Colonoscopy Remains an Important Option for Primary Screening for Colorectal Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Rex, Douglas K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal polyps; Screening; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CONTRAST BARIUM ENEMA; OCCULT BLOOD-TESTS; AVERAGE-RISK; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY; ASYMPTOMATIC ADULTS; CLINICAL GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-024-08760-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Colonoscopy remains the most commonly used colorectal cancer screening test in the United States. A substantial portion of the screening population value the high sensitivity of colonoscopy for precancerous colorectal lesions of all sizes, which allows it to be performed at 10 year intervals in average-risk persons with negative examinations. Emerging evidence supports the eventual endorsement of 15 year intervals for patients with normal examinations. Considerable evidence supports an impact of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, including a randomized controlled trial of colonoscopy vs. no screening, numerous case-control and cohort studies, an impact of fecal blood testing on cancer incidence, and the impact of one randomized controlled trial of flexible sigmoidoscopy on proximal colon cancer incidence. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for detection of colorectal precancerous lesions, and continues to evolve with regard to sensitivity for precancerous lesions and the effectiveness and safety of precancerous lesion resection. Gains in detection of precancerous lesions have followed from a robust movement to improve colonoscopy quality, and development of non-device techniques such as patient rotation during withdrawal, water exchange colonoscopy, and double examination of one or more colonic segments. Further, development of devices to improve mucosal exposure during withdrawal (e.g. Endocuff Vision, distal cap attachment, and Computer-Aided Quality), and devices that highlight flat lesions (e.g. chromoendoscopy, electronic chromoendoscopy, and Computer-Aided Detection) have created opportunities to achieve very high levels of detection and thereby increase the protective benefits of colonoscopy. Further, colonoscopy resection safety has improved via the widespread use of cold resection for lesions < 10 mm in size, as well as sessile serrated lesions of all sizes. Colonoscopy can be offered to patients as one of multiple options for screening, or as the test of choice for patients with the highest pre-screening probability of cancer and precancerous lesions, or as the first test offered followed by offers of other screening tests if colonoscopy is declined (sequential offers of screening). Sequential offers of screening result in overall adherence to screening similar to offering multiple options, but with a higher fraction of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Given the long-lasting protective effects of colonoscopy and its improving effectiveness and safety, colonoscopy remains a useful option for primary average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:1595 / 1605
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Colorectal Cancer Screening Is Colonoscopy the Best Option?
    Liang, Peter S.
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 103 (01) : 111 - +
  • [2] Current status of screening for colorectal cancer
    Garborg, K.
    Holme, O.
    Loberg, M.
    Kalager, M.
    Adami, H. O.
    Bretthauer, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (08) : 1963 - 1972
  • [3] The impact of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
    Alberti, Luiz Ronaldo
    Alves De Lima, David Correa
    De Lacerda Rodrigues, Kelly Cristine
    Lima Taranto, Marcos Paulo
    Leao Goncalves, Sergio Henrique
    Petroianu, Andy
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (11): : 3157 - 3162
  • [4] Colonoscopy quality control as a requirement of colorectal cancer screening
    Quintero, Enrique
    Alarcon-Fernandez, Onofre
    Jover, Rodrigo
    GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA, 2013, 36 (09): : 597 - 605
  • [5] Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Young, Patrick E.
    Womeldorph, Craig M.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 4 (03): : 217 - 226
  • [6] Effectiveness, training and quality assurance of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
    Robertson, Douglas J.
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Bretthauer, Michael
    GUT, 2015, 64 (06) : 982 - 990
  • [7] Impact of screening colonoscopy on outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Ono, Akiko
    Kakugawa, Yasuo
    Matsumoto, Minori
    Saito, Yutaka
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 45 (10) : 900 - 905
  • [8] Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Equal Access Healthcare System
    DeBarros, Mia
    Steele, Scott R.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 4 (03): : 270 - 280
  • [9] Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Current Aspects
    Triantafillidis J.K.
    Vagianos C.
    Malgarinos G.
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 6 (3) : 237 - 250
  • [10] Recent Advances in Diagnostic Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Update for Radiologists
    Hassan, Cesare
    Repici, Alessandro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (01) : 88 - 93