Preferences of Cancer Survivors and Healthcare Providers for a Physical Activity Application: A Group Concept Mapping Study

被引:0
|
作者
Tack, Emma [1 ,2 ]
Braun, Maya [1 ,3 ]
De Groef, An [2 ,4 ]
Dams, Lore [2 ,5 ]
De Backere, Femke [6 ]
Van Overbeke, Marthe [1 ,2 ]
Crombez, Geert [1 ]
De Paepe, Annick L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Expt Clin & Hlth Psychol, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy, MOVANT Res Grp, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Implementat Sci Healthcare, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Leuven, Dept Rehabil Sci, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Leuven, Belgium
[6] Univ Ghent, Dept Informat Technol, IDLab, IMEC, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
cancer survivors; healthcare providers; mHealth; mixed-method; physical activity; psycho-oncology; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LONG-TERM; INTERVENTION; EXERCISE; BREAST; PROSTATE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1002/pon.70144
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may help increase physical activity (PA) in diverse groups, including cancer survivors (CSs). Developing an intervention requires a needs assessment of stakeholders, focusing on the preferred features of the application from the perspectives of both CSs and healthcare providers (HCPs). Methods: Group concept mapping was used for this assessment. A first group of stakeholders (CSs: n = 14; HCPs: n = 12) brainstormed and generated statements about preferred app features. A second group (CSs: n = 16; HCPs: n = 23) sorted these statements into thematic clusters and rated their importance. The sorting data was combined, and (dis)similarity matrices were generated through multidimensional scaling. Rating data was aggregated for the overall group and the subgroups (CSs and HCPs) at both the cluster and the statement level. Results: The first phase resulted in 133 statements, which were reduced to 77 distinct preferred features. Analysis of the sorting data in phase two resulted in six clusters, which were labeled: (1) "Information & Social Support," (2) "Encouragement," (3) "Practical Use," (4) "Self-Monitoring & Feedback," (5) "Planning & Goals," and (6) "Personalization." Both groups rated "Planning & Goals" and "Personalization" as most important. CSs considered the "Encouragement" cluster as least important, whereas HCPs rated "Information & Social Support" the lowest. Conclusions: These insights can guide the development of interventions to promote a physically active lifestyle among CSs. Applications should prioritize goal setting, planning, and personalization to enhance user engagement. Diverse functionalities with user-friendly navigation are essential. Both stakeholder groups showed similar preferences, reflecting a shared vision for intervention development.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Healthcare providers' discussions of physical activity with older survivors of cancer: Potential missed opportunities for health promotion
    Siembida, Elizabeth J.
    Kent, Erin E.
    Bellizzi, Keith M.
    Smith, Ashley Wilder
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 11 (03) : 437 - 443
  • [2] Diet and physical activity intervention in colorectal cancer survivors: A feasibility study
    Grimmett, Chloe
    Simon, Alice
    Lawson, Victoria
    Wardle, Jane
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2015, 19 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [3] Breast cancer survivors' preferences for mHealth physical activity interventions: findings from a mixed methods study
    Phillips, Siobhan M.
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    Welch, Whitney A.
    Gavin, Kara L.
    Cottrell, Alison
    Nielsen, Anne
    Solk, Payton
    Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle
    Cella, David
    Ackermann, Ronald T.
    Spring, Bonnie
    Penedo, Frank
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2019, 13 (02) : 292 - 305
  • [4] Psychological correlates of physical activity and exercise preferences in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan cancer survivors
    Maxwell-Smith, Chloe
    Hagger, Martin S.
    Kane, Robert
    Cohen, Paul A.
    Tan, Jason
    Platell, Cameron
    Makin, Gregory Bryan
    Saunders, Christobel
    Nightingale, Sophie
    Lynch, Craig
    Sardelic, Frank
    McCormick, Jacob
    Hardcastle, Sarah J.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 (02) : 221 - 230
  • [5] Physical activity preferences of ovarian cancer survivors
    Stevinson, Clare
    Capstick, Valerie
    Schepansky, Alexandra
    Tonkin, Katia
    Vallance, Jeffrey K.
    Ladha, Aliya B.
    Steed, Helen
    Faught, Wylam
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (04) : 422 - 428
  • [6] The Physical Activity Preferences of Gynecologic Cancer Survivors
    Tyrrell, Ashley
    Keats, Melanie
    Blanchard, Chris
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2014, 41 (05) : 461 - 469
  • [7] Preferences and engagement with physical activity resources among cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Bastas, Denise
    Tabaczynski, Allyson
    Whitehorn, Alexis
    Trinh, Linda
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2023, 31 (07)
  • [8] Measurement of physical activity in cancer survivors: a validity study
    Su, Ching-Ching
    Lee, Kuan-Der
    Yeh, Chung-Hung
    Kao, Ching-Chiu
    Lin, Chia-Chin
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2014, 8 (02) : 205 - 212
  • [9] Healthcare providers' promotion of physical activity among child and adolescent cancer survivors: strategies and challenges
    Shabanian, Julia
    Capaldi, Jessica M.
    Luna-Lupercio, Bianca
    Finster, Laurel J.
    Noskoff, Kara
    Gan, Hilary
    Davies, Simon
    Whiteway, Susan L.
    Shirazipour, Celina H.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2023, 17 (06) : 1546 - 1560
  • [10] Pancreatic cancer survivors' preferences, barriers, and facilitators related to physical activity and diet interventions
    Arthur, Anna E.
    Delk, Ashley
    Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
    Christein, John D.
    Contreras, Carlo
    Posey, James A., III
    Vickers, Selwyn
    Oster, Robert
    Rogers, Laura Q.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2016, 10 (06) : 981 - 989