Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) in the UK

被引:0
作者
Bean, Karen [1 ]
Jones, Simon A. [2 ]
Chakrapani, Anupam [3 ]
Vijay, Suresh [4 ]
Wu, Teresa [2 ]
Church, Heather [2 ]
Chanson, Charlotte [1 ]
Olaye, Andrew [1 ]
Miller, Beckley [5 ]
Jensen, Ivar [5 ]
Pang, Francis [1 ]
机构
[1] Orchard Therapeut, London W6 8PW, England
[2] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Div Cell Matrix Biol & Regenerat Med, Sch Biol Sci, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester M13 9WL, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp Sick Children, London WC1N 3JH, England
[4] Birmingham Womens & Children NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham B4 6NH, England
[5] Precis AQ, Boston, MA 02108 USA
关键词
cost-effectiveness; cost utility analysis; metachromatic leukodystrophy; MLD; newborn screening; NHS; decision-tree model; SOCIETAL COSTS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3390/ijns10030045
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a fatal inherited lysosomal storage disease that can be detected through newborn bloodspot screening. The feasibility of the screening assay and the clinical rationale for screening for MLD have been previously demonstrated, so the aim of this study is to determine whether the addition of screening for MLD to the routine newborn screening program in the UK is a cost-effective use of National Health Service (NHS) resources. A health economic analysis from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services was developed based on a decision-tree framework for each MLD subtype using long-term outcomes derived from a previously presented partitioned survival and Markov economic model. Modelling inputs for parameters related to epidemiology, test characteristics, screening and treatment costs were based on data from three major UK specialist MLD hospitals, structured expert opinion and published literature. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 1.5% to account for time preference. Uncertainty associated with the parameter inputs was explored using sensitivity analyses. This health economic analysis demonstrates that newborn screening for MLD is a cost-effective use of NHS resources using a willingness-to-pay threshold appropriate to the severity of the disease; and supports the inclusion of MLD into the routine newborn screening programme in the UK.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry for glutaric aciduria type 1: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Pfeil, Johannes
    Listl, Stefan
    Hoffmann, Georg F.
    Koelker, Stefan
    Lindner, Martin
    Burgard, Peter
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2013, 8
  • [42] Newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry for glutaric aciduria type 1: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Johannes Pfeil
    Stefan Listl
    Georg F Hoffmann
    Stefan Kölker
    Martin Lindner
    Peter Burgard
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 8
  • [43] The cost-effectiveness of screening for ovarian cancer: results from the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
    Usha Menon
    Alistair J McGuire
    Maria Raikou
    Andy Ryan
    Susan K Davies
    Matthew Burnell
    Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
    Jatinderpal K Kalsi
    Naveena Singh
    Nazar N Amso
    Derek Cruickshank
    Stephen Dobbs
    Keith Godfrey
    Jonathan Herod
    Simon Leeson
    Tim Mould
    John Murdoch
    David Oram
    Ian Scott
    Mourad W Seif
    Karin Williamson
    Robert Woolas
    Lesley Fallowfield
    Stuart Campbell
    Steven J Skates
    Mahesh Parmar
    Ian J Jacobs
    British Journal of Cancer, 2017, 117 : 619 - 627
  • [44] The cost-effectiveness of screening for ovarian cancer: results from the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
    Menon, Usha
    McGuire, Alistair J.
    Raikou, Maria
    Ryan, Andy
    Davies, Susan K.
    Burnell, Matthew
    Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
    Kalsi, Jatinderpal K.
    Singh, Naveena
    Amso, Nazar N.
    Cruickshank, Derek
    Dobbs, Stephen
    Godfrey, Keith
    Herod, Jonathan
    Leeson, Simon
    Mould, Tim
    Murdoch, John
    Oram, David
    Scott, Ian
    Seif, Mourad W.
    Williamson, Karin
    Woolas, Robert
    Fallowfield, Lesley
    Campbell, Stuart
    Skates, Steven J.
    Parmar, Mahesh
    Jacobs, Ian J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 117 (05) : 619 - 627
  • [45] The Cost-Effectiveness of Ranibizumab Treat and Extend Regimen Versus Aflibercept in the UK
    Ghosh, Wrik
    Wickstead, Rose
    Claxton, Lindsay
    Kusel, Jeanette
    Taylor, Matthew
    Fleetwood, Kelly
    Pulikottil-Jacob, Ruth
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2016, 33 (09) : 1660 - 1676
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness of population screening for aortic stenosis
    Motazedian, Pouya
    Prosperi-Porta, Graeme
    Hibbert, Benjamin
    Jalal, Hawre
    Labinaz, Marino
    Burwash, Ian G.
    Abdel-Razek, Omar
    Di Santo, Pietro
    Simard, Trevor
    Wells, George
    Coyle, Doug
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2024,
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Slovakia
    Babela, Robert
    Orsagh, Andrej
    Ricova, Jana
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Csanadi, Marcell
    De Koning, Harry
    Reckova, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2022, 31 (05) : 415 - 421
  • [48] Cost-Effectiveness of Tomosynthesis in Annual Screening Mammography
    Kalra, Vivek B.
    Wu, Xiao
    Haas, Brian M.
    Forman, Howard P.
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 207 (05) : 1152 - 1155
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness of hysteroscopy screening for infertile women
    Kasius, Jenneke C.
    Eijkemans, Rene J. C.
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Fauser, Bart C. J. M.
    Fatemi, Human M.
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2013, 26 (06) : 619 - 626
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in Japan
    Okamoto, N
    CANCER, 2000, 89 (11) : 2489 - 2493