Sling and forget it? A systematic review of operative versus nonoperative outcomes for scapula fractures

Background: The majority of scapula fractures have historically been treated nonoperatively. The current literature describing patient outcomes following scapula fractures is limited. Our objective was to determine differences in outcomes between operatively and nonoperatively treated scapular fractures. The goal of our study was to provide an updated and comprehensive systematic review for scapula body, neck, and glenoid fractures focusing on several outcomes including union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and any recorded complication. Methods: The PRISMA methodology was followed for this systematic review. Articles were obtained from the PubMed/Medline database using the following search terms: scapula body OR scapula neck OR intra-articular glenoid AND fracture. Additional articles were obtained by searching the bibliographies of included references. Studies were included if they contained clinical data on one or more of our study objectives and contained participants with a scapular body, neck, and/or glenoid fracture who were at least 16 year old. A total of 35 papers, with 822 total cases were included. Studies chosen were assessed for level of evidence and reviewed for data pertaining to the current study objectives. All cases of scapula fractures found throughout the literature were analyzed for outcome data. Outcomes studied included union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and recorded complications. Results: The overwhelming majority of scapula fractures go on to union. The majority of patients will eventually return to work. Persistent postinjury pain is unfortunately common. Shoulder range of motion and strength are decreased when compared to the contralateral shoulder. Nonoperative glenoid fractures have the lowest reported functional scores. Malunion, need for additional surgeries, and posttraumatic arthritis were the most common complications. Conclusion: When treating scapula fractures, orthopedic surgeons must consider the specific fracture pattern, as well as patient specific goals. Risks and benefits of both operative and nonoperative management should be discussed with the patient including the exceptionally low nonunion rate regardless of treatment option and that persistent pain following injury is unfortunately common. Level of evidence: Level V; Systematic Review (c) 2024 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.