Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kankaya, Burak [1 ]
Buyukasik, Suleyman [1 ]
Altundal, Yusuf Emre [1 ]
Topcu, Feyza Sonmez [2 ]
Rahmanbakhsh, Paria [1 ]
Etemad, Ayden [1 ]
Kapan, Selin [1 ]
Alis, Halil [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Besyol Mah Akasya Sok 4, TR-34295 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY | 2025年 / 17卷
关键词
breast ultrasonography; mammography; breast cancer; early diagnosis; BI-RADS classification; BREAST-CANCER;
D O I
10.2147/BCTT.S481201
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Our study has three main aims: 1) to assess the distribution of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications in a cohort of Turkish women undergoing screening mammography, 2) to analyze the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up ultrasound (US) examinations, and 3) to examine the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Our goal was to evaluate potential gaps in the current breast cancer screening process by analyzing BI-RADS classifications, follow-up completion rates, and outcomes of completed ultrasound examinations. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1761 Turkish women who underwent screening mammography from 2020-2022 at the Istanbul Aydin University General Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. We assessed the distribution of BI-RADS classifications, analyzed the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up US, and examined the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Chi-square tests of independence and Spearman's rank correlation test were used to analyze the data. Results: Our study revealed three key findings: 1) Over half of mammograms (55.9%) were classified as BI-RADS 0, requiring further imaging. 2) Nearly one-third of patients who recommended US examinations (31.91%) did not complete recommended followup ultrasound appointments. 3) Among those who completed follow-up ultrasonography, almost one-third (29.7%) were reclassified as BI-RADS 3 or higher. Notably, 2.3% (n=18) were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, suggesting findings suspicious for malignancy. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the crucial role of follow-up US in breast cancer screening. The high rate of initial BI-RADS 0 classifications using mammography, coupled with the significant non-completion rate for follow-up US examinations, particularly among older age groups, highlights potential gaps in the current screening process.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management
    Chikarmane, Sona A.
    Birdwell, Robyn L.
    Poole, Patricia S.
    Sippo, Dorothy A.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (03) : 707 - 715
  • [32] Results of Short-Term Follow-Up in BI-RADS 3 and 4a Breast Lesions with a Histological Diagnosis of Fibroadenoma at Percutaneous Needle Biopsy
    Clauser, Paola
    Bazzocchi, Massimo
    Marcon, Magda
    Londero, Viviana
    Zuiani, Chiara
    BREAST CARE, 2017, 12 (04) : 238 - 242
  • [33] High rate of postoperative upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ when prioritizing ultrasound evaluation of mammography-detected lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Yung-Chun Hsieh
    Chiao Lo
    Yi-Hsuan Lee
    Ning Chien
    Tzu-Pin Lu
    Li-Wei Tsai
    Ming-Yang Wang
    Wen-Hung Kuo
    Yeun-Chung Chang
    Chiun-Sheng Huang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 21
  • [34] High rate of postoperative upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ when prioritizing ultrasound evaluation of mammography-detected lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Hsieh, Yung-Chun
    Lo, Chiao
    Lee, Yi-Hsuan
    Chien, Ning
    Lu, Tzu-Pin
    Tsai, Li-Wei
    Wang, Ming-Yang
    Kuo, Wen-Hung
    Chang, Yeun-Chung
    Huang, Chiun-Sheng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [35] Breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for breast cancer: a ten-year follow-up single-center real-world study
    Li, Wanheng
    Zheng, Yiqiong
    Wu, Huan
    Li, Xiru
    GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (07) : 1148 - 1165
  • [36] Correlation Between 18 F-FDG PET/CT Findings and BI-RADS Assessment Using Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Breast Lesions: A Multicenter Study
    Yu, Peng
    Lei, Jixiao
    Xu, Baixuan
    Wang, Ruimin
    Shen, Zhihui
    Tian, Jiahe
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 682 - 688
  • [37] Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Performed Immediately Prior to Same-Day Biopsy: An Analysis of Index Lesion Enhancement Compared to Histopathology and Follow-up in Patients With Suspicious Ultrasound Findings
    Emory, Tim
    Hoven, Noelle
    Nelson, Michael
    Church, An L.
    Rubin, Nathan
    Kuehn-Hajder, Jessica
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (01) : 40 - 47
  • [38] Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution
    Sakurai, Teruhisa
    Zhang, Ning
    Suzuma, Takaomi
    Umemura, Teiji
    Yoshimura, Goro
    Sakurai, Takeo
    Yang, Qifeng
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 30 (01)
  • [39] Underestimation of Breast Cancer Based on Ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Assessment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Retrospective Study of 296 Lesions
    Yao, Jing
    Chen, Li
    Liu, Danru
    Fu, Lina
    Wang, Yong
    Chen, Limin
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [40] Multicenter Study of Ultrasound Real-Time Tissue Elastography in 779 Cases for the Assessment of Breast Lesions: Improved Diagnostic Performance by Combining the BI-RADS®-US Classification System with Sonoelastography
    Wojcinski, S.
    Farrokh, A.
    Weber, S.
    Thomas, A.
    Fischer, T.
    Slowinski, T.
    Schmidt, W.
    Degenhardt, F.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2010, 31 (05): : 484 - 491