Analysis of Maintenance 5.0 Implementation Challenges: An Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Fuzzy MICMAC

被引:0
|
作者
Aktef, Zineb [1 ]
Cherrafi, Anass [1 ]
Elfezazi, Said [1 ]
机构
[1] Cadi Ayyad Univ, EST Safi, Marrakech Safi, Marrakesh, Morocco
来源
INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL 2, INFUS 2024 | 2024年 / 1089卷
关键词
Maintenance; 5.0; Industry; ISM Method; MICMAC Analysis; SUPPLY CHAIN;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-67195-1_72
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper aims to identify and analyze the maintenance 5.0 implementation challenges in the manufacturing industry. This study applied an approach by developing a structural relationship model based on interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and fuzzy input-based cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) to analyze and prioritize the challenges impacting the implementation of maintenance 5.0 approaches. Results confirmed that the barriers, complexity of technology (CT), and cybersecurity risks (CSR) are situated at the lowest level of the hierarchy, alluding to an important driver power. The barriers of insufficient and poor-quality data (IPD), lack of adequate training (LAT), and lack of qualified workforce (LQW) are identified in the category of the linkage challenges with strong driving and dependence powers. It is also observed that the high implementation costs (HIC) is a feeble driver but heavily dependent on the other challenges. The findings of this study simplify the process for decision-makers to address and mitigate these barriers. Further, the limitations of this study have been listed, offering opportunities for further investigation in this research area. Finally, future research directions and theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 657
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for unfolding the digital servitization implementation
    Favoretto, Camila
    Mendes, Glauco Henrique de Sousa
    Mota, Renata de Oliveira
    Godinho Filho, Moacir
    Osiro, Lauro
    Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devos
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2024, 39 (09) : 2038 - 2054
  • [2] Evaluating Industry 4.0 Implementation Challenges Using Interpretive Structural Modeling and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Bakhtari, Ahmad Reshad
    Waris, Mohammad Maqbool
    Sanin, Cesar
    Szczerbicki, Edward
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2021, 52 (05) : 350 - 378
  • [3] Modeling Deming's quality principles to improve performance using interpretive structural modeling and MICMAC analysis
    Agrawal, Nishant Mukesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 36 (07) : 1159 - 1180
  • [4] Development of framework for just-in-time implementation in maintenance: An ISM-MICMAC approach
    Phogat, Sandeep
    Gupta, Anil Kumar
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY IN MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, 2018, 24 (04) : 488 - 510
  • [5] Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis for Identifying and Benchmarking Significant Factors of Seismic Soil Liquefaction
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Tang, Xiao-Wei
    Qiu, Jiang-Nan
    Ahmad, Feezan
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [6] Priority Challenges of University Technology Transfer with Interpretative Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis
    Quinones, Renissa S.
    Caladcad, June Anne A.
    Quinones, Hubert G.
    Castro, Charena J.
    Caballes, Shirley Ann A.
    Abellana, Dharyll Prince M.
    Jabilles, Eula Margareth Y.
    Himang, Celbert M.
    Ocampo, Lanndon A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 17 (05)
  • [7] Modeling of strategic thinking enablers: a modified total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) and MICMAC approach
    Dhir, Sanjay
    Dhir, Swati
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 11 (01) : 175 - 188
  • [8] Analysis of barriers for sustainable agro-food supply chain: an interpretive structural modeling and MICMAC approach
    Singh, Kuldeep
    Abraham, Rebecca
    Yadav, Jitendra
    Agrawal, Amit Kumar
    Kolar, Prasanna
    Misra, Madhvendra
    Yadav, Avikshit
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (10) : 25311 - 25333
  • [9] A Study of Supply Chain Risk in the Brazilian Wind Power Projects by Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis
    Troche-Escobar, Jorge Arnaldo
    Lepikson, Herman Augusto
    Mendonca Freires, Francisco Gaudencio
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [10] Analysis of factors inhibiting the customer engagement of eHealth in India: Modeling the barriers using ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC analysis
    Das, Dikhita
    Sengar, Anita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 178