Trial of labor outcomes after knotless-barbed vs. conventional suture for closure of cesarean uterine incision

被引：0
|
作者：
Persky, Michal Novoselsky [1 ]
Peled, Tzuria [2 ]
Weiss, Ari [2 ]
Sela, Hen Y. [3 ]
Grisaru, Sorina Granovsky [2 ]
Ashwal, Eran [4 ]
Rottenstreich, Misgav [5 ]
机构：
[1] Hadassah Med Ctr, Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Hadassah Med Sch, Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel
[4] McMaster Univ, N York, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源：
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2024年 / 230卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
832
引用
收藏
页码：S441 / S442
页数：2
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture vs conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery
    Abraham, Cynthia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 219 (02) : 220 - 221
  • [2] A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture vs conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery
    Peleg, David
    Ahmad, Ronan Said
    Warsof, Steven L.
    Marcus-Braun, Naama
    Sciaky-Tamir, Yael
    Ben Shachar, Inbar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (03) : 343.e1 - 343.e7
  • [3] A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture vs conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery REPLY
    Peleg, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 219 (02) : 221 - 221
  • [4] Knotless barbed suture closure of the uterine incision at cesarean - a randomized controlled trial
    Peleg, David
    Ahmad, Ronan Said
    Warsof, Steven L.
    Marcus-Braun, Naama
    Sciaky-Tamir, Yael
    Ben Shachar, Inbar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S25 - S25
  • [5] Knotless Barbed versus Conventional Suture for Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Raischer, Hedi Benyamini
    Massalha, Manal
    Iskander, Rula
    Izhaki, Ido
    Salim, Raed
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (07) : 832 - 839
  • [6] Barbed versus conventional suture for uterine closure during cesarean section: An integrated retrospective study
    Sandoval-Herrera, Carlos
    Litvinova, Katerina
    Ljubic, Zorica
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S665 - S665
  • [7] Barbed vs conventional sutures for cesarean uterine scar defects: a randomized clinical trial
    Maki, Jota
    Mitoma, Tomohiro
    Ooba, Hikaru
    Nakato, Hikari
    Mishima, Sakurako
    Tani, Kazumasa
    Eto, Eriko
    Yamamoto, Dan
    Yamamoto, Risa
    Kai, Kenji
    Tamada, Takashi
    Akamatsu, Kazuyo
    Kawanishi, Kunihiro
    Masuyama, Hisashi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (09)
  • [8] Barbed sutures versus conventional sutures for uterine closure at cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial
    Zayed, Mohamed A.
    Fouda, Usama M.
    Elsetohy, Khaled A.
    Zayed, Shereef M.
    Hashem, Ahmed T.
    Youssef, Mohamed A.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (05): : 710 - 717
  • [9] Closure of primary cesarean delivery:suture vs. staples, steroids vs. none?: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Doyle, Nora
    Greig, Christina
    Mullin, Tiffany
    Ross, Patti Jayne
    Katz, Alan
    Mastrobattista, Joan M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S37 - S37
  • [10] Patient satisfaction with subcuticular suture vs. staple closure at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
    Rochon, Meredith
    Basha, Suzanne
    Quinones, Joanne
    Coassolo, Kara
    Rust, Orion
    Smulian, John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S72 - S73
123