Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kankaya, Burak [1 ]
Buyukasik, Suleyman [1 ]
Altundal, Yusuf Emre [1 ]
Topcu, Feyza Sonmez [2 ]
Rahmanbakhsh, Paria [1 ]
Etemad, Ayden [1 ]
Kapan, Selin [1 ]
Alis, Halil [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Besyol Mah Akasya Sok 4, TR-34295 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY | 2025年 / 17卷
关键词
breast ultrasonography; mammography; breast cancer; early diagnosis; BI-RADS classification; BREAST-CANCER;
D O I
10.2147/BCTT.S481201
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Our study has three main aims: 1) to assess the distribution of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications in a cohort of Turkish women undergoing screening mammography, 2) to analyze the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up ultrasound (US) examinations, and 3) to examine the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Our goal was to evaluate potential gaps in the current breast cancer screening process by analyzing BI-RADS classifications, follow-up completion rates, and outcomes of completed ultrasound examinations. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1761 Turkish women who underwent screening mammography from 2020-2022 at the Istanbul Aydin University General Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. We assessed the distribution of BI-RADS classifications, analyzed the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up US, and examined the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Chi-square tests of independence and Spearman's rank correlation test were used to analyze the data. Results: Our study revealed three key findings: 1) Over half of mammograms (55.9%) were classified as BI-RADS 0, requiring further imaging. 2) Nearly one-third of patients who recommended US examinations (31.91%) did not complete recommended followup ultrasound appointments. 3) Among those who completed follow-up ultrasonography, almost one-third (29.7%) were reclassified as BI-RADS 3 or higher. Notably, 2.3% (n=18) were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, suggesting findings suspicious for malignancy. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the crucial role of follow-up US in breast cancer screening. The high rate of initial BI-RADS 0 classifications using mammography, coupled with the significant non-completion rate for follow-up US examinations, particularly among older age groups, highlights potential gaps in the current screening process.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Disparities Associated With Patient Adherence to BI-RADS 3 Assessment Follow-up Recommendations for Mammography and Ultrasound
    Nguyen, Derek L.
    Wilson, Benjamin M.
    Oluyemi, Eniola
    Myers, Kelly S.
    Mullen, Lisa A.
    Panigrahi, Babita
    Ambinder, Emily B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (12) : 1302 - 1309
  • [2] A Single-Center Audit of BI-RADS 3 Assessment Category Utilization in Mammography and Breast Ultrasound
    Common, Jessica
    Abdullah, Peri
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2023, 74 (01): : 69 - 77
  • [3] Breast pathology and mammography BI-RADS category correlation study - A single institute experience
    Hu, Shaomin
    Szymanski, James
    Khairy, Zeina
    Lo, Yungtai
    Wang, Yanhua
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2018, 35 : 11 - 15
  • [4] Surveillance of Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Lesions in Mammography: What Is The Right Follow-Up Protocol?
    Buch, Karen A.
    Qureshi, Muhammad M.
    Carpentier, Bianca
    Cunningham, Deborah A.
    Stone, Michael
    Jaffe, Carl
    Quinn, Marie
    Gonzalez, Carlos
    LaVoye, Justine
    Hines, Neely
    Bloch, Boris Nicolas
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [5] Follow-up results of BI-RADS 3 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study
    Aslan, Ozge
    Oktay, Aysenur
    Eroglu, Fatih
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (03): : 175 - 182
  • [6] Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound
    Chae, Eun Young
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Kim, Hak Hee
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (03) : 666 - 672
  • [7] First ultrasound diagnosis of BI-RADS 3 lesions in young patients: Can 6-months follow-up be sufficient to assess stability?
    Marcon, Magda
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    Becker, Anton S.
    Dedes, Konstantin J.
    Boss, Andreas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 89 : 226 - 233
  • [8] Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features
    Ha, Su Min
    Chae, Eun Young
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Kim, Hak Hee
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1087)
  • [9] Factors Associated With Optimal Follow-up in Women With BI-RADS 3 Breast Findings
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Wang, Aijia
    Cochon, Laila
    Giess, Catherine
    Desai, Sonali
    Eappen, Sunil
    Khorasani, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (04) : 469 - 474
  • [10] Recommendation for Short-Interval Follow-Up Examinations After a Probably Benign Assessment: Is Clinical Practice Consistent With BI-RADS Guidance?
    Bowles, Erin J. Aiello
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) : 1152 - 1159