Analysis of Maintenance 5.0 Implementation Challenges: An Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Fuzzy MICMAC

被引:0
|
作者
Aktef, Zineb [1 ]
Cherrafi, Anass [1 ]
Elfezazi, Said [1 ]
机构
[1] Cadi Ayyad Univ, EST Safi, Marrakech Safi, Marrakesh, Morocco
来源
INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL 2, INFUS 2024 | 2024年 / 1089卷
关键词
Maintenance; 5.0; Industry; ISM Method; MICMAC Analysis; SUPPLY CHAIN;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-67195-1_72
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper aims to identify and analyze the maintenance 5.0 implementation challenges in the manufacturing industry. This study applied an approach by developing a structural relationship model based on interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and fuzzy input-based cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) to analyze and prioritize the challenges impacting the implementation of maintenance 5.0 approaches. Results confirmed that the barriers, complexity of technology (CT), and cybersecurity risks (CSR) are situated at the lowest level of the hierarchy, alluding to an important driver power. The barriers of insufficient and poor-quality data (IPD), lack of adequate training (LAT), and lack of qualified workforce (LQW) are identified in the category of the linkage challenges with strong driving and dependence powers. It is also observed that the high implementation costs (HIC) is a feeble driver but heavily dependent on the other challenges. The findings of this study simplify the process for decision-makers to address and mitigate these barriers. Further, the limitations of this study have been listed, offering opportunities for further investigation in this research area. Finally, future research directions and theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 657
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Understanding influential factors on implementing social sustainability practices in Manufacturing Firms: An interpretive structural modelling (ISM) analysis
    Awan, Usama
    Kraslawski, Andrzej
    Huiskonen, Janne
    28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING (FAIM2018): GLOBAL INTEGRATION OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING AND SMART INDUSTRY FOR GOOD OF HUMANITY, 2018, 17 : 1039 - 1048
  • [32] Development of delay mitigation measures in construction projects: a combined interpretative structural modeling and MICMAC analysis approach
    Arantes, Amilcar
    Ferreira, Luis Miguel D. F.
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2024, 35 (10) : 1164 - 1179
  • [33] Analysis of challenges for blockchain adoption within the Indian public sector: an interpretive structural modelling approach
    Rana, Nripendra P.
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
    Hughes, D. Laurie
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2022, 35 (02) : 548 - 576
  • [34] Readiness assessment of leagility supply chain based on fuzzy cognitive maps and interpretive structural modeling: a case study
    Kalantari, Taher
    Khoshalhan, Farid
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2018, 33 (04) : 442 - 456
  • [35] Analysis of barriers to implement solar power installations in India using interpretive structural modeling technique
    Ansari, Md. Fahim
    Kharb, Ravinder Kumar
    Luthra, Sunil
    Shimmi, S. L.
    Chatterji, S.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 27 : 163 - 174
  • [36] Interpretive structural modeling and path analysis for proposed framework of lean supply chain in Indian manufacturing industry
    Sonia, Gunjan
    Kodali, Rambabu
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2016, 33 (08) : 501 - 515
  • [37] Barriers to e-banking adoption in Egypt: an expert-based interpretive structural modeling analysis
    Hassan, Rasha
    DIGITAL POLICY REGULATION AND GOVERNANCE, 2025,
  • [38] Analysis of challenges for automobile service garages in India: a structural modeling approach
    James, Ajith Tom
    Kumar, Girish
    Bhalla, Megha
    Amar, Megha
    Jain, Prasham
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2021, 18 (03) : 392 - 413
  • [39] Challenges to the Implementation of BIM for the Risk Management of Oil and Gas Construction Projects: Structural Equation Modeling Approach
    Waqar, Ahsan
    Othman, Idris
    Gonzalez-Lezcano, Roberto Alonso
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [40] Dynamic modeling of human error in industrial maintenance through structural analysis and system dynamics
    Bafandegan Emroozi, Vahideh
    Kazemi, Mostafa
    Pooya, Alireza
    Doostparast, Mahdi
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2024,