Determining the Optimal Environmental Information for Training Computational Models of Lexical Semantics and Lexical Organization

被引:0
|
作者
Johns, Brendan T. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Psychol, 2001 McGill Coll Ave, Montreal, PQ H3A 1G1, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE | 2024年 / 78卷 / 03期
关键词
lexical semantics; lexical organization; computational modeling; machine learning; big data; s & eacute; mantique lexicale; organisation lexicale; mod & eacute; lisation computationnelle; apprentissage automatique; m & eacute; gadonn & eacute; es; WORD-FREQUENCY; CONTEXTUAL DIVERSITY; LANGUAGE; ASSOCIATION; MEMORY; NEED;
D O I
10.1037/cep0000344
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Experiential theories of cognition propose that the external environment shapes cognitive processing, shifting emphasis from internal mechanisms to the learning of environmental structure. Computational modelling, particularly distributional models of lexical semantics (e.g., Landauer & Dumais, 1997) and models of lexical organization (e.g., Johns, 2021a), exemplifies this, highlights the influence of language experience on cognitive representations. While these models have been successful, comparatively less attention has been paid to the training materials used to train these models. Recent research has explored the role of social/communicatively oriented training materials on models of lexical semantics and organization (Johns, 2021a, 2021b, 2023, 2024), introducing discourse- and user-centred text training materials. However, determining the optimal training materials for these two model types remains an open question. This article addresses this problem by using experiential optimization (Johns, Jones, & Mewhort, 2019), which selects the materials that maximize model performance. This study will use experiential optimization to compare user-based and discourse-based corpora in optimizing models of lexical organization and semantics, offering insight into pathways towards integrating cognitive models in these areas. Experiential theories of cognition assert that cognitive processing is shaped by the external environment, primarily through the learning of environmental structure. Computational models demonstrate this influence, emphasizing the impact of language experience on the forming of cognitive representations. Recent research in this area has explored the effect of social/communicative training materials on these models, yet the optimal training material type for each system remains uncertain. This study utilizes a machine learning framework to compare the impact of different corpora on computational models of lexical organization and lexical semantics, providing important clues about how to integrate these model types into a larger framework.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 173
页数:11
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Challenges in the Computational Implementation of Montagovian Lexical Semantics
    Mery, Bruno
    NEW FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 10247 : 90 - 107
  • [2] Determining the Importance of Frequency and Contextual Diversity in the Lexical Organization of Multiword Expressions
    Senaldi, Marco S. G.
    Titone, Debra A.
    Johns, Brendan T.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2022, 76 (02): : 87 - 98
  • [3] A Computational Approach to Zulu Verb Morphology within the Context of Lexical Semantics
    Bosch, Sonja E.
    Pretorius, Laurette
    LEXIKOS, 2017, 27 : 152 - 182
  • [4] Unraveling lexical semantics in the brain: Comparing internal, external, and hybrid language models
    Yang, Yang
    Li, Luan
    de Deyne, Simon
    Li, Bing
    Wang, Jing
    Cai, Qing
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2024, 45 (01)
  • [5] Using lexical information automatically extracted from corpora in the computational parsing of Portuguese
    de Alencar, Leonel Figueiredo
    REVISTA DE ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM, 2011, 19 (01) : 7 - 85
  • [6] Using stochastic language models (SLM) to map lexical, syntactic, and phonological information processing in the brain
    Lopopolo, Alessandro
    Frank, Stefan L.
    van den Bosch, Antal
    Willems, Roel M.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):