How Do Cognitive Proximity and Knowledge Space Position Affect Firms' Innovation? Evidence From Micro and Small Manufacturing Firms in South Africa

被引:1
作者
Galetti, Jefferson R. B. [1 ,2 ]
Tregenna, Fiona [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Galway, JE Cairnes Sch Business & Econ, Galway, Ireland
[2] Univ Johannesburg, Coll Business & Econ, DSI NRF South African Res Chair Ind Dev, Johannesburg, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
cognitive proximity; innovation; knowledge space; micro and small enterprises (MSEs); South Africa; METROPOLITAN-AREAS; RELATEDNESS; DISTANCE; EXTERNALITIES; COMBINATIONS; EMPLOYMENT; DIFFUSION; MARSHALL; VARIETY; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1111/grow.70021
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Cognitive proximity between firms, and their position in relation to other firms in a knowledge space, can influence firms' innovation performance. While some studies have begun analysing this in developing countries, there is a dearth of evidence in Africa, and more generally for small and especially micro enterprises as well as for informal enterprises. To fill this gap, we utilise rich new survey data covering 711 micro and small manufacturing firms in Johannesburg, South Africa. We develop and apply a novel multidimensional measure of cognitive proximity, using information on the skills most needed in firms' activities, firms' proximity in an industrial space, and the types of external co-operation in which they engage. We find that cognitive proximity is positively associated with innovation outcomes. Although this relationship is increasing for most of the sample, there is evidence of an inverted-U relationship for firms located at higher percentiles, suggesting that too much proximity may lead to a cognitive lock-in. Firms' knowledge space position is also associated with differential innovation outcomes. In extensions of the model, we find interesting differences in how both cognitive proximity and knowledge space positions are associated with the degree of innovation novelty and also vary according to whether the firm is formal or informal.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
ACS ZJ, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P678
[2]   Knowledge exchange and innovation in clusters: a dynamic social network analysis [J].
Alberti, Fernando G. ;
Belfanti, Federica ;
Giusti, Jessica D. .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2021, 28 (07) :880-901
[3]   Small business innovation: firm level evidence from Sweden [J].
Andersson, Martin ;
LooF, Hans .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2012, 37 (05) :732-754
[4]  
Andreoni A., 2021, STRUCTURAL TRANSFORM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OSLO MANUAL 2018 GUI, VCuarta, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264304604-EN, 10.1787/a041f4ef-en, DOI 10.1787/A041F4EF-EN]
[6]   Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation [J].
Bathelt, H ;
Malmberg, A ;
Maskell, P .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2004, 28 (01) :31-56
[7]   Local Innovation Networking Dynamics: Evidence from South Africa [J].
Booyens, Irma ;
Hart, Tim G. B. ;
Ramoroka, Kgabo H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2018, 30 (04) :749-767
[8]   Are small, medium- and micro-sized enterprises engines of innovation? The reality in South Africa [J].
Booyens, Irma .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 38 (01) :67-78
[9]   Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment [J].
Boschma, RA .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (01) :61-74
[10]   Relatedness and technological change in cities: the rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010 [J].
Boschma, Ron ;
Balland, Pierre-Alexandre ;
Kogler, Dieter Franz .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2015, 24 (01) :223-250