Investigation of Variables Explaining Mathematics Literacy in PISA 2018 Turkey and China Samples Through C4.5 Decision Tree Algorithm

被引:0
作者
Ozcan, Zeynep Begumhan [1 ]
Cetin, Sevda [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Educ Sci, Div Educ Measurement & Evaluat, Ankara, Turkiye
来源
HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION | 2024年 / 39卷 / 04期
关键词
Data Mining; C4.5; Algorithm; PISA; 1018; Mathematical Literacy;
D O I
10.16986/HUJE.2024.531
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to identify the factors that most affect students' mathematical literacy in the PISA 2018 Turkey and China samples using the C4.5 algorithm. The analyses were conducted on the datasets of 5959 students from the Turkey sample and 12058 students from the China sample. The independent variables of the study are 22 student questionnaire items that are considered depending on the constructs of self-perception, adaptability, school belonging, family support and school environment. After organising the data set, the consistency ratio for the dependent variable, mathematical literacy, was calculated for both samples to evaluate the performance of the C4.5 classification. The decision tree method was then applied and reported separately for each sample. As a result of the analyses, the items that had the most impact on mathematics performance in the Turkey PISA 2018 application were determined as "I am proud that I have achieved something", "My parents support my educational efforts and achievements", and "I feel that I can manage many things at the same time" under the variables of self-perception and family support. In the Chinese sample, the items that most affected mathematics performance were "My parents support my educational efforts and achievements" and "Students seem to compete with each other" under the variables of family support and school environment.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 390
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] Otken S., 2021, The Journal of Social Science, V5, P241, DOI [10.30520/tjsosci.871481, DOI 10.30520/TJSOSCI.871481]
  • [32] Perry L. B., 2010, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, P1137
  • [33] Pinto Joaquim, 2016, Ciênc. educ. (Bauru), V22, P837, DOI 10.1590/1516-731320160040002
  • [34] Improving final grade prediction accuracy in blended learning environment using voting ensembles
    Predic, Bratislav
    Dimic, Gabrijela
    Rancic, Dejan
    Strbac, Perica
    Macek, Nemanja
    Spalevic, Petar
    [J]. COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2018, 26 (06) : 2294 - 2306
  • [35] Pujari A.K., 2001, Data Mining Techniques
  • [36] Quinlan J. R., 1986, Machine Learning, V1, P81, DOI 10.1007/BF00116251
  • [37] Satici K., 2008, Pisa 2003 sonuclarina gore matematik okuryazarligini belirleyen faktorler: Turkiye ve Hong-kong-Cin [Yayinlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi]
  • [38] Schulz W., 2015, Measuring the Socio-Economic Background of Students and Its Effect on Achievement on PISA 2000 and PISA 2003
  • [39] The relationship between school climate and students' mathematics achievement gaps in Shanghai China: Evidence from PISA 2012
    Teng, Yuan
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2020, 40 (03) : 356 - 372
  • [40] Witten IH, 2011, MOR KAUF D, P61, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-374856-0.00003-1