PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS OF THRESHOLDING-BASED INTERFERENCE MITIGATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE RADAR SYSTEMS

被引:0
作者
Li, Jun [1 ]
Youn, Jihwan [2 ]
Wu, Ryan [1 ]
Overdevest, Jeroen [2 ]
Sun, Shunqiao [3 ]
机构
[1] NXP Semicond, San Jose, CA 95134 USA
[2] NXP Semicond, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
来源
2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING WORKSHOPS, ICASSPW 2024 | 2024年
关键词
Automotive radar; interference mitigation; timefrequency analysis; CFAR detection; AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES;
D O I
10.1109/ICASSPW62465.2024.10627325
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In automotive radar, time-domain thresholding (TD-TH) and time-frequency domain thresholding (TFD-TH) are crucial techniques underpinning numerous interference mitigation methods. Despite their importance, comprehensive evaluations of these methods in dense traffic scenarios with different types of interference are limited. In this study, we segment automotive radar interference into three distinct categories. Utilizing the in-house traffic scenario and automotive radar simulator, we evaluate interference mitigation methods across multiple metrics: probability of detection, signalto-interference-plus-noise ratio, and phase error involving hundreds of targets and dozens of interfering radars. The numerical results highlight that TFD-TH is more effective than TD-TH, particularly as the density and signal correlation of interfering radars escalate.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 208
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Interference in Automotive Radar Systems Characteristics, mitigation techniques, and current and future research [J].
Allond, Stephen ;
Stark, Wayne ;
Ali, Murtaza ;
Hegde, Manju .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2019, 36 (05) :45-59
[2]  
Bechter J, 2017, EUROP RADAR CONF, P90, DOI 10.23919/EURAD.2017.8249154
[3]   The Rise of Radar for Autonomous Vehicles Signal processing solutions and future research directions [J].
Bilik, Igal ;
Longman, Oren ;
Villeval, Shahar ;
Tabrikian, Joseph .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2019, 36 (05) :20-31
[4]  
Boashash B, 2003, TIME FREQUENCY SIGNAL ANALYSIS AND PROCESSING: A COMPREHENSIVE REFERENCE, P627
[5]  
Fischer Christoph, 2016, Untersuchungen zum interferenzverhalten automobiler radarsensorik
[6]   SPATIAL-DOMAIN INTERFERENCE MITIGATION FOR SLOW-TIME MIMO-FMCW AUTOMOTIVE RADAR [J].
Jin, Sian ;
Wang, Pu ;
Boufounos, Petros ;
Orlik, Philip V. ;
Takahashi, Ryuhei ;
Roy, Sumit .
2022 IEEE 12TH SENSOR ARRAY AND MULTICHANNEL SIGNAL PROCESSING WORKSHOP (SAM), 2022, :311-315
[7]   Enhanced Interference Detection Method in Automotive FMCW Radar Systems [J].
Laghezza, Francesco ;
Jansen, Feike ;
Overdevest, Jeroen .
2019 20TH INTERNATIONAL RADAR SYMPOSIUM (IRS), 2019,
[8]   Bayesian Linear Regression With Cauchy Prior and Its Application in Sparse MIMO Radar [J].
Li, Jun ;
Wu, Ryan ;
Lu, I-Tai ;
Ren, Dongyin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2023, 59 (06) :9576-9597
[9]  
Marvasti F., 2012, 2012 19 INT C TEL IC, P1
[10]   Interference Mitigation in FMCW Automotive Radars using the Short-Time Fourier Transform and L-Statistics [J].
Muja, Robert ;
Anghel, Andrei ;
Cacoveanu, Remus ;
Ciochina, Silviu .
2022 IEEE RADAR CONFERENCE (RADARCONF'22), 2022,