety; Risk; women's views; PLANNED HOSPITAL BIRTHS; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; DECISION-MAKING; HOMEBIRTH; PLACE; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; EMPOWERMENT; CHILDBIRTH; REFLEXIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.midw.2025.104340
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite clear evidence to support the safety and efficacy of homebirth, the concept challenges the almost universal belief that hospital is the safest place to give birth. Homebirth remains largely unsupported around the world due to prevailing beliefs and constructs surrounding risk and safety. Despite barriers to access, women continue to choose home as a place to birth. Methods: A systematic review of qualitative research was conducted to explore and understand women's views on what constitutes risk and safety in labour and birth for those who choose to birth at home. All studies were evaluated for quality and relevance. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Analysis of the 29 papers included in this review identified three main themes: risk of hospital birth, risk of homebirth, and safety of homebirth, and convey that women who choose to birth at home view their social, emotional, psychological and spiritual safety as highly important, with homebirth protecting and respecting these factors. For the women in the studies we reviewed, physical safety was enhanced through having the expertise of a midwife present at their birth. Participants considered the cultural paradigm within hospital services to focus on care for the physical body and not the whole person, which had the potential to cause psychological and physical harm. Discussion: This review demonstrated that women who choose to birth at home assess risk and safety differently to the way health care institutions assess these parameters. These findings will be of interest to maternity services and educators of maternity care practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Global stakeholder perspectives of home birth: a systematic scoping review
    Ginny Brunton
    Samira Wahab
    Hassan Sheikh
    Beth Murray Davis
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [32] How do social discourses of risk impact on women's choices for vaginal breech birth? A qualitative study of women's experiences
    Petrovska, Karolina
    Watts, Nicole
    Sheehan, Athena
    Bisits, Andrew
    Homer, Caroline
    HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2017, 19 (1-2) : 19 - 37
  • [33] What characterizes women who want to give birth as naturally as possible without painkillers or intervention?
    Kringeland, Tone
    Daltveit, Anne Kjersti
    Moller, Anders
    SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2010, 1 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [34] Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders
    Alice Yuen Loke
    Louise Davies
    Yim-wah Mak
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19
  • [35] Safety and effectiveness of hormonal contraception for women who use opioids: A systematic review
    Ti, Angeline
    Stone, Rebecca H.
    Whiteman, Maura
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 100 (06) : 480 - 483
  • [36] What influences contraceptive behaviour in women who experience unintended pregnancy? A systematic review of qualitative research
    Pratt, R.
    Stephenson, J.
    Mann, S.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 34 (08) : 693 - 699
  • [37] Satisfaction Outcomes in Women Who "Choose to Go Flat" After Mastectomy An Integrative Review
    Tyner, Tracy E.
    Lee, Mikyoung A.
    ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 2021, 44 (01) : 31 - 51
  • [38] Organizational strategies to optimize women's safety during labor and birth: A scoping review
    McCormick, Margaret
    Pollock, Wendy
    Kapp, Suzanne
    Gerdtz, Marie
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2021, 48 (03): : 285 - 300
  • [39] How do midwives facilitate women to give birth during physiological second stage of labour? A systematic review
    Healy, Maria
    Nyman, Viola
    Spence, Dale
    Otten, Rene H. J.
    Verhoeven, Corine J.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [40] What do women in Australia want from their maternity care: A scoping review
    Faktor, Lachlan
    Small, Kirsten
    Bradfield, Zoe
    Baird, Kathleen
    Fenwick, Jennifer
    Gray, Joanne E.
    Robinson, Melanie
    Warton, Chanelle
    Cusack, Sally
    Homer, Caroline S. E.
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2024, 37 (02) : 278 - 287