Factors influencing the variability in performance of cattle grazing tropical pasture

被引:0
作者
Charmley, E. [1 ]
Bishop-Hurley, G. J. [2 ]
McSweeney, C. S. [2 ]
Takeuchi, R. [2 ]
Martinez-Fernandez, G. [2 ]
Denman, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Agr & Food, Private Mail Bag PO Aitkenvale, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia
[2] CSIRO Agr & Food, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
关键词
animal performance; beef cattle; feed efficiency; grazing behaviour; intake; nutritive value; pasture; tropical; MICROBIAL PROTEIN-PRODUCTION; BEEF-CATTLE; NORTHERN AUSTRALIA; RETENTION TIME; PADDOCK SIZE; GRASS; RUMEN; EFFICIENCY; DIGESTIBILITY; PREFERENCE;
D O I
10.1071/AN24203
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Context. Whereas it is known that there is variation in liveweight gain (described as performance in this paper) within a group of grazing cattle, the causes of this variation are not well understood. Aim A 2-year grazing study in northern Queensland was conducted to understand the relative influence of diet selection, grazing behaviour and rumen fermentation on variation in performance of growing cattle. Methods. Eighty-nine Bos taurus x B. indicus (similar to 6 months old) growing steers were grazed as a group on mixed tropical pasture for 23 months. Pasture was characterised for biomass, species and nutrient composition. Cattle were ranked according to overall liveweight (LW) gain and the top (high performance, HP) 20 and bottom (low performance, LP) 20 head were compared for diet composition, rumen fermentation and grazing behaviours. Results. Pasture biomass, and nutritive value of pasture and diet varied between seasons and years of study. The HP cattle achieved overall LW gains 20% greater than those of the LP cattle mainly due to higher rates of gain in the wet season. However, the nutritive value and rumen fermentation characteristics were similar for both LP and HP cattle, although there was evidence that crude protein and digestibility were modestly higher in diets of HP cattle, especially in the first wet season. Activity, measured as distance travelled, declined as pasture biomass declined, and cattle appeared to favour pasture with higher legume content. Conclusion. It is concluded that divergence in performance of cattle on tropical pasture could not be fully explained by measurements taken in this study. Diet selection for plant components with improved nutritive value probably played a small role. Differences in initial LW between the LP and HP groups may have been a contributory factor. Implications Despite comprehensive measurements of factors that influence efficiency and performance on pasture, we were unable to identify definitive causes. Genetic variation in feed intake or efficiency of digestion needs to be investigated.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Animal behavior classification via deep learning on embedded systems
    Arablouei, Reza
    Wang, Liang
    Currie, Lachlan
    Yates, Jodan
    Alvarenga, Flavio A. P.
    Bishop-Hurley, Greg J.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2023, 207
  • [2] Comparison of methane production between C3 and C4 grasses and legumes
    Archimede, H.
    Eugene, M.
    Magdeleine, C. Marie
    Boval, M.
    Martin, C.
    Morgavi, D. P.
    Lecomte, P.
    Doreau, M.
    [J]. ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 59 - 64
  • [3] Feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle: overview of recent Australian research and challenges for the future
    Arthur, PF
    Archerr, JA
    Herd, RM
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2004, 44 (4-5) : 361 - 369
  • [4] Research, development and adoption for the north Australian beef cattle breeding industry: an analysis of needs and gaps
    Bell, Alan
    Sangster, Nicholas
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2023, 63 (01) : 1 - 40
  • [5] Defoliation patterns and their implications for the management of vegetative tropical pastures to control intake and diet quality by cattle
    Benvenutti, M. A.
    Pavetti, D. R.
    Poppi, D. P.
    Gordon, I. J.
    Cangiano, C. A.
    [J]. GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2016, 71 (03) : 424 - 436
  • [6] LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF FEEDING DURING CALFHOOD ON SUBSEQUENT PERFORMANCE IN BEEF-CATTLE (A REVIEW)
    BERGE, P
    [J]. LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1991, 28 (03): : 179 - 201
  • [7] The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 3. Annual liveweight gains from pasture based systems
    Bortolussi, G
    McIvor, JG
    Hodgkinson, JJ
    Coffey, SG
    Holmes, CR
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2005, 45 (09) : 1093 - 1108
  • [8] Bowen MK, 2017, ANIM PROD SCI, V57, P1702, DOI [10.1071/AN15535, 10.1071/an15535]
  • [9] The application of virtual fencing technology effectively herds cattle and sheep
    Campbell, D. L. M.
    Marini, D.
    Lea, J. M.
    Keshavarzi, H.
    Dyall, T. R.
    Lee, C.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2021, 61 (13) : 1393 - 1402
  • [10] Review: Biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle
    Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G.
    Abo-Ismail, M.
    Carstens, G. E.
    Guan, L. L.
    Hegarty, R.
    Kenny, D. A.
    Mcgee, M.
    Plastow, G.
    Relling, A.
    Ortigues-Marty, I.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2018, 12 : S321 - S335