Disparities in the Use of Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Breast Cancer Diagnosis

被引:0
|
作者
Ginzberg, Sara P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Grady, Connor B. [4 ,5 ]
Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ,7 ]
Edmonds, Christine E. [6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Penn Ctr Canc Care Innovat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Penn Med, Rena Rowan Breast Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SURGICAL-TREATMENT; BODY-IMAGE; MRI; TOMOSYNTHESIS; MASTECTOMY; SURGERY; WOMEN; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINES; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1200/OP.23.00831
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after breast cancer diagnosis is increasingly used to improve locoregional staging, particularly among women with dense breasts, extensive ductal carcinoma in situ, and lobular histology. The goals of this study were to (1) assess whether use of preoperative MRI varies by race and insurance type; and (2) determine whether preoperative MRI is associated with downstream surgical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with stage 0-III breast cancer who were treated with surgical resection within our academic health system (2016-2019). Patients were categorized by race and insurance type. The primary outcome was receipt of preoperative MRI. Secondary outcomes included surgery extent (lumpectomy v mastectomy) and receipt of a second operation. RESULTS A total of 1,410 women (27% Black, 73% White; 67% private insurance, 26% Medicare, 6% Medicaid) were included. Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo preoperative MRI than White patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.54 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.76]; P < .001). There was no association between insurance type and preoperative MRI (Medicare v private: OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.52 to 1.15]; P = .208; Medicaid v private: OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.25]; P = .210). White patients who underwent preoperative MRI were less likely to undergo lumpectomy versus those who did not (OR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.76]; P < .001). Likelihood of re-excision was lower for Black women who had undergone MRI versus those who had not (OR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.93]; P = .031). CONCLUSION Black patients were less likely than White patients to undergo preoperative MRI, yet Black women who underwent MRI were less likely to require re-excision. Standardizing preoperative MRI use may mitigate provider- and system-level biases and promote more equitable care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients candidates for an intraoperative partial breast irradiation
    Tallet, Agnses
    Rua, Sandrine
    Jalaguier, Aurelie
    Boher, Jean-Marie
    Minsat, Mathieu
    Cohen, Monique
    Houvenaeghel, Gilles
    Lambaudie, Eric
    Chereau, Elisabeth
    Jauffret, Camille
    Buttarelli, Max
    Poncet, Martine
    Charafe-Jauffret, Emmanuelle
    Resbeut, Michel
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (02) : 148 - 154
  • [42] Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging identify feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients
    Liu, Liangsheng
    He, Shanshan
    Niu, Zhenhua
    Yin, Rui
    Guo, Yijun
    Dou, Zhaoxiang
    Ma, Wenjuan
    Ye, Zhaoxiang
    Lu, Hong
    GLAND SURGERY, 2024, 13 (05) : 640 - 653
  • [43] Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Eisen, Andrea
    Fletcher, Glenn G.
    Fienberg, Samantha
    George, Ralph
    Holloway, Claire
    Kulkarni, Supriya
    Seely, Jean M.
    Muradali, Derek
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2024, 75 (01): : 118 - 135
  • [44] Disparities in preoperative imaging for breast cancer: Not so black and white
    Bleicher, Richard J.
    Ruth, Karen
    Sigurdson, Elin R.
    Evers, Kathryn
    Crivello, Margaret Lord
    Wong, Yu-Ning
    Boraas, Marcia
    Egleston, Brian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [45] Magnetic resonance imaging and its role in the diagnosis of multicentric breast cancer
    Krämer, S
    Schulz-Wendtland, R
    Hagedorn, K
    Bautz, W
    Lang, N
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 1998, 18 (3C) : 2163 - 2164
  • [46] Efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis combined with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of early breast cancer
    Ren, Yun
    Zhang, Jiao
    Zhang, Jin-Dan
    Xu, Jian-Zhong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (28) : 10042 - 10052
  • [47] Efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis combined with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of early breast cancer
    Yun Ren
    Jiao Zhang
    Jin-Dan Zhang
    Jian-Zhong Xu
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2022, 10 (28) : 10042 - 10052
  • [48] Unenhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging: detection of breast cancer
    Belli, P.
    Bufi, E.
    Bonatesta, A.
    Patrolecco, F.
    Padovano, F.
    Giuliani, M.
    Rinaldi, P.
    Bonomo, L.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (20) : 4220 - 4229
  • [49] Impact of magnetic resonance on breast cancer preoperative staging
    Martinez-Cecilia, David
    Alonso Gomez, Jaime
    Diaz Nieto, Rafael
    Rioja Torres, Pilar
    Arjona Sanchez, Alvaro
    Ciria Bru, Ruben
    Gomez Alvarez, Manuel
    Rufian Pena, Sebastian
    Alvarez Benito, Marina
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (03) : S122 - S122
  • [50] Breast imaging in the young: the role of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening, diagnosis and follow-up
    Salem, Dorria Saleh
    Kamal, Rasha Mohamed
    Mansour, Sahar Mahmoud
    Salah, Lamiaa Adel
    Wessam, Rasha
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2013, 5 : S9 - S18