Evaluation of the accuracy of digital indirect bonding vs. conventional systems: a randomized clinical trial

被引:1
作者
Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto Soares [1 ]
de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez [2 ]
Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi [1 ]
Ursi, Weber [1 ]
Chilvarquer, Israel [1 ]
Neto, Jose Rino [1 ]
de Paiva, Joao Batista [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Radiol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Digital bonding; Digital flow; Indirect bonding; CAD/CAM; Digital trays; OBJECTIVE GRADING SYSTEM; BRACKET PLACEMENT; MESIODISTAL ANGULATION; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH; AMERICAN-BOARD; STRENGTH; TRAYS; TEETH;
D O I
10.2319/030624-179.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy and chair time of self-ligating brackets using direct bonding, traditional indirect bonding (IB), and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) IB techniques after orthodontic leveling and alignment. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to three bonding groups (G1 [n = 15], G2 [n = 15], and G3 [n = 15]). Evaluation after the alignment and leveling phases used two parameters of the objective grading system of the American Board of Orthodontics for root parallelism and posterior marginal ridges, assessed using panoramic radiographies (PR I and PR II), a digital model, and a plaster model. Blinding was only applied for outcome assessment. No serious harm was observed except for gingivitis associated with plaque accumulation. Results: Although G3 showed better numerical results, they were not statistically significant in the radiographic or model evaluations (P > .001). Mean chair time was significantly shorter in G3 (1.1 +/- 11.8 min) vs. G1 (56.7 +/- 7.3 min) and G2 (52.8 +/- 8.3 min; P < .001). Conclusions: The CAD/CAM IB system for self-ligating brackets was as effective as conventional methods, with a shorter chair time.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] ASSESSMENT OF BRACKET PLACEMENT AND BOND STRENGTH WHEN COMPARING DIRECT BONDING TO INDIRECT BONDING TECHNIQUES
    AGUIRRE, MJ
    KING, GJ
    WALDRON, JM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1982, 82 (04) : 269 - 276
  • [2] Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile™ method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy
    Alford, Timothy J.
    Roberts, W. Eugene
    Hartsfield, James K., Jr.
    Eckert, George J.
    Snyder, Ronald J.
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (03) : 383 - 388
  • [3] Alrbata R, 2017, Int J Orthod Rehabil, P3
  • [4] American Board of Orthodontics, 2008, Grading System for Dental Casts and Panoramic Radiographs, P17
  • [5] Andrews L F, 1979, Br J Orthod, V6, P125
  • [6] 6 KEYS TO NORMAL OCCLUSION
    ANDREWS, LF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1972, 62 (03): : 296 - &
  • [7] Laser guided automated calibrating system for accurate bracket placement
    Anitha, A.
    Kumar, A. J.
    Mascarenhas, R.
    Husain, A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2015, 5 (01): : 42 - 44
  • [8] Reproducibility of digital indirect bonding technique using three-dimensional (3D) models and 3D-printed transfer trays
    Assad Duarte, Maria Eduarda
    Gribel, Bruno Frazao
    Spitz, Alice
    Artese, Flavia
    Mendes Miguel, Jose Augusto
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2020, 90 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [9] VARIATIONS IN BRACKET PLACEMENT IN THE PREADJUSTED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE
    BALUT, N
    KLAPPER, L
    SANDRIK, J
    BOWMAN, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 102 (01) : 62 - 67
  • [10] Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system
    Brown, Matthew W.
    Koroluk, Lorne
    Ko, Ching-Chang
    Zhang, Kai
    Chen, Mengqi
    Nguyen, Tung
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 148 (06) : 1067 - 1074