Position paper: public policy implications in publicly funded infrastructure projects

被引:1
作者
Al Naqbi, Khalid Khalfan Mohamed [1 ]
Ojiako, Udechukwu [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Al-Mhdawi, M. K. S. [5 ,6 ]
Chipulu, Maxwell [7 ]
Dweiri, Fikri T. [1 ]
Bashir, Hamdi [1 ]
AlRaeesi, Eman Jasim Hussain [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Univ Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[4] Univ Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
[5] Teesside Univ, Middlesbrough, England
[6] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
Infrastructure projects; Public policy; Legal perspectives; Rule of law; Justice; SOCIAL IMPACTS; LAW; INSTRUMENTS; INVESTMENT; MANAGEMENT; JUSTICE; LEGAL; GOVERNANCE; FAIRNESS; RULE;
D O I
10.1108/SASBE-06-2024-0225
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose - This essay contributes to the ongoing exposition of a project management-focused understanding of "public policy" implementation. Distinct from previous studies that take a predominantly administrative sciences perspective, the delivery and implementation of publicly funded infrastructure projects as an instrument of public policy is explored through the lens of legal frameworks. Design/methodology/approach - We adopt the explanation-building review approach to provide descriptions and explanations of the relevant enablers and context necessary for the successful delivery and implementation of publicly funded infrastructure projects. Findings - The ambiguity associated with public policy is more likely to hinder than facilitate the use of publicly funded infrastructure projects as preferred instruments of choice for implementing public policy. Originality/value - Despite substantial interest among academics and practitioners in utilising projects as tools for public policy implementation, thorough discussions on the legal complexities inherent in these projects remain scarce.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 129 条
  • [1] The Sociological Ambivalence of Bureaucracy: From Weber via Gouldner to Marx
    Adler, Paul S.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (01) : 244 - 266
  • [2] Examination of Legal Perspective of Public Policy Implementation on Construction Projects Arbitration
    AlRaeesi, Eman Jasim Hussain
    Ojiako, Udechukwu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 13 (03)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, National Infrastructure Strategy
  • [4] Association for Project Management (APM), 2022, What is project management
  • [5] Atkinson R., 1999, Int J Proj Manag, V17, P337, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6, 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6]
  • [6] Bacchi C., 2000, Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, V21, P45, DOI DOI 10.1080/01596300050005493
  • [7] Barth T.J., 1992, American Review Of Public Administration, V22, P289, DOI DOI 10.1177/027507409202200403
  • [8] The analysis of information flow interdependencies within projects
    Bashir, Hamdi
    Ojiako, Udechukwu
    Marshall, Alasdair
    Chipulu, Maxwell
    Yousif, Amer A.
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2022, 33 (01) : 20 - 36
  • [9] Judiciary's Use of the Critical Path Method to Resolve Construction Claims
    Bayraktar, Mehmet Emre
    Arif, Farrukh
    Hastak, Makarand
    Gad, Nagy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 4 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [10] Besner C., 2006, PROJ MANAG J, V37, P37, DOI DOI 10.1177/875697280603700305