Advancing Sustainable Energy: Environmental and Economic Assessment of Plastic Waste Gasification for Syngas and Electricity Generation Using Life Cycle Modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Javed, Muhammad Hassan [1 ]
Ahmad, Anees [1 ]
Rehan, Mohammad [2 ]
Musharavati, Farayi [3 ]
Nizami, Abdul-Sattar [1 ,4 ]
Khan, Mohammad Ilyas [5 ]
机构
[1] Govt Coll Univ, Sustainable Dev Study Ctr, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Ctr Excellence Environm Studies CEES, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[3] Qatar Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Doha, Qatar
[4] Korea Univ, Grad Sch Energy & Environm, Seoul 02481, South Korea
[5] King Khalid Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
关键词
gasification; life cycle assessment; plastic waste; sustainability; synthetic gas; TO-ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.3390/su17031277
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The explosion of plastic waste generation, approaching 400 million tons per year, has created a worldwide environmental crisis that conventional waste management systems cannot handle. This problem can be solved through gasification, which converts nonrecyclable plastics to syngas with potential applications in electricity generation and synthetic fuel production. This study investigates whether syngas production from plastic waste by gasification is environmentally and economically feasible. Environmental impacts were assessed through a life cycle assessment framework using a life cycle impact assessment approach, ReCiPe 2016, with 10 midpoint/endpoint categories. Midpoint results of the baseline scenario with grid-mix electricity revealed climate change (GWP) of 775 kg CO2 equivalent and fossil depletion potential (FDP) of 311 kg oil equivalent per ton of plastic waste. Meanwhile, a solar scenario showed GWP as 435 kg CO2 equivalent and FDP as 166 kg oil equivalent per ton of plastic waste. Switching to solar energy cut GWP 44% and FDP 47%, respectively. However, the tradeoffs were higher human toxicity potential (HTP) and marine ecotoxicity potential (METP) due to upstream material extraction of renewable systems, respectively. Among environmental performance drivers, electricity inputs and operating materials were identified through sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Syngas production from a plant of 50 tons per day can yield electricity sales revenue of USD 4.79 million, excluding USD 4.05 million in operational expenditures. Financial indicators like a 2.06-year payback period, USD 5.32 million net present value over a 20-year project life, and 38.2% internal rate of return indicate the profitability of the system. An external cost analysis showed emissions-related costs of USD 26.43 per ton of plastic waste processed, dominated by CO2 and NOx emissions. Despite these costs, the avoided impacts of less landfilling/incineration and electricity generation support gasification. Gasification should be promoted as a subsidy and incentive by policymakers for wider adoption and integration into municipal waste management systems. Findings show it can be adapted to global sustainability goals and circular economy principles while delivering strong economic returns. The study findings also contribute to several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), for instance, SDG 7 by promoting clean energy technologies, SDG 12 by implementing circular economy, and SDG 13 by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of waste tyres: properties, life cycle assessment and energy generation
    Kaur, Perminder Jit
    Kaushik, Geetanjali
    Hussain, Chaudhery Mustansar
    Dutta, Venkatesh
    ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (02) : 261 - 271
  • [22] Environmental profile of thermoelectrics for applications with continuous waste heat generation via life cycle assessment
    Iyer, Rakesh Krishnamoorthy
    Pilla, Srikanth
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 752
  • [23] Life cycle thinking of plasma gasification as a waste-to-energy tool: Review on environmental, economic and social aspects
    Ramos, Ana
    Rouboa, Abel
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 153
  • [24] Energy Efficiency and Life Cycle Assessment with System Dynamics of Electricity Production from Rice Straw Using a Combined Gasification and Internal Combustion Engine
    Reano, Resmond L.
    de Padua, Victor Antonio N.
    Halog, Anthony B.
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (16)
  • [25] Life cycle assessment and cost benefit analysis of concentrated solar thermal gasification of biomass for continuous electricity generation
    Fang, Yi
    Li, Xian
    Ascher, Simon
    Li, Yize
    Dai, Leilei
    Ruan, Roger
    You, Siming
    ENERGY, 2023, 284
  • [26] Life-cycle environmental and economic assessment of medical waste treatment
    Hong, Jingmin
    Zhan, Song
    Yu, Zhaohe
    Hong, Jinglan
    Qi, Congcong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 : 65 - 73
  • [27] Assessing the Environmental Impact of Municipal Waste on Energy Incineration Technology for Power Generation Using Life Cycle Assessment Methodology
    Luo, Yiting
    Ye, Mingqiang
    Zhou, Yihui
    Su, Rongkui
    Huang, Shunhong
    Wang, Hangqing
    Dai, Xiangrong
    TOXICS, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of environmental impact on municipal solid waste incineration power generation
    Liu, Donghui
    Wang, Shanshan
    Xue, Ruoyu
    Gao, Gengyu
    Zhang, Ruiqin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (46) : 65435 - 65446
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of second generation ethanol derived from banana agricultural waste: Environmental impacts and energy balance
    Belen Guerrero, Ana
    Munoz, Edmundo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 : 710 - 717
  • [30] Environmental Performance of Electricity Generation Based on Resources: A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study in Turkey
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Ozdemir, Alp
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Banar, Mufide
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (11)