Familiarity, confidence and preference of artificial intelligence feedback and prompts by Australian breast cancer screening readers

被引:0
|
作者
Trieu, Phuong Dung [1 ]
Barron, Melissa L. [1 ]
Jiang, Zhengqiang [1 ]
Taba, Seyedamir Tavakoli [1 ]
Gandomkar, Ziba [1 ]
Lewis, Sarah J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Discipline Med Imaging Sci, D18 Level 7,Susan Wakil Hlth Bldg, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Univ Dr,Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
关键词
artificial intelligence; breast cancer; clinical application; early detection; mammography; radiology; screening; survey; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1071/AH23275
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives This study explored the familiarity, perceptions and confidence of Australian radiology clinicians involved in reading screening mammograms, regarding artificial intelligence (AI) applications in breast cancer detection. Methods Sixty-five radiologists, breast physicians and radiology trainees participated in an online survey that consisted of 23 multiple choice questions asking about their experience and familiarity with AI products. Furthermore, the survey asked about their confidence in using AI outputs and their preference for AI modes applied in a breast screening context. Participants' responses to questions were compared using Pearson's chi 2 test. Bonferroni-adjusted significance tests were used for pairwise comparisons. Results Fifty-five percent of respondents had experience with AI in their workplaces, with automatic density measurement powered by machine learning being the most familiar AI product (69.4%). The top AI outputs with the highest ranks of perceived confidence were 'Displaying suspicious areas on mammograms with the percentage of cancer possibility' (67.8%) and 'Automatic mammogram classification (normal, benign, cancer, uncertain)' (64.6%). Radiology and breast physicians preferred using AI as second-reader mode (75.4% saying 'somewhat happy' to 'extremely happy') over triage (47.7%), pre-screening and first-reader modes (both with 26.2%) (P < 0.001). Conclusion The majority of screen readers expressed increased confidence in utilising AI for highlighting suspicious areas on mammograms and for automatically classifying mammograms. They considered AI as an optimal second-reader mode being the most ideal use in a screening program. The findings provide valuable insights into the familiarities and expectations of radiologists and breast clinicians for the AI products that can enhance the effectiveness of the breast cancer screening programs, benefitting both healthcare professionals and patients alike.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 311
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
    Dileep, Gayathri
    Gyani, Sanjeev G. Gianchandani
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [2] Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
    Lan-Anh Dang
    Emmanuel Chazard
    Edouard Poncelet
    Teodora Serb
    Aniela Rusu
    Xavier Pauwels
    Clémence Parsy
    Thibault Poclet
    Hugo Cauliez
    Constance Engelaere
    Guillaume Ramette
    Charlotte Brienne
    Sofiane Dujardin
    Nicolas Laurent
    Breast Cancer, 2022, 29 : 967 - 977
  • [3] Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography
    Lan-Anh Dang
    Chazard, Emmanuel
    Poncelet, Edouard
    Serb, Teodora
    Rusu, Aniela
    Pauwels, Xavier
    Parsy, Clemence
    Poclet, Thibault
    Cauliez, Hugo
    Engelaere, Constance
    Ramette, Guillaume
    Brienne, Charlotte
    Dujardin, Sofiane
    Laurent, Nicolas
    BREAST CANCER, 2022, 29 (06) : 967 - 977
  • [4] Diagnostic capabilities of artificial intelligence as an additional reader in a breast cancer screening program
    Seker, Mustafa Ege
    Koyluoglu, Yilmaz Onat
    Ozaydin, Ayse Nilufer
    Gurdal, Sibel Ozkan
    Ozcinar, Beyza
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    Ozmen, Vahit
    Aribal, Erkin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (09) : 6145 - 6157
  • [5] Stand-alone artificial intelligence - The future of breast cancer screening?
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    Mann, Ritse M.
    BREAST, 2020, 49 : 254 - 260
  • [6] Artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening: Opportunity or hype?
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Tao, Dacheng
    BREAST, 2017, 36 : 31 - 33
  • [7] Australian women's judgements about using artificial intelligence to read mammograms in breast cancer screening
    Carter, Stacy M.
    Carolan, Lucy
    Aquino, Yves Saint James
    Frazer, Helen
    Rogers, Wendy A.
    Hall, Julie
    Degeling, Chris
    Braunack-Mayer, Annette
    Houssami, Nehmat
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [8] Are artificial intelligence systems useful in breast cancer screening programs?
    Diaz, O.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, A.
    Gubern-Merida, A.
    Marti, R.
    Chevalier, M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2021, 63 (03): : 236 - 244
  • [9] The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer
    Nafissi, Nahid
    Heiranizadeh, Naeimeh
    Shirinzadeh-Dastgiri, Ahmad
    Vakili-Ojarood, Mohammad
    Naseri, Amirhosein
    Danaei, Mahsa
    Saberi, Ali
    Aghasipour, Maryam
    Shiri, Amirmasoud
    Yeganegi, Maryam
    Rahmani, Amirhossein
    Neamatzadeh, Hossein
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 8 (03): : 235 - 244
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence as an Assistant in Breast Cancer Screening
    Fuchsjager, Michael H.
    Adelsmayr, Gabriel
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 302 (03) : 543 - 544