Central Bank Digital Currencies and International Crises: Toward an Authoritarian International Monetary Order?

被引:1
作者
Marmefelt, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sodertorn Univ, Dept Econ, Huddinge, Sweden
[2] Abo Akad Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Turku, Finland
关键词
blockchain; digital currencies; Covid-19; cryptocurrencies; monetary system; Russia-Ukraine war; sanctions; stablecoins;
D O I
10.17645/pag.8540
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) may be viewed as an adaptive response to a perceived threat from stablecoins, but international crises matter. Covid-19 induced a top-down digital transformation of the economy, a more state-led economy with contact-free payments, while Russia's subsequent war in Ukraine and the Western sanctions against Russia have further increased the incentive to use blockchain technology and CBDCs as political enterprises to neutralize the effects of sanctions, and thereby as weapons in economic warfare. This article considers Covid-19 as a turning point, amplified by Russia's war in Ukraine, and applies fiscal sociology to analyze the use of blockchain, cryptocurrencies, and CBDCs as policy tools to establish economic and political hegemony, where CBDCs may contribute to the emergence of an authoritarian international monetary order. A fragmented order, involving conflict between an autocratic society bloc and an open society bloc, would be feasible, but such a conflict may make open societies more authoritarian. In open societies, cryptocurrencies and stablecoins belong to the market square, while CBDCs belong to the public square, but CBDCs may blur the boundaries of those squares, submitting the market square to the public square. Payment systems may become public-private partnerships controlled by central banks, turning the squares into fortresses and transforming them from open access orders to limited access orders.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Ahnert T., 2022, 2713 ECB
[2]  
Amato M., 2020, A Fistful of Bitcoins: The Risks and Opportunities of Virtual Currencies, VNone
[3]  
[Anonymous], 114 The tensions between China, Japan, the U.S., and England become significantly compounded when considered in combination with the socio-political events at the end of the 19th century and at the beginning of the 20th century. When Fenollosa visited Japan in 1896, the First Sino-Japanese War had just ended a year ago, in April 1895, which for China revealed how corrupt and ineffective the government and policies were under the Qing Dynasty. Japan, on the other hand, had displayed
[4]  
and 2) it marked a crucial shift in the U.S. presidential powers that would use military force against non-governmental organizations without Congressional authorization (President McKinley sent five thousand U.S. troops to assuage the rebellion). Japan, meanwhile, invaded Taiwan shortly after the Treaty of Shimonoseki, sustaining heavy casualties during the months between May and October in 1895. By 1915, the Qing Dynasty had been overthrown during the Wuchang Rising in Wuhan, and the Republic
[5]  
Arner D. W., 2020, EBI Working Paper No. 65
[6]  
Auer R A, BIS Papers, V70
[7]  
Bank for International Settlements, 2022, Annual Economic Report
[8]  
Bank for International Settlements SIX Group & Swiss National Bank, 2020, Project Helvetia: Settling tokenised assets in central bank money
[9]  
Bank of Canada Bank of England Bank of Japan European Central Bank Federal Reserve Sveriges Riksbank Swiss National Bank & Bank for International Settlements, 2020, Central bank digital currencies. Foundational principles and core features
[10]  
Benes J, 2012, IMF WORKING PAPER