Shoot the moving target: A dynamic perspective on optimal distinctiveness and strategic repositioning

被引:0
作者
Wang, Pengfei [1 ]
Shi, Yanlin [2 ]
机构
[1] BI Norwegian Business Sch, Dept Strategy & Entrepreneurship, Oslo, Norway
[2] Macquarie Univ, Dept Actuarial Studies & Business Analyt, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Strategic positioning; Repositioning; Optimal distinctiveness; Simulation; PERFORMANCE; COMPETITION; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; ANTECEDENTS; ADAPTATION; ASPIRATION; INDUSTRY; SEARCH; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
How efficacious is the strategy of pursuing optimal distinctiveness (OD)? Scholars have long strived to identify the optimal positions for firms in the market and advocate them to realign themselves accordingly. While plausible, however, prior literature overlooks the process of repositioning towards OD and the dynamic nature of market landscape. Specifically, if all firms reposition simultaneously, current optimal positions could become inferior, such that firms that deliberately move towards OD (OD firms) may get backfired. Emphasizing the dynamics, we utilize a parsimonious agent-based simulation to explore the efficacy of repositioning towards OD. The results indicate that across different scenarios, a significant proportion of OD firms end up experiencing repositioning failure and fail to improve their performance. More importantly, we underscore that the efficacy of repositioning towards OD depends largely on market conditions. It is particularly undermined in markets with more competitors seeking distinctiveness and/or fewer competitors aiming for conformity (e.g., markets with greater leniency). Experimenting with different approaches firms can take to pursue OD, we also find that exploratory repositioning performs better than exploitative repositioning. Finally, our extensional analyses offer further insights by integrating repositioning costs, sequential repositioning, alternative optimal locations, and random explorers.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Positioning on a Multiattribute Landscape
    Adner, Ron
    Csaszar, Felipe A.
    Zemsky, Peter B.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 60 (11) : 2794 - 2815
  • [2] Strategic responses to shocks: Comparative adjustment costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs
    Argyres, Nicholas
    Mahoney, Joseph T.
    Nickerson, Jackson
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 40 (03) : 357 - 376
  • [3] The Red Queen, success bias, and organizational inertia
    Barnett, William P.
    Pontikes, Elizabeth G.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (07) : 1237 - 1251
  • [4] Barnett WP, 2004, ADMIN SCI QUART, V49, P535
  • [5] LOCALIZED COMPETITION AND ORGANIZATIONAL FAILURE IN THE MANHATTAN HOTEL INDUSTRY, 1898-1990
    BAUM, JAC
    MEZIAS, SJ
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (04) : 580 - 604
  • [6] Search on Rugged Landscapes: An Experimental Study
    Billinger, Stephan
    Stieglitz, Nils
    Schumacher, Terry R.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (01) : 93 - 108
  • [7] Carroll G. R., 2000, The demography of corporations and industries
  • [8] Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets
    Cennamo, Carmelo
    Santalo, Juan
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (11) : 1331 - 1350
  • [9] Agglomeration effects and performance: A test of the Texas lodging industry
    Chung, W
    Kalnins, A
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (10) : 969 - 988
  • [10] Inflexible Repositioning: Commitment in Competition and Uncertainty
    Cong, Jiajia
    Zhou, Wen
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (09) : 4207 - 4225