The Association of Pregnancy With Outcomes Among Critically Ill Reproductive-Aged Women: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Analysis

被引:1
作者
Kohn, Rachel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ashana, Deepshikha C. [5 ]
Vranas, Kelly C. [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Viglianti, Elizabeth M. [8 ,9 ]
Hauschildt, Katrina [10 ]
Chen, Catherine [11 ]
Vail, Emily A. [2 ,4 ]
Moroz, Leslie [12 ]
Gershengorn, Hayley B. [13 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Palliat & Adv Illness Res PAIR Ctr, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med, Portland, OR USA
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Ctr Improve Vet Involvement Care, Portland, OR USA
[8] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[9] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[10] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[11] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Med, Dallas, TX USA
[12] Yale Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Haven, CT USA
[13] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Med, Miami, FL USA
[14] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Med, Bronx, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
critical care outcomes; critical illness; mechanical ventilation; pregnancy; sepsis; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; CRITICAL-CARE; PREVALENCE; MORTALITY; SEPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2024.03.030
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The maternal mortality rate in the United States is unacceptably high. However, the relative contribution of pregnancy to these outcomes is unknown. Studies comparing outcomes among pregnant vs nonpregnant critically ill patients show mixed results and are limited by small sample sizes. Research Question: What is the association of pregnancy with critical illness outcomes? Study Design and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women 18 to 55 years of age who received invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) on hospital day 0 or 1 or who demonstrated sepsis on admission (infection with organ failure) discharged from Premier Healthcare Database hospitals from 2008 through 2021. The exposure was pregnancy. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We created propensity scores for pregnancy (using patient and hospital characteristics) and performed 1:1 propensity score matching without replacement within age strata (to ensure exact age matching). We performed multilevel multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression for propensity-matched pairs with pair as a random effect. Results: Three thousand ninety-three pairs were included in the matched MV cohort, and 13,002 pairs were included in the sepsis cohort. The characteristics of both cohorts were well balanced (all standard mean differences, < 0.1). Among matched pairs, unadjusted mortality was 8.0% vs 13.8% for MV and 1.4% vs 2.3% for sepsis among pregnant and nonpregnant patients, respectively. In adjusted regression, pregnancy was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality (MV: OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.41-0.60; P < .001; sepsis: OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.67; P < .001). Interpretation: In this large US cohort, critically ill pregnant women receiving MV or with sepsis showed better survival than propensity score-matched nonpregnant women. These findings must be interpreted in the context of likely residual confounding.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 777
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Quality Indicator User Guide: Pediatric Quality Indicators (PDI), US
  • [2] Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care
    Angus, DC
    Linde-Zwirble, WT
    Lidicker, J
    Clermont, G
    Carcillo, J
    Pinsky, MR
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) : 1303 - 1310
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Specifications Manual for National Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • [5] The specification of the propensity score in multilevel observational studies
    Arpino, Bruno
    Mealli, Fabrizia
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2011, 55 (04) : 1770 - 1780
  • [6] Ashana DC, 2023, ANN AM THORAC SOC, V20, P1531, DOI 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-071RL
  • [7] Comparing apples and oranges
    Blackstone, EH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 123 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [8] Bosch NA, 2022, ANN AM THORAC SOC, V19, P861, DOI 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202110-1147RL
  • [9] Variable selection for propensity score models
    Brookhart, M. Alan
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    Rothman, Kenneth J.
    Glynn, Robert J.
    Avorn, Jerry
    Sturmer, Til
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 163 (12) : 1149 - 1156
  • [10] Implications for the pregnant patient
    Campbell, LA
    Klocke, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 163 (05) : 1051 - 1054