Adaptation of plantations to drought events in arid and semi-arid regions: Evidence from tree resilience

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Xu [1 ]
Chen, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Shao, Taoying [3 ]
Zhang, Guangqi [4 ]
Duan, Qiuxiao [1 ]
Wang, Xiaochun [5 ]
Cao, Yang [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Forestry, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[2] Ctr Ecol Res & Forestry Applicat, Barcelona 08193, Spain
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Soil & Water Conservat Sci & Engn, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Lorraine, Ctr Rech Grand Est Nancy, SILVA, INRAE,AgroParisTech, F-54280 Champenoux, France
[5] Northeast Forestry Univ, Sch Ecol, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
关键词
Dendroecology; Drought; Forest plantations; Resistance; Recovery; LOESS PLATEAU; CARBON BALANCE; DOUGLAS-FIR; MORTALITY; SOIL; TEMPERATURE; MECHANISMS; FORESTS; DECLINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122437
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Increasing drought frequency and severity pose a significant risk to global forest plantations, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. Developing drought-adaptive plantations is particularly important for vegetation restoration in the context of climate warming. Despite the importance of drought response and adaptation, systematic research on these aspects for major tree species remains limited. Here, we collected 467 tree ring cores from eight paired sites of Robinia pseudoacacia L. (a broad-leaved species) and Pinus tabulaeformis C. (a coniferous species) plantations across a typical semi-arid region of the Loess Plateau (LP) to discern the climate-growth patterns of both species using linear mixed models. We employed hypothesis testing to analyze the differences in tree resilience metrics, including drought resistance and recovery ability, and linear mixed models combined with partial least squares path analysis to clarify the driving factors of tree resilience between R. pseudoacacia and P. tabulaeformis. Our findings demonstrated that Palmer Drought Severity Indices is the key limiting climate factor, without spatial variation, on the growth of R. pseudoacacia and P. tabulaeformis, explaining 47.7 % and 69.8 % of the variables effect percentage, respectively. Compared to P. tabulaeformis, R. pseudoacacia is more limited by atmospheric drought stress and soil moisture, with 11.0 % and 17.9 % of the explained effect percentage, respectively. R. pseudoacacia exhibited lower drought resistance ability, evidenced by a lower resistance (the average value is 0.62) and a higher average growth reduction (0.20) than P. tabulaeformis (0.85 and 0.17, respectively). In contrast, R. pseudoacacia had higher drought recovery ability, evidenced by a higher recovery (the average value is 1.19), a shorter recovery period (1.0), and a faster average recovery rate (0.14), than P. tabulaeformis (1.07, 2.0, and 0.08, respectively). Importantly, all tree resilience metrics for both species exhibited spatial consistency across the LP. Tree characteristics had a stronger effect on drought resistance and recovery ability in R. pseudoacacia than in P. tabulaeformis. Soil properties improved R. pseudoacacia drought resistance ability and reduced its drought recovery ability, but had weaker effects on P. tabulaeformis. Additionally, tree size and age strongly influence tree resilience in R. pseudoacacia through preceding year tree growth of drought events and climate sensitivity. These findings underscore the complementary drought resilience of broad-leaved and coniferous species, emphasizing the necessity for adaptive plantations and diversified tree species plantations as a strategic response to the anticipated increase in drought frequency and severity in arid and semi-arid regions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unsustainability Syndrome-From Meteorological to Agricultural Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions
    Haghighi, Ali Torabi
    Abou Zaki, Nizar
    Rossi, Pekka M.
    Noori, Roohollah
    Hekmatzadeh, Ali Akbar
    Saremi, Hossein
    Klove, Bjorn
    WATER, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [2] USES OF TREE LEGUMES IN SEMI-ARID REGIONS
    FELKER, P
    ECONOMIC BOTANY, 1981, 35 (02) : 174 - 186
  • [3] Drought, change and resilience in South Africa's arid and semi-arid rangelands
    Vetter, Susanne
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2009, 105 (1-2) : 29 - 33
  • [4] Adaptation to drought in arid and semi-arid environments: Case of the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe
    Mavhura, Emmanuel
    Manatsa, Desmond
    Mushore, Terence
    JAMBA-JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK STUDIES, 2015, 7 (01):
  • [5] LEGUMINOUS COVER CROPS FOR BANANA PLANTATIONS IN SEMI-ARID REGIONS
    Lima Quaresma, Mateus Augusto
    de Oliveira, Fabio Luiz
    Natal da Silva, Diego Mathias
    REVISTA CAATINGA, 2017, 30 (03) : 614 - 621
  • [6] Groundwater management in arid and semi-arid regions
    Mohammad Ghadir Zamani
    Ali Moridi
    Jafar Yazdi
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (4)
  • [7] Waste biorefinery in arid/semi-arid regions
    Bastidas-Oyanedel, Juan-Rodrigo
    Fang, Chuanji
    Almardeai, Saleha
    Javid, Usama
    Yousuf, Ahasa
    Schmidt, Jens Ejbye
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 215 : 21 - 28
  • [8] WATER CONSERVATION IN ARID AND SEMI-ARID REGIONS
    AKKAD, AA
    DESALINATION, 1989, 72 (1-2) : 185 - 205
  • [9] HERBIVORY IN ARID AND SEMI-ARID REGIONS OF ARGENTINA
    BUCHER, EH
    REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL, 1987, 60 (02) : 265 - 273
  • [10] Analysis of Drought from Humid, Semi-Arid and Arid Regions of India Using DrinC Model with Different Drought Indices
    Surendran, U.
    Anagha, B.
    Raja, P.
    Kumar, V.
    Rajan, K.
    Jayakumar, M.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (04) : 1521 - 1540