In Vivo Performance of a Novel Hyper-Crosslinked Carbohydrate Polymer Bone Graft Substitute for Spinal Fusion

被引:0
作者
Kim, Kee D. [1 ]
Batchelder, Cynthia A. [2 ]
Koleva, Plamena [2 ]
Ghaffari-Rafi, Arash [1 ]
Karnati, Tejas [1 ]
Goodrich, Dylan [1 ]
Castillo, Jose [1 ]
Lee, Charles [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Sacramento, CA 95816 USA
[2] Mol Matrix Inc, 11121 Sun Ctr Drive Suite C, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Cell Biol & Human Anat, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
BIOENGINEERING-BASEL | 2025年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
bone graft substitute; spinal fusion; arthrodesis; bone fractures;
D O I
10.3390/bioengineering12030243
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Bone graft materials are essential for achieving arthrodesis after spine surgery. Safe bone graft products, with osteoinductive, osteoconductive properties and the ability to monitor fusion in real-time, are highly desirable. A novel hyper-crosslinked carbohydrate polymer (HCCP) bone graft substitute was shown to aid in bone regeneration in critical-size defect studies in a rabbit model. These studies further evaluated the in vivo application of HCCP as a bone graft substitute in an ovine model of spinal fusion and a retrospective study in adult human spine surgery patients. Sheep studies demonstrated the safety and efficacy of HCCP with no evidence of adverse histopathology over 6 months of follow-up. In human studies, patients (N = 63) underwent posterolateral fusion with HCCP, with follow-up to assess fusion success. No adverse reaction related to the HCCP bone graft substitute was identified. Fusion success was noted to be non-inferior to other bone graft substitutes. HCCP appears to be a safe bone void filler adjunct for use in spinal fusion surgery for both trauma and degenerative disease. It has a good degradation profile for forming bone with the ability to provide new vasculature and may also function as a scaffold to carry cells, medications, and growth factors. Given the safety profile experienced in our preclinical and clinical studies, future investigation into its efficacy to achieve solid fusion is currently ongoing.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [41] Strocchi Rita, 2002, J Oral Implantol, V28, P273, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0273:BRWCSE>2.3.CO
  • [42] 2
  • [43] Teriparatide and bisphosphonate use in osteoporotic spinal fusion patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tsai, Sung Huang Laurent
    Chien, Ruei-Shyuan
    Lichter, Katie
    Alharthy, Raghad
    Alvi, Mohammed Ali
    Goyal, Anshit
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Fu, Tsai-Sheng
    Lin, Tung-Yi
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [44] Autograft versus Allograft for Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Tuchman, Alexander
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    Youssef, Jim A.
    Meisel, Hans-Joerg
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    Park, Jong-Beom
    Yoon, S. Tim
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (01) : 59 - 70
  • [45] Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice
    VandeVord, PJ
    Matthew, HWT
    DeSilva, SP
    Mayton, L
    Wu, B
    Wooley, PH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2002, 59 (03): : 585 - 590
  • [46] Vos T, 2020, LANCET, V396, P1562
  • [47] Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review
    Wang, Wenhao
    Yeung, Kelvin W. K.
    [J]. BIOACTIVE MATERIALS, 2017, 2 (04) : 224 - 247
  • [48] Are sheep spines a valid biomechanical model for human spines?
    Wilke, HJ
    Kettler, A
    Claes, LE
    [J]. SPINE, 1997, 22 (20) : 2365 - 2374