Familiarity, confidence and preference of artificial intelligence feedback and prompts by Australian breast cancer screening readers

被引:0
|
作者
Trieu, Phuong Dung [1 ]
Barron, Melissa L. [1 ]
Jiang, Zhengqiang [1 ]
Taba, Seyedamir Tavakoli [1 ]
Gandomkar, Ziba [1 ]
Lewis, Sarah J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Discipline Med Imaging Sci, D18 Level 7,Susan Wakil Hlth Bldg, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Univ Dr,Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
关键词
artificial intelligence; breast cancer; clinical application; early detection; mammography; radiology; screening; survey; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1071/AH23275
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives This study explored the familiarity, perceptions and confidence of Australian radiology clinicians involved in reading screening mammograms, regarding artificial intelligence (AI) applications in breast cancer detection. Methods Sixty-five radiologists, breast physicians and radiology trainees participated in an online survey that consisted of 23 multiple choice questions asking about their experience and familiarity with AI products. Furthermore, the survey asked about their confidence in using AI outputs and their preference for AI modes applied in a breast screening context. Participants' responses to questions were compared using Pearson's chi 2 test. Bonferroni-adjusted significance tests were used for pairwise comparisons. Results Fifty-five percent of respondents had experience with AI in their workplaces, with automatic density measurement powered by machine learning being the most familiar AI product (69.4%). The top AI outputs with the highest ranks of perceived confidence were 'Displaying suspicious areas on mammograms with the percentage of cancer possibility' (67.8%) and 'Automatic mammogram classification (normal, benign, cancer, uncertain)' (64.6%). Radiology and breast physicians preferred using AI as second-reader mode (75.4% saying 'somewhat happy' to 'extremely happy') over triage (47.7%), pre-screening and first-reader modes (both with 26.2%) (P < 0.001). Conclusion The majority of screen readers expressed increased confidence in utilising AI for highlighting suspicious areas on mammograms and for automatically classifying mammograms. They considered AI as an optimal second-reader mode being the most ideal use in a screening program. The findings provide valuable insights into the familiarities and expectations of radiologists and breast clinicians for the AI products that can enhance the effectiveness of the breast cancer screening programs, benefitting both healthcare professionals and patients alike.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 311
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Artificial Intelligence Improves Detection of Supplemental Screening Ultrasound-detected Breast Cancers in Mammography
    Yoen, Heera
    Chang, Jung Min
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2023, 26 (05) : 504 - 513
  • [42] Reader bias in breast cancer screening related to cancer prevalence and artificial intelligence decision support-a reader study
    Al-Bazzaz, Hanen
    Janicijevic, Marina
    Strand, Fredrik
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (08) : 5415 - 5424
  • [43] UK National Screening Committee's approach to reviewing evidence on artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening
    Taylor-Phillips, Sian
    Seedat, Farah
    Kijauskaite, Goda
    Marshall, John
    Halligan, Steve
    Hyde, Chris
    Given-Wilson, Rosalind
    Wilkinson, Louise
    Denniston, Alastair K.
    Glocker, Ben
    Garrett, Peter
    Mackie, Anne
    Steele, Robert J.
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 4 (07): : E558 - E565
  • [44] Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening Evaluation of FDA Device Regulation and Future Recommendations
    Potnis, Kunal C.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Aneja, Sanjay
    Gross, Cary P.
    Richman, Ilana B.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 182 (12) : 1306 - 1312
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness of using artificial intelligence versus polygenic risk score to guide breast cancer screening
    Mital, Shweta
    Nguyen, Hai, V
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [46] The Transformative Power of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis
    Freitas, Vivianne
    Ghai, Sandeep
    Au, Frederick
    Muradali, Derek
    Kulkarni, Supriya
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2025, 76 (02): : 302 - 312
  • [47] Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of breast cancer Yesterday, today and tomorrow
    Bennani-Baiti, B.
    Baltzer, P. A. T.
    RADIOLOGE, 2020, 60 (01): : 56 - 63
  • [48] Using deep learning to assist readers during the arbitration process: a lesion-based retrospective evaluation of breast cancer screening performance
    Kerschke, Laura
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, Alejandro
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    Heindel, Walter
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 842 - 852
  • [49] Using deep learning to assist readers during the arbitration process: a lesion-based retrospective evaluation of breast cancer screening performance
    Laura Kerschke
    Stefanie Weigel
    Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz
    Nico Karssemeijer
    Walter Heindel
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 842 - 852
  • [50] Patients' Perceptions and Attitudes to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Narrative Review
    Pesapane, Filippo
    Giambersio, Emilia
    Capetti, Benedetta
    Monzani, Dario
    Grasso, Roberto
    Nicosia, Luca
    Rotili, Anna
    Sorce, Adriana
    Meneghetti, Lorenza
    Carriero, Serena
    Santicchia, Sonia
    Carrafiello, Gianpaolo
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    Cassano, Enrico
    LIFE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (04):