The Impact of Accountability for Energy Efficiency Targets on Labor Demand of Enterprises: Evidence from China's Top-1000 Energy-Saving Program

被引:0
作者
Yu, Yiwen [1 ]
Ding, Lili [2 ]
Nie, Yongyou [1 ]
Pan, Yun [3 ]
Jiao, Zheng [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] Landscaping & City Appearance Adm Bur Minhang Dist, Shanghai 201199, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ, Sch Environm & Chem Engn, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ, Radiol Applicat Res Inst, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
关键词
the Top-1000 Energy-Saving Program; labor demand; energy saving and emission reduction; difference-in-differences (DID) method; CLEAN-AIR ACT; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; REALLOCATION EVIDENCE; PRODUCTIVITY; REGULATIONS; EMPLOYMENT; INNOVATION; POLLUTION; SECTOR; GREEN;
D O I
10.3390/su16219447
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To control energy consumption, China issued the environmental regulation policy of the Top-1000 Energy-Saving Program in 2006, and it remains to be examined whether this policy will impact enterprises' labor demand while promoting energy conservation and consumption reduction. Based on the panel data of Chinese enterprises (2000-2010), this study employs the difference-in-differences (DID) method to investigate the impact of the Top-1000 Energy-Saving Program on the labor demand of enterprises. It is found that the policy significantly reduces enterprises' labor demand, a finding that passes several robustness tests. Second, the effects of the policy show heterogeneity across enterprises of various sizes, ownership structures, and regions. Finally, the mechanism analysis verifies the existence of an output effect leading to a decline in enterprises' labor demand, while the substitution effect manifests itself in the substitution of enterprises' labor demand with the increase of capital and technological innovation. This study provides important empirical evidence for the improvement of energy efficiency policies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   The employment and income effects of cleaner coal: the case of FutureGen and rural illinois [J].
Altman, Ira ;
Hunter, Amy McMorrow .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2015, 17 (06) :1475-1485
[2]   A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis [J].
Ambec, S ;
Barla, P .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 75 (03) :355-360
[3]   Environmental regulation and labor demand: evidence from the South Coast Air Basin [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 79 (02) :265-295
[4]   Market-oriented environmental regulations, employment adjustment and transfer path: Quasi-experimental evidence from China's carbon emissions trading pilot [J].
Bu, Tao ;
Du, Wenhao ;
Tang, Chengxiang ;
Liu, Yahong ;
Wang, Xinyuan ;
Wang, Yueheng ;
Tang, Daisheng .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 369
[5]   Development of green business strategies through green dynamic capabilities and environmental regulation: Empirical evidence from the construction sector [J].
Chen, Chuhan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 438
[6]   The green innovation effect of urban energy saving construction: A quasi-natural experiment from new energy demonstration city policy [J].
Chen, Ming ;
Su, Yutong ;
Piao, Zaixu ;
Zhu, Jianhua ;
Yue, Xiaoguang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 428
[8]   The good, the bad, and the ugly: Technology transfer competence, rent-seeking, and bargaining power [J].
Ciabuschi, Francesco ;
Dellestrand, Henrik ;
Kappen, Philip .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2012, 47 (04) :664-674
[9]   Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector [J].
Cole, MA ;
Elliott, RJR ;
Shimamoto, K .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 50 (01) :121-143
[10]  
Cui G.H., 2019, Ind. Econ. Res., V1, P99