Design and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge about Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation in Chilean Higher Education Students

被引:0
作者
Mejia-Elvir, Percy [1 ]
Sandoval-Henriquez, Francisco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Santisima Concepcion, Fac Educ, Concepcion, Chile
来源
RIE-REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION EDUCATIVA | 2025年 / 43卷
关键词
Higher education; gender identity; sexual orientation; validation; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.6018/rie.599871
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Knowledge of gender identity and sexual orientation is essential to build more inclusive, equitable and respectful societies, where each person can live authentically without facing discrimination or stigmatization. The research focused on designing and validating an instrument to measure knowledge of gender identity and sexual orientation in Chilean higher education students. For this task, rigorous criteria were followed in the design and validation process: theoretical review, expert judgment, cognitive interview, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The instrument was administered to a convenience sample of 401 students belonging to a higher education institution located in the Biob & iacute;o region, Chile. The results revealed a latent structure with adequate fit to the data, composed of 15 items underlying the variables of gender identity and sexual orientation. Reliability was established at an Omega coefficient of .87 and a Cronbach's alpha of .86, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. The instrument is a tool that seeks to promote inclusion, equity and understanding, by identifying areas of ignorance or misunderstandings that could contribute to discriminatory attitudes or unintentional exclusions in the context of higher education. It also provides information for the design of future educational programs that promote inclusion, equity, and understanding.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]  
Congreso de la Republica de Chile, 2011, LEY 20536 CUAL SE PR
[12]  
ESPEJO JUAN CORNEJO, 2018, Rev. Bras. Educ., V23, pe230031, DOI [10.1590/s1413-24782018230031, 10.1590/s1413-24782018230031]
[13]  
Hawrylak MF, 2020, INT J DEV EDUC PSYCH, V1, P393, DOI [10.17060/ijodaep.2020.n1.v1.1796, 10.17060/ijodaep.2020.n1.v1.1796, DOI 10.17060/IJODAEP.2020.N1.V1.1796]
[14]   Old and new ideas for data screening and assumption testing for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis [J].
Flora, David B. ;
LaBrish, Cathy ;
Chalmers, R. Philip .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3
[15]  
Galaz C., 2021, Education Policy Analysis Archives, V29, P1, DOI [10.14507/epaa.29.5953, DOI 10.14507/EPAA.29.5953]
[16]   An ambivalent alliance - Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality [J].
Glick, P ;
Fiske, ST .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 56 (02) :109-118
[17]  
Gonzlez C., 2022, Human Rigths Watch
[18]  
Hernandez-Nieto R. A., 2002, Contributions to Statistical Analysis
[19]   A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
HORN, JL .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1965, 30 (02) :179-185
[20]  
Iniciativa Latinoamericana de Datos Abiertos, 2021, Visibilizando la violencia y discriminacion contra la poblacion LGBTIQ+