Life cycle optimization oriented to sustainable waste management and circular economy: A review

被引:0
作者
Zhao, Dandan [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yong [2 ]
Yuan, Haoran [2 ]
Chen, Dezhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Thermal & Environm Engn Inst, Sch Mech Engn, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
关键词
Life cycle optimization; Life cycle sustainability analysis; Multi-objective optimization; Waste management; Circular economy; Sustainable development; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; ACTIVATED CARBON PRODUCTION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL OPTIMIZATION; INDUSTRIAL NETWORKS; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; BIOMASS RESOURCES; TRADE-OFFS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2024.11.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle optimization (LCO) is an effective decision-making method combining life cycle assessment and optimization, which is capable of adjusting system configurations to meet specified sustainability goals. This study analyzed the status quo of LCO studies related to sustainable waste management and the circular economy. Most studies have focused on simultaneously optimizing environmental and economic objectives, whereas few have considered social impacts. Greenhouse gas emissions is the most commonly used environmental indicator in optimization, followed by the endpoint single-score indicator. A static deterministic model is often employed to formulate an LCO problem, while uncertainty and dynamic models are less frequently applied but cause concerns. To deal with multi-objective optimization, the epsilon-constraint method and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm are popular. Waste LCO has been mainly applied to macro system planning, such as integrated municipal solid waste management systems, biowaste supply chains, waste-to-energy systems, and waste-to- resource networks, aiming to determine optimal waste allocation, facility capacity/location, technology choice, etc. It is occasionally used in optimizing process structure, operating conditions, blending ratio of feedstocks, and product development. Future research should focus on exploring the integration of more environmental and social indicators into multi-objective optimization, modeling under uncertainty, dynamic LCO, process and product optimization, and addressing the lack of multi-scale studies.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 106
页数:18
相关论文
共 126 条
  • [61] Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters
    Liu, BD
    Iwamura, K
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 94 (02) : 227 - 237
  • [62] Optimal activated carbon production from corn pericarp: A life cycle assessment approach
    Loya-Gonzalez, Darithsa
    Loredo-Cancino, Margarita
    Soto-Regalado, Eduardo
    Rivas-Garcia, Pasiano
    de Jesus Cerino-Cordova, Felipe
    Bernardo Garcia-Reyes, Refugio
    Bustos-Martinez, Diana
    Estrada-Baltazar, Alejandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 219 : 316 - 325
  • [63] From generation to treatment: A systematic reactive nitrogen flow assessment of solid waste in China
    Luo, Zhibo
    Lam, Shu Kee
    Hu, Shanying
    Chen, Deli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 259
  • [64] A novel software for optimizing emissions and carbon credit from solid waste and wastewater management
    Maalouf, Amani
    El-Fadel, Mutasem
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 714
  • [65] Improving Municipal Solid Waste Management Strategies of Montreal (Canada) Using Life Cycle Assessment and Optimization of Technology Options
    Malmir, Tahereh
    Ranjbar, Saeed
    Eicker, Ursula
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (21)
  • [66] Sustainable design modifications municipal solid waste management network and better optimization for risk reduction analyses
    Mamashli, Zakie
    Javadian, Nikbakhsh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [67] Evaluation of Externality Costs in Life-Cycle Optimization of Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems
    Martinez-Sanchez, Veronica
    Levis, James W.
    Darrigaard, Anders
    DeCarolis, Joseph F.
    Barlaz, Morton A.
    Astrup, Thomas F.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (06) : 3119 - 3127
  • [68] Life cycle costing of waste management systems: Overview, calculation principles and case studies
    Martinez-Sanchez, Veronica
    Kromann, Mikkel A.
    Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 36 : 343 - 355
  • [69] Multi-objective optimization to improve energy, economic and, environmental life cycle assessment in waste-to-energy plant
    Mayanti, Bening
    Songok, Joel
    Helo, Petri
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 127 : 147 - 157
  • [70] Sustainable Design Approach for Modeling Bioprocesses from Laboratory toward Commercialization: Optimizing Chitosan Production
    Meramo, Samir
    Gonzalez-Delgado, angel Dario
    Sukumara, Sumesh
    Fajardo, William Stive
    Leon-Pulido, Jeffrey
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (01)