Experimental feasibility study of using eco- and user-friendly mechanochemically activated slag/fly ash geopolymer for soil stabilization

被引:17
作者
Abed, Mukhtar Hamid [1 ,6 ]
Abed, Firas Hamid [1 ,2 ]
Zareei, Seyed Alireza [2 ]
Abbas, Israa Sabbar [3 ,4 ]
Canakci, Hanifi [5 ]
Kurdi, Nahidh H. [6 ]
Emami, Alireza [2 ]
机构
[1] Al Ramadi Municipal, Projects Dept, Al Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Khorasgan Isfahan Branch, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Al Qalam Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kirkuk, Iraq
[4] Kirkuk Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kirkuk, Iraq
[5] Hasan Kalyoncu Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Gaziantep, Turkiye
[6] Univ Anbar, Dept Civil Engn, Anbar, Iraq
来源
CLEANER MATERIALS | 2024年 / 11卷
关键词
Geopolymer; Mechanochemical activation; Soil stabilization; Durability properties; Sulfate attack; MARGINAL LATERITIC SOIL; FLY-ASH; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; SULFATE ATTACK; STRENGTH DEVELOPMENT; GLASS POWDER; CEMENT; DURABILITY; CONCRETE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.clema.2024.100226
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study focuses on the development of eco and user-friendly mechanochemically-activated geopolymeric stabilizers, surpassing the limitations inherent in traditional geopolymerization methods. A comparative analysis was undertaken with conventionally activated geopolymer stabilizers to establish benchmarks for effectiveness in soil stabilization applications. Additionally, the research delves into the impact of granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) content on the mechanical and durability properties of stabilized soil samples. In addition, the investigation focuses on the influence of the activation method on soil effectiveness and strength post-exposure to sulfate attack. The durability performance is rigorously assessed through the immersion of specimens in a 1 % magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) solution for 60 and 120 days. The comprehensive evaluation includes visual appearance, mass changes, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV), Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS), and Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of geopolymer-stabilized soil specimens. The results showed that before the exposure to the MgSO4 solution, the UCS of mechanochemically activated geopolymer (MAG) samples was higher (12-45 %) than that of conventionally activated geopolymer (CAG)-stabilized soil. Furthermore, the strength of the geopolymer-stabilized soil improved by 114 %, 247 %, and 361 %, at 50, 75, and 100 % GGBS content, respectively. On the other hand, after exposure to the MgSO4 solution, the results showed that the mechanochemically activated geopolymer-stabilized soil has better resistance to sulfate erosion than the conventionally activated geopolymer-stabilized soil. The residual UCS for MAG and CAG samples were 93 % and 89 % when exposed to 1 % magnesium sulfate solution for 60 days, whereas they declined to 70 % and 58 %, respectively, after 120 days of immersion.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 87 条
[71]   The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline activators [J].
Ryu, Gum Sung ;
Lee, Young Bok ;
Koh, Kyung Taek ;
Chung, Young Soo .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2013, 47 :409-418
[72]   Durability performance of Palm Oil Fuel Ash-based Engineered Alkaline-activated Cementitious Composite (POFA-EACC) mortar in sulfate environment [J].
Salami, Babatunde Abiodun ;
Johari, Megat Azmi Megat ;
Ahmad, Zainal Arifin ;
Maslehuddin, Mohammad .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2017, 131 :229-244
[73]   A new low carbon cementitious binder for stabilising weak ground conditions through deep soil mixing [J].
Sargent, P. ;
Hughes, P. N. ;
Rouainia, M. .
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2016, 56 (06) :1021-1034
[74]   Laboratory studies on property changes in surrounding clays due to installation of deep mixing columns [J].
Shen, SL ;
Huang, XC ;
Du, SJ ;
Han, J .
MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 21 (01) :15-35
[75]   Pozzolanic activity of mechanochemically and thermally activated kaolins in cement [J].
Souri, Alireza ;
Kazemi-Kamyab, Hadi ;
Snellings, Ruben ;
Naghizadeh, Rahim ;
Golestani-Fard, Farhad ;
Scrivener, Karen .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2015, 77 :47-59
[76]   Comparison between cement and fly ash geopolymer for stabilized marginal lateritic soil as road material [J].
Teerawattanasuk, Chairat ;
Voottipruex, Panich .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2019, 20 (11) :1264-1274
[77]  
Thokchom S., 2010, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, V3, P36, DOI [10.25103/jestr.031.07, DOI 10.25103/JESTR.031.07]
[78]   Does gypsum formation during sulfate attack on concrete lead to expansion? [J].
Tian, B ;
Cohen, MD .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2000, 30 (01) :117-123
[79]   Impact of sulfate attack on mechanical properties and hydraulic conductivity of a cement-admixed clay [J].
Verastegui-Flores, R. D. ;
Di Emidio, G. .
APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE, 2014, 101 :490-496
[80]   Impact of field conditions on the strength development of a geopolymer stabilized marine clay [J].
Yaghoubi, Mohammadjavad ;
Arulrajah, Arul ;
Disfani, Mahdi Miri ;
Horpibulsuk, Suksun ;
Darmawan, Stephen ;
Wang, James .
APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE, 2019, 167 :33-42