Estimation of geothermal temperature and gradient using inversion of transient wellbore temperature measurements

被引:0
作者
Chekhonin, E. M. [1 ]
Akchurin, R. Z. [2 ]
Ramazanov, A. Sh. [2 ]
Popov, Y. A. [1 ]
Valiullin, R. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Skolkovo Inst Sci & Technol, 30-1 Bolshoy Blvd, Moscow 121205, Russia
[2] Ufa Univ Sci & Technol, 32 Zaki Validi Str, Ufa 450076, Russia
关键词
Equilibrium formation temperature; Temperature logging; Drilling schedule; Circulation; Shut-in; Transient heat transfer; Rock thermal properties; HEAT-TRANSFER; CIRCULATION; MUD; PREDICTION; MODEL; WELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.125309
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper describes the development, validation, and application of a simulator for estimating geothermal temperature and its gradient from disturbed temperature measurements along a section of a vertical or subvertical wellbore. The simulator is based on a mathematical model including transient heat transfer during drilling, circulation, cementing, and shut-in conditions in and around a wellbore. It considers the actual schedule and parameters of the well construction stages in a layered formation. Along with a critical review of existing analogue-solutions, the paper addresses the issue of completeness of the tests for such kinds of simulators, as well as the volume and the quality of the initial data required for modeling. The developed simulator was successfully tested against several known analytical and numerical solutions and applied to real field data. Parametric studies on synthetic cases allowed us to quantitatively evaluate the impact of uncertainty in drilling schedule and formation thermal properties on the reconstructed geothermal temperature and its gradient. The uncertainty in the input time-depth curve for the wellbore when the average relative difference in day-by-day drilling depth is about 11% leads to errors up to 3% and 20% in geothermal temperature and its gradient, respectively. The typical uncertainty of +/- 30% in rock thermal properties, primarily thermal conductivity, results in errors up to 2.5% and 9.3% in geothermal temperature and its gradients, respectively. It was also shown that the noise in the recorded temperature data may result in errors in geothermal temperature gradient estimation up to several percent. Developed simulator is a useful tool for the determination of geothermal temperature and its gradient, as it is important in solving fundamental and applied problems in the geothermal and petroleum industries.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Abdelhafiz M. M. E., 2022, Modelling and simulating the thermal interaction between the wellbore fluids and rock formation during drilling operations, DOI [10.21268/20220214-0, DOI 10.21268/20220214-0]
  • [2] TEMPERATURE-VARIATION IN A CIRCULATING WELLBORE FLUID
    ARNOLD, FC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1990, 112 (02): : 79 - 83
  • [3] ESTIMATION OF UNDISTURBED FORMATION TEMPERATURES UNDER SPHERICAL-RADIAL HEAT-FLOW CONDITIONS
    ASCENCIO, F
    GARCIA, A
    RIVERA, J
    ARELLANO, V
    [J]. GEOTHERMICS, 1994, 23 (04) : 317 - 326
  • [4] Estimation of static formation temperatures in geothermal wells by using an artificial neural network approach
    Bassam, A.
    Santoyo, E.
    Andaverde, J.
    Hernandez, J. A.
    Espinoza-Ojeda, O. M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2010, 36 (09) : 1191 - 1199
  • [5] Beck A., 1988, Handbook of Terrestrial Heat-Flow Density Determination: with Guidelines and Recommendations of the International Heat-Flow Commission, P59
  • [6] A CIRCULATING AND SHUT-IN WELL-TEMPERATURE-PROFILE SIMULATOR
    BEIRUTE, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 43 (09): : 1140 - 1146
  • [7] Bergman T. L., 2017, INCROPERAS PRINCIPLE, V8th
  • [8] FORMATION PRODUCTIVITY EVALUATION FROM TEMPERATURE LOGS
    BIRD, JM
    FROST, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1966, 18 (03): : 301 - &
  • [9] Blackwell D.D., 1987, Experimental Methods in Physics, Part B - Field Measurements, V24, P189
  • [10] Bullard E.C., 1947, GEOPHYS J INT, V5, P127, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1365-246X.1947.TB00348.X