External cephalic version in nonvertex second twin-Success rate, mode of delivery, and safety: A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Dymon, Milosz [1 ]
Ciebiera, Michal [2 ]
Zgliczynska, Magdalena [3 ]
Siergiej, Malgorzata [1 ]
Kociuba, Jakub [2 ]
Szajnik, Marta [1 ]
机构
[1] Lazarski Univ, Fac Med, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Ctr Postgrad Med Educ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 2, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Ctr Postgrad Med, Dept Obstet Perinatol & Neonatol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
external cephalic version; nonvertex; second twin; twins; CESAREAN-SECTION; MANAGEMENT; VERTEX; BIRTH; TERM; MORBIDITY; TRIAL; DEATH; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.15006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionOne of the key challenges regarding the management of twins involves choosing the optimal mode of delivery, which is strongly influenced by the final presentation of both fetuses. In cases of vertex-nonvertex pregnancies attempting the trial of vaginal delivery, external cephalic version (ECV) is one of possible management options. The main objective of this review was to collect and summarize available data in terms of the application of ECV in the population of nonvertex second twins.Material and MethodsUsing the PRISMA guidelines, we searched for original, English-language studies investigating ECV in nonvertex second twins. The PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and COCHRANE databases were searched until May 2024. Reviews, case reports, editorials, and conference papers were excluded from further analysis. Out of 260 papers retrieved, 10 were subjected to the final analysis in terms of success rates, modes of delivery, and adverse outcomes.ResultsThe total number of ECVs was 289, with an overall success rate of 64.4%. In the group of successful versions, vertex vaginal delivery was achieved in 171 cases (91.9%). The incidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes was low.ConclusionsThe purpose of this review was to consolidate and update the current knowledge regarding ECV in nonvertex second twins. Based on the results of this series of studies, ECV appears to be a reasonable management option. However, it is important to highlight several significant limitations. The primary concern is the lack of recent research in this field over the past three decades, with the most recent study in our review being published in 1998. Furthermore, the actual number of studies addressing this topic is relatively low, characterized by a retrospective nature and questionable methodologies. These limitations make it challenging to draw definitive conclusions for clinical practice. This is an important message for our community, emphasizing the need for further studies in this area, particularly randomized controlled trials, to evaluate the safety and success rate of vaginal twin delivery after ECV when the second twin presents in a nonvertex position.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 590
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DELIVERY OF THE NONVERTEX 2ND TWIN - BREECH EXTRACTION VERSUS EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION
    CHAUHAN, SP
    ROBERTS, WE
    MCLAREN, RA
    ROACH, H
    MORRISON, JC
    MARTIN, JN
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (04) : 1015 - 1020
  • [2] External cephalic version of the non-cephalic presenting twin: a systematic review
    Felder, Laura
    McCurdy, Rebekah
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (09): : 1712 - 1718
  • [3] External Cephalic Version With Salbutamol - Success Rate and Predictors of Success
    Tasnim, Nasira
    Mahmud, Ghazala
    Khurshid, Mona
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2009, 19 (02): : 91 - 94
  • [4] Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version after a previous caesarean delivery: A systematic review
    Zhang, Ning
    Ward, Harvey
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 61 (05): : 650 - 657
  • [5] Effect of nitrous oxide use on external cephalic version success rate; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Massalha, Manal
    Izhaki, Ido
    Iskander, Rula
    Salim, Raed
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 9702 - 9708
  • [6] Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery
    Sela, Hen Y.
    Fiegenberg, Tomer
    Ben-Meir, Assaf
    Elchalal, Uriel
    Ezra, Yossef
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 142 (02) : 111 - 114
  • [7] Prediction models for successful external cephalic version: a systematic review
    Velzel, Joost
    de Hundt, Marcella
    Mulder, Frederique M.
    Molkenboer, Jan F. M.
    Van der Post, Joris A. M.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Kok, Marjolein
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 195 : 160 - 167
  • [8] Effect of Regional Anesthesia on the Success Rate of External Cephalic Version A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Goetzinger, Katherine R.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Macones, George A.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (05): : 1137 - 1144
  • [9] Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: a systematic review
    Sultan, P.
    Carvalho, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 20 (04) : 299 - 306
  • [10] Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version
    Ben-Haroush, A
    Perri, T
    Bar, J
    Yogev, Y
    Bar-Hava, I
    Hod, M
    Kaplan, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2002, 19 (07) : 355 - 360