Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Tubal Ligation: Insights from a Retrospective Study in a Tertiary University Hospital

被引:0
作者
Al-Husban, Naser [1 ]
Al Kiswani, Somaya [1 ]
Al-Falooji, Nadeen [1 ]
Alzibdeh, Abdulla [1 ]
Fakhouri, Zaid [1 ]
Haddad, Murad [1 ]
Al-Adwan, Mai [1 ]
Alhusban, Alhsna [1 ]
Al-Omari, Leen [1 ]
Abuhamdah, Reem [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amman 11196, Jordan
关键词
contraception; tubal ligation; sterilization; family planning; pregnancy; STERILIZATION;
D O I
10.31083/j.ceog5109194
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Female sterilization remains a prevalent contraceptive method globally, despite a declining trend in prevalence over the past decades. Methods: To compare the outcomes of tubal ligation between laparoscopic and open surgical approaches, conducted at the Jordan University Hospital from 2010 to 2021. Results: 242 females underwent tubal ligation with 131 had open surgery and 111 had laparoscopic surgery. The median follow-up period for the cohort was 8 years. For the entire study cohort, the mean age at the time of surgery was 37.77 years (standard deviation (SD) = 4.589). A statistically significant (p < 0.0001) difference in age was found, with mean age being older in the laparoscopy group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gravidity (p = 0.9499) or parity (p = 0.4867). Remarkably, only two pregnancies were documented during the follow-up period, both of which were observed in the laparoscopic surgery group. Overall free-from-pregnancy rate at 8 years was 98.79%; 97.59% in the laparoscopy group and 100% in the open surgery group. Conclusions: Both open and laparoscopic tubal sterilization are equally effective permanent contraceptives. While our study contributes to the understanding of tubal ligation outcomes, further research, particularly in developing countries like Jordan, is warranted to address the unique needs and challenges of diverse populations in reproductive healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Factors affecting the use of long term and permanent contraceptive methods: a Facebook-focused cross-sectional study [J].
Al-Husban, Naser ;
Kaadan, Dalia ;
Foudeh, Jude ;
Ghazi, Tara ;
Sijari, Yumen ;
Maaita, Maher .
BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
[2]   Do modern family planning methods impact women's quality of life? Jordanian women's perspective [J].
Alyahya, Mohammad S. ;
Hijazi, Heba H. ;
Alshraideh, Hussam A. ;
Al-sheyab, Nihaya A. ;
Alomari, Dana ;
Malkawi, Sara ;
Qassas, Sarah ;
Darabseh, Samah ;
Khader, Yousef S. .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (01)
[3]  
BHIWANDIWALA PP, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P391
[4]  
Contraceptive Use by Method, 2019, Population Division
[5]   A social-ecological examination into the research, policy and health service delivery environment related to early marriage and sexual and gender-based violence among youth in Jordan [J].
Gausman, Jewel ;
Othman, Areej ;
Dababneh, Abeer ;
Dabobe, Maysoon ;
Hamad, Iqbal ;
Daas, Insaf ;
Langer, Ana .
BMC INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 2020, 20 (01)
[6]   Female sterilization: Update on clinical efficacy, side effects and contraindications [J].
Gizzo, Salvatore ;
Bertocco, Anna ;
Saccardi, Carlo ;
Di Gangi, Stefania ;
Litta, Pietro Salvatore ;
D'Antona, Donato ;
Nardelli, Giovanni Battista .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 23 (05) :261-270
[7]   The future of male contraception: a fertile ground [J].
Khourdaji, Iyad ;
Zillioux, Jacqueline ;
Eisenfrats, Kevin ;
Foley, Daniel ;
Smith, Ryan .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 :S220-S235
[8]   SALpingectomy for STERilisation (SALSTER): study protocol for a Swedish multicentre register-based randomised controlled trial [J].
Magarakis, Leonidas ;
Idahl, Annika ;
Sundfeldt, Karin ;
Liv, Per ;
Palsson, Mathias ;
Strandell, Annika .
BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (09)
[9]  
Muehlenbachs A, 2020, Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), V8, P3
[10]   Laparoscopic tubal sterilization - Methods, effectiveness, and sequelae [J].
Ryder, RM ;
Vaughan, MC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 26 (01) :83-+