Ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestion effluent using membrane distillation: Membrane fouling at different water vapor transfer scenarios

被引:3
作者
Shi, Mingfei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
He, Qingyao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Ruobing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sheng, Zengxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Hongzhen [4 ]
Meers, Erik [4 ]
Yan, Shuiping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Engn, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Agr Univ, Technol & Equipment Ctr Carbon Neutral Agr, 1 Shizishan St, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Agr Equipment Midlower Yangtze River, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Green Chem & Technol, Resource Lab Biobased Resource Recovery, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anaerobic digestion effluent; Ammonia recovery; Water vapor transfer; Direct contact membrane distillation; Membrane fouling; NITROGEN; REMOVAL; FLUX;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2024.159098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Membrane fouling and its effect on ammonia recovery performance during anaerobic digestion (AD) effluent treatment were systematically investigated under a high water vapor transfer (i.e., conventional direct contact membrane distillation, DCMD) and a low water vapor transfer (i.e., isothermal DCMD) conditions. For the conventional DCMD scenario, three commercial hydrophobic membranes including 0.22 mu m pore-sized PP (PP0.22), 0.22 mu m pore-sized PTFE (PTFE-0.22), and 0.65 mu m pore-sized PTFE (PTFE-0.65), were evaluated to determine the influence of membrane properties on the mass transfer and membrane fouling behaviors. In a 4-h DCMD experiment, PTFE-0.65 treatment achieved the highest water and ammonia mass transfer, followed by PTFE-0.22 and PP-0.22 treatments. However, during a 12-d AD effluent treatment, the PTFE-0.65 treatment exhibited the largest decline in water flux (62.22 %), compared to PTFE-0.22 treatment (41.56 %) and PP-0.22 treatment (36.54 %). A similar trend was observed for the ammonia mass transfer coefficient, with the greatest reduction in PTFE-0.65 treatment (93.28 %), followed by PP-0.22 treatment (84.87 %), while PTFE-0.22 treatment showed a significantly smaller decrease (40 %). This smaller reduction in PTFE-0.22 treatment was attributed to its high porosity, which enhanced transmembrane ammonia transfer. The results showed that under a high water vapor transfer condition, a high initial water flux resulted in a high flux decline, indicating more severe membrane fouling, which was further supported by the highest concentration of foulants in the cleaning solution from PTFE-0.65 treatment, followed by PTFE-0.22 and PP-0.22 treatments. Comparatively, under an isothermal DCMD scenario, ammonia recovery remained stable over 25 days with a minimal fouling, highlighting the effectiveness of reduced water vapor transfer in mitigating the membrane fouling.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Membrane distillation: A comprehensive review [J].
Alkhudhiri, Abdullah ;
Darwish, Naif ;
Hilal, Nidal .
DESALINATION, 2012, 287 :2-18
[2]   High flux and antifouling properties of negatively charged membrane for dyeing wastewater treatment by membrane distillation [J].
An, Alicia Kyoungjin ;
Guo, Jiaxin ;
Jeong, Sanghyun ;
Lee, Eui-Jong ;
Tabatabai, S. Assiyeh Alizadeh ;
Leiknes, TorOve .
WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 103 :362-371
[3]   Principles and applications of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD): A comprehensive review [J].
Ashoor, B. B. ;
Mansour, S. ;
Giwa, A. ;
Dufour, V. ;
Hasan, S. W. .
DESALINATION, 2016, 398 :222-246
[4]   Fouling and wetting in the membrane distillation driven wastewater reclamation process - A review [J].
Choudhury, Mahbuboor Rahman ;
Anwar, Nawrin ;
Jassby, David ;
Rahaman, Md. Saifur .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2019, 269 :370-399
[5]   Preparation and characterization of novel modified PVDF-HFP/GO/ODS composite hollow fiber membrane for Caspian Sea water desalination [J].
Dastbaz, Abolfazl ;
Karimi-Sabet, Javad ;
Ahadi, Hossein ;
Amini, Younes .
DESALINATION, 2017, 424 :62-73
[6]   Elucidating the inherent fouling tolerance of membrane contactors for ammonia recovery from wastewater [J].
Dutta, Abhishek ;
Kalam, Sifat ;
Lee, Jongho .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2022, 645
[7]   Application of vacuum membrane distillation for ammonia removal [J].
EL-Bourawi, M. S. ;
Khayet, M. ;
Ma, R. ;
Ding, Z. ;
Li, Z. ;
Zhang, X. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2007, 301 (1-2) :200-209
[8]   Transmembrane chemical absorption technology for ammonia recovery from wastewater: A critical review [J].
Gonzalez-Salgado, Irene ;
Guigui, Christelle ;
Sperandio, Mathieu .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 444
[9]   Comparison of ammonia emissions related to nitrogen use efficiency of livestock production in Europe [J].
Groenestein, C. M. ;
Hutchings, N. J. ;
Haenel, H. D. ;
Amon, B. ;
Menzi, H. ;
Mikkelsen, M. H. ;
Misselbrook, T. H. ;
van Bruggen, C. ;
Kupper, T. ;
Webb, J. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 :1162-1170
[10]   Membrane distillation of NaCl solution containing natural organic matter [J].
Gryta, M ;
Tomaszewska, M ;
Grzechulska, J ;
Morawski, AW .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2001, 181 (02) :279-287