Ecosystem-based adaptation strategies to multi-hazard risk reduction and policy implications in the Pearl River and Yangtze River deltas, China

被引:1
作者
Peng, Yuting [1 ]
Welden, Natalie A. [1 ]
Renaud, Fabrice G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Social & Environm Sustainabil, Crichton Campus,Rutherford McCowan Bldg, Dumfries DG1 4ZL, Scotland
关键词
Ecosystem services; Disaster risk reduction; Climate change adaptation; Risk assessment; Vulnerability; Environmental policies; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; SPATIAL ASSESSMENT; FLOOD RISKS; SERVICES; SUSTAINABILITY; OPPORTUNITIES; VULNERABILITY; BIODIVERSITY; RESTORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105053
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
There is growing interest in ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) as an approach for climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction (DRR), and the achievement of sustainable development goals. In this study, EbA is synonymous with ecosystem-based DRR for climate-related risk reduction and aligns with nature-based solutions designed for climate change adaptation. Its practice emphasizes the co-benefits of ecosystem protection and restoration, such as reduced exposure to various natural hazards, reduced vulnerability, and enhanced livelihood resilience. Establishing localized EbA initiatives to effectively respond to climate change requires an integrated assessment encompassing the understanding of dynamics of the local social-ecological system. Here, we use two risk assessment frameworks that comprehensively consider social and ecological dimensions of risk. The Global Delta Risk Index (GDRI) addresses social susceptibility, coping and adaptive capacity, ecosystem susceptibility and ecosystem robustness as core components of vulnerability. The DELTA-ES-SES framework, which is derived from the GDRI, additionally considers the intensity of multiple hazards and the importance of ecosystem services in reducing disaster risks. Using both frameworks, we (1) map high disaster risk areas in the Pearl River and Yangtze River deltas, (2) analyse regional differences in vulnerability and risk levels caused by different risk components within deltas, (3) identify key ecosystem services that relate to disaster risk, (4) outline EbA designs applicable to priority regions, and (5) provide policy suggestions for future plans. In doing so, we highlight the linkages between ecosystem services, current EbA practices, and global/national policies to promote the success of EbA in regions exposed to natural hazards.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Assessing Multi-Hazard Vulnerability and Dynamic Coastal Flood Risk in the Mississippi Delta: The Global Delta Risk Index as a Social-Ecological Systems Approach [J].
Anderson, Carl C. ;
Renaud, Fabrice G. ;
Hagenlocher, Michael ;
Day, John W. .
WATER, 2021, 13 (04)
[2]   Comparing index-based vulnerability assessments in the Mississippi Delta: Implications of contrasting theories, indicators, and aggregation methodologies [J].
Anderson, Carl C. ;
Hagenlocher, Michael ;
Renaud, Fabrice G. ;
Sebesvari, Zita ;
Cutter, Susan L. ;
Emrich, Christopher T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2019, 39
[3]   Urban resilience against natural disasters: Mapping the risk with an innovative indicators-based assessment approach [J].
Anelli, Debora ;
Tajani, Francesco ;
Ranieri, Rossana .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 371
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, P321, DOI [10.1017/9781009157964.006, DOI 10.1017/9781009157964.006, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.006]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Integrated Management Plan of Key Watershed Water Resources (2021-2025)
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GADM database of Global Administrative Areas
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Human cost of Disasters, DOI DOI 10.18356/79B92774-EN
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, The New Urban Agenda