PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF PSO, HGSO, AND DE OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR COMPUTATION OF DIRECTIONAL OVERCURRENT RELAY COORDINATION IN POWER SYSTEMS

被引:0
作者
Nidhi, R. [1 ]
Roy, Biman Kumar Saha [1 ]
Saha, Debasree [2 ]
Mukherjee, Manas [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Durgapur, Dept Elect Engn, Durgapur, W Bengal, India
[2] Guru Nanak Inst Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
关键词
Directional Overcurrent Relays; Optimization techniques; Particle Swarm Optimization; Henry Gas Solubility Optimization; Differential Evolution; Protection Coordination Problem; OPTIMAL PROTECTION COORDINATION; MESHED DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.30765/er.2429
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Directional over current relays (DOCRs) have been in use for ensuring the complete protection of the power system network. However, the modern power system is getting complex with the increased penetration of Renewable Energy Source (RES) based distributed generators (DGs), as the current flow become bidirectional. Hence, the system demands faster operation of the protection devices to prevent any major outages. Optimal values of all the DOCR settings viz, TDS and Ip need to be found out such as to minimize the overall time of operation of all the relays in the network. This study focuses on the comparative study of the optimization problem carried out using the prominent optimization algorithms - Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Henry Gas Solubility Optimization (HGSO) and Differential Evolution (DE). The ability of techniques is established on IEEE 6 - bus & WSCC 9 - bus test systems for mid-point line faults. The Protection Coordination Problem (PCP) is formulated as non-linear programming (NLP) problem, and the optimal settings of the relays TDS and Ip are achieved using MATLAB R2021a platform and validated the results in POWER WORLD simulator software. The results depict that the HGSO method shows a significant reduction in relays' time of operation compared to PSO, but DE gives superior results compared to other techniques with a minimum computational time.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 86
页数:18
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Abeid Salima, 2020, 15 INT C DEV POW SYS
  • [2] A new optimal approach for coordination of overcurrent relays in interconnected power systems
    Abyaneh, HA
    Al-Dabbagh, M
    Karegar, HK
    Sadeghi, SHH
    Khan, RAJ
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2003, 18 (02) : 430 - 435
  • [3] Discussion on "Optimal Protection Coordination for Meshed Distribution Systems With DG Using Dual Setting Relays"
    Aghdam, Tohid Soleymani
    Karegar, Hossein Kazemi
    Abbasi, Ali
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2016, 7 (03) : 1756 - 1756
  • [4] Agrawal A, 2016, 2016 NATIONAL POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (NPSC)
  • [5] Antonova Galina, 2012, 2012 65 ANN C PROT R
  • [6] An on-line relay coordination algorithm for adaptive protection using linear programming technique
    Chattopadhyay, B
    Sachdev, MS
    Sidhu, TS
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 1996, 11 (01) : 165 - 173
  • [7] Henry gas solubility optimization: A novel physics-based algorithm
    Hashim, Fatma A.
    Houssein, Essam H.
    Mabrouk, Mai S.
    Al-Atabany, Walid
    Mirjalili, Seyedali
    [J]. FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2019, 101 : 646 - 667
  • [8] User-Defined Dual Setting Directional Overcurrent Relays with Hybrid Time Current-Voltage Characteristics-Based Protection Coordination for Active Distribution Network
    Hong, Lucheng
    Rizwan, Mian
    Wasif, Muhammad
    Ahmad, Shafiq
    Zaindin, Mazen
    Firdausi, Muhammad
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 62752 - 62769
  • [9] Non-communication protection method for meshed and radial distribution networks with synchronous-based DG
    Jamali, Sadegh
    Borhani-Bahabadi, Hossein
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2017, 93 : 468 - 478
  • [10] Recloser time-current-voltage characteristic for fuse saving in distribution networks with DG
    Jamali, Sadegh
    Borhani-Bahabadi, Hossein
    [J]. IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2017, 11 (01) : 272 - 279