External cephalic version in nonvertex second twin-Success rate, mode of delivery, and safety: A systematic review

被引:1
作者
Dymon, Milosz [1 ]
Ciebiera, Michal [2 ]
Zgliczynska, Magdalena [3 ]
Siergiej, Malgorzata [1 ]
Kociuba, Jakub [2 ]
Szajnik, Marta [1 ]
机构
[1] Lazarski Univ, Fac Med, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Ctr Postgrad Med Educ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 2, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Ctr Postgrad Med, Dept Obstet Perinatol & Neonatol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
external cephalic version; nonvertex; second twin; twins; CESAREAN-SECTION; MANAGEMENT; VERTEX; BIRTH; TERM; MORBIDITY; TRIAL; DEATH; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.15006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionOne of the key challenges regarding the management of twins involves choosing the optimal mode of delivery, which is strongly influenced by the final presentation of both fetuses. In cases of vertex-nonvertex pregnancies attempting the trial of vaginal delivery, external cephalic version (ECV) is one of possible management options. The main objective of this review was to collect and summarize available data in terms of the application of ECV in the population of nonvertex second twins.Material and MethodsUsing the PRISMA guidelines, we searched for original, English-language studies investigating ECV in nonvertex second twins. The PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and COCHRANE databases were searched until May 2024. Reviews, case reports, editorials, and conference papers were excluded from further analysis. Out of 260 papers retrieved, 10 were subjected to the final analysis in terms of success rates, modes of delivery, and adverse outcomes.ResultsThe total number of ECVs was 289, with an overall success rate of 64.4%. In the group of successful versions, vertex vaginal delivery was achieved in 171 cases (91.9%). The incidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes was low.ConclusionsThe purpose of this review was to consolidate and update the current knowledge regarding ECV in nonvertex second twins. Based on the results of this series of studies, ECV appears to be a reasonable management option. However, it is important to highlight several significant limitations. The primary concern is the lack of recent research in this field over the past three decades, with the most recent study in our review being published in 1998. Furthermore, the actual number of studies addressing this topic is relatively low, characterized by a retrospective nature and questionable methodologies. These limitations make it challenging to draw definitive conclusions for clinical practice. This is an important message for our community, emphasizing the need for further studies in this area, particularly randomized controlled trials, to evaluate the safety and success rate of vaginal twin delivery after ECV when the second twin presents in a nonvertex position.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 590
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Mode of Delivery Following Successful External Cephalic Version: Comparison With Spontaneous Cephalic Presentations at Delivery [J].
Kuppens, Simone M. I. ;
Hutton, Eileen K. ;
Hasaart, Tom H. M. ;
Aichi, Nassira ;
Wijnen, Henrica A. ;
Pop, Victor J. M. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2013, 35 (10) :883-888
[22]   Association between hospitals' cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation and their success rates for external cephalic version [J].
Athiel, Yoann ;
Girault, Aude ;
Le Ray, Camille ;
Goffinet, Francois .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 270 :156-163
[23]   Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery [J].
Salzer, Liat ;
Nagar, Ran ;
Melamed, Nir ;
Wiznitzer, Arnon ;
Peled, Yoav ;
Yogev, Yariv .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (01) :49-54
[24]   Effect of anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: GRADE- assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Lei, Liming ;
Fang, Zhiyong ;
Xu, Chenyang ;
Wang, Zhaohui ;
Li, Hui ;
Ma, Li .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
[25]   Effectiveness of nifedipine tocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review [J].
Wilcox, C. B. ;
Nassar, N. ;
Roberts, C. L. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) :423-428
[26]   Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review [J].
Rosman, Ageeth N. ;
Guijt, Aline ;
Vlemmix, Floortje ;
Rijnders, Marlies ;
Mol, Ben W. J. ;
Kok, Marjolein .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (02) :137-142
[27]   Outcome of External Cephalic Version in Terms of Success Rate and Fetomaternal Complications [J].
Arif, W. ;
Iqbal, M. ;
Lodhi, S. K. .
ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2010, 16 (01) :64-68
[28]   Impact of a simulator-based training program on the success rate of external cephalic version [J].
Pinto, Luisa ;
Paulo-de-Sousa, Catarina ;
Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 301 :60-63
[29]   Effectiveness of nitrous oxide in external cephalic version on success rate: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Dochez, Vincent ;
Esbelin, Julie ;
Misbert, Emilie ;
Arthuis, Chloe ;
Drouard, Anne ;
Badon, Virginie ;
Fenet, Olivier ;
Thubert, Thibault ;
Winer, Norbert .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (03) :391-398
[30]   MODE OF DELIVERY FOLLOWING EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AND INDUCTION OF LABOR AT TERM [J].
MEGORY, E ;
OHEL, G ;
FISHER, O ;
RUACH, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1995, 12 (06) :404-406