Are all mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancers created equal? A large, retrospective, tertiary center experience

被引:0
|
作者
Capasso, Ilaria [1 ]
Perrone, Emanuele [1 ]
Duranti, Simona [1 ]
Giannarelli, Diana [2 ]
Nero, Camilla [1 ]
Cordisco, Emanuela Lucci [3 ]
Pomponi, Maria Grazia [3 ]
Remondini, Laura [3 ]
Piermattei, Alessia [4 ]
Valente, Michele [4 ]
Santoro, Angela [4 ]
Esposito, Giovanni [1 ]
Parisi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Giuliano, Maria Consiglia [1 ]
Corrado, Martina [1 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [1 ]
Fanfani, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Dept Women Children & Publ Hlth Sci, Gynecol Oncol Unit, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Dept Biostat, Rome, Italy
[3] Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Dept Genet, Rome, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Dept Pathol, Rome, Italy
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Mismatch repair deficiency; Immunohistochemistry; Methylation; Molecular classification; Survival; LYNCH SYNDROME; IDENTIFICATION; PREVALENCE; MUTATION; PROFILE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115344
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: One third of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) presents with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Of these, 70 % are caused by somatic hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter; the remaining cases are determined by Lynch syndrome or double somatic inactivation of MMR genes. Although associated with good-intermediate prognosis, heterogeneity in treatment response and survival has been reported among MMRd ECs. We aim to investigate differences in pathologic aggressiveness and event-free survival (EFS) among three MMRd EC subtypes, classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 methylation analysis. Methods: Subjects undergone surgical staging for EC were retrospectively included. IHC analysis was performed in all patients to assess MMR and p53 status. Methylation analysis was performed in MMRd patients with IHCnegative MLH1. The MMRd population was classified into: 1)MLH1-hypermethylated (MLH1-HyMet); 2)MLH1unmethylated (MLH1-UnMet); 3)IHC-negative MSH2 and/or MSH6 or PMS2 alone (non-MLH1). Results: Of 1171 patients undergoing surgical staging and IHC assessment, 362 (30.9 %) were classified as MMRd and included in the analysis. Among these, 59.7 % (n = 216) were MLH1-HyMet, 11 % (n = 40) MLH1-UnMet, and 29.3 % (n = 106) non-MLH1. Compared to MLH1-UnMet and non-MLH1, MLH1-HyMet was associated with older age, higher BMI, larger tumor size, deeper myometrial invasion, substantial lymphovascular space invasion, lower frequency of early-stage and low-risk disease. EFS was similar when comparing the MMRd subtypes, even after adjusting for stage and tumor histology. However, a trend of MLH1-HyMet toward poorer prognosis can be observed, particularly in the advanced/metastatic setting. Conclusions: MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd ECs display more aggressive clinicopathologic features compared to the other MMRd subgroups. However, although a suggestive trend toward poorer EFS was observed in the hypermethylated subset, particularly in the advanced setting, no significant differences in prognosis were detected among the MMRd subtypes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Somatic tumor profiling of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficient endometrial cancers (EC).
    Cadoo, Karen Anne
    DeLair, Deborah
    Mandelker, Diana
    Trottier, Magan
    Stewart, Carolyn
    Tran, Christina
    Kernel, Yelena
    Walsh, Michael Francis
    Scharf, Felicia
    Hyman, David Michael
    Joseph, Vijai
    Robson, Mark E.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem
    Offit, Kenneth
    Solit, David B.
    Berger, Michael F.
    Aghajanian, Carol
    Stadler, Zsofia Kinga
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [2] Substratification of mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) endometrial cancers can provide prognostic and predictive refinement
    Jamieson, Amy
    Pors, Jennifer
    Leung, Samuel
    Chiu, Derek
    Kommoss, Stefan
    Talhouk, Aline
    Huntsman, David G.
    Singh, Naveena
    Gilks, Blake
    McAlpine, Jessica N.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (05)
  • [3] TIM-3 in endometrial carcinomas: an immunotherapeutic target expressed by mismatch repair-deficient and intact cancers
    Moore, Margaret
    Ring, Kari L.
    Mills, Anne M.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32 (08) : 1168 - 1179
  • [4] The role of ribosomal protein L22 in regulating the immune landscape in mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancers
    Osborne, Macy L.
    Atkins, Hannah
    Gladden, Andrew B.
    Broaddus, Russell R.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (05)
  • [5] Association of tumour morphology with mismatch-repair protein status in endometrial cancers: a single unit experience
    Di Nanni, D. D.
    De Leo, A.
    Ceccarelli, C.
    Perrone, A. M.
    De Iaco, P.
    Santini, D.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2018, 473 : S34 - S34
  • [6] Outcomes of DNA repair-deficient pancreatic cancers: KU Cancer Center experience
    Kasi, Anup
    Bajwa, Suhaib
    Al-Jumayli, Mohammed
    Saeed, Anwaar
    Godwin, Andrew
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (24)
  • [7] Retrospective analysis of etiopathogenesis of all cases of endophthalmitis at a large tertiary referral center
    Karacal H.
    Kymes S.M.
    Apte R.S.
    International Ophthalmology, 2007, 27 (4) : 251 - 259
  • [8] Pembrolizumab in metastatic mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer: the beginning of a journey into the land of immunotherapies for all cancers Comment
    Grothey, Axel
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022,
  • [9] Immunotherapy in advanced mismatch repair deficiency endometrial cancer: A real-world single center experience
    Rauthan, A.
    Murthy, N. Y.
    Patil, P.
    Prasannakumar, S. Sampige
    Zaveri, S.
    Ashwath, R.
    Vundemodalu, P.
    Jomi, C.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S1513 - S1513
  • [10] The utility of evaluating mismatch repair proteins in endometrial carcinoma: an experience from a tertiary referral centre in North India
    Jain, Ekta
    Prasad, Sarita
    Dhar, Aparna
    Kini, Lata
    Sharma, Shivani
    Dewan, Aditi
    PATHOLOGICA, 2021, 113 (02) : 115 - 120