Differences and Relationships Between Teachers' Pedagogical Beliefs and Teaching Strategies Used at Different School Levels in Japan

被引:0
作者
Fukuda, Mari [1 ,4 ]
Fukaya, Tatsushi [2 ]
Kusumi, Takashi [3 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Kyoto, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Kyoto, Japan
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
active learning; teaching strategies; beliefs about teaching and learning; school levels; SELF-EXPLANATION; MATHEMATICS; STUDENTS; EDUCATION; METAANALYSIS; ACHIEVEMENT; SCIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/21582440241281852
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Existing meta-analyses have shown that active learning strategies are effective in improving students' learning performance. However, their implementation may vary across school levels. This study investigated differences among elementary, middle, and high school teachers in the use of teaching strategies, including those that promote active learning and pedagogical beliefs. We also explored differences in the relationships between beliefs about teaching and learning, teaching experience, and teaching strategies for active learning across school levels. An online survey was conducted with 550 in-service elementary, middle, and high school teachers. Participants completed a questionnaire that measured their teaching strategies, beliefs about teaching and learning, and teaching experience. The results revealed differences in the frequency of use of six teaching strategies, including those that promoted active learning. Elementary school teachers used teaching strategies that promoted active learning most frequently, followed by middle and high school teachers. There were no differences in teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning across school levels. Multigroup structural equation modeling indicated no differences in the influence of beliefs about teaching and learning on active learning teaching strategies among school levels, except that the traditional conception was negatively associated with the implementation of active learning in middle school. Constructivist beliefs were positively associated with active learning strategies across all levels, whereas teaching experience was negatively associated with teaching strategies that promoted student output at the higher school level. These findings have implications for the implementation of active learning, particularly at higher school levels. Different teaching methods across school levels in JapanAmong the various teaching methods, some involve more active student engagement through activities such as explanations and discussions among students, known as active learning. However, previous research has highlighted differences in the frequency of teaching methods that teachers use at different school levels. This study investigated how elementary, middle, and high school teachers apply different teaching methods, and perceive teaching and learning. In-service Japanese teachers (N = 550) participated in the study. The findings indicated that teachers across different school levels employed six teaching methods, encompassing those involving students' active learning. Among these levels, elementary school teachers most frequently employed teaching methods that encouraged students' active engagement, followed by middle and high school teachers. When examining the reasons behind the choice of teaching methods, no significant differences were found between school levels, except that their beliefs emphasized that traditional teaching approaches were associated with the reduced use of active learning methods in middle school. On the other hand, beliefs that prioritize student-driven understanding are linked to the use of active learning methods across all school levels. Furthermore, teachers with more experience tended to use these methods less frequently at higher school levels. These findings have significant implications for the effective implementation of active learning, particularly in high school education.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, TALIS 2018 results (volume I): teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners, DOI DOI 10.1787/19CF08DF-EN
  • [2] Arik S., 2020, International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, V10, P44
  • [3] Bereiter C., 1998, The handbook of education and human development, P463
  • [4] Teaching methods and their impact on students' emotions in mathematics: an experience-sampling approach
    Bieg, Madeleine
    Goetz, Thomas
    Sticca, Fabio
    Brunner, Esther
    Becker, Eva
    Morger, Vinzenz
    Hubbard, Kyle
    [J]. ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2017, 49 (03): : 411 - 422
  • [5] Inducing Self-Explanation: a Meta-Analysis
    Bisra, Kiran
    Liu, Qing
    Nesbit, John C.
    Salimi, Farimah
    Winne, Philip H.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2018, 30 (03) : 703 - 725
  • [6] Bonwell C. C., 1991, Active Llearning: Creating excitement in the classroom
  • [7] The outcomes of learner-centred pedagogy: A systematic review
    Bremner, Nicholas
    Sakata, Nozomi
    Cameron, Leanne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 94
  • [8] Does Teaching Experience Matter? The Beliefs and Practices of Beginning and Experienced Physics Teachers
    Caleon, Imelda S.
    Tan, Yuen Sze Michelle
    Cho, Young Hoan
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2018, 48 (01) : 117 - 149
  • [9] Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning
    Chan, KW
    Elliott, RG
    [J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2004, 20 (08) : 817 - 831
  • [10] Translating the ICAP Theory of Cognitive Engagement Into Practice
    Chi, Michelene T. H.
    Adams, Joshua
    Bogusch, Emily B.
    Bruchok, Christiana
    Kang, Seokmin
    Lancaster, Matthew
    Levy, Roy
    Li, Na
    McEldoon, Katherine L.
    Stump, Glenda S.
    Wylie, Ruth
    Xu, Dongchen
    Yaghmourian, David L.
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2018, 42 (06) : 1777 - 1832