Use of continuous glucose monitoring and point-of-care glucose testing in hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus in non-intensive care unit settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:6
作者
Lima Chagas, Gabriel Cavalcante [1 ]
Teixeira, Larissa [2 ]
Clemente, Mariana R. C. [3 ]
Lima Chagas, Rafael Cavalcante [1 ]
Santinelli Pestana, Diego Vinicius [4 ]
Silva Sombra, Lorenna Rodrigues [5 ]
Lima, Bruno B. [6 ]
Galindo, Rodolfo J. [7 ]
Abreu, Marconi [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil
[3] Petropolis Sch Med, Petropolis, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dept Internal Med, Dallas, TX USA
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Med, Div Hosp Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Univ Miami, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Miami, FL USA
[8] Univ Texas Southwestern, Div Endocrinol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
Continuous glucose monitoring; Diabetes; Hospital; Meta-analysis; Point-of-care; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111986
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The benefits of using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in hospitalized patients with diabetes remain uncertain. Point-of-care (POC) glucose testing is the standard of care in this setting. We compared the effect of adding CGM to POC testing versus POC testing alone on glycemic outcomes in this population. We have searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, and MEDLINE databases and relevant conferences up to May 2024. We have included six randomized controlled trials (n = 979 patients) comparing CGM plus POC testing to POC testing alone in non-pregnant, non-critically ill hospitalized adults with diabetes. The addition of CGM improved time in range (mean difference [MD] + 7.24 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: +5.06, +9.42; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 35 %), reduced time below range < 70 mg/dL (MD: -1.23 %; 95 %CI: -2.27, -0.18; P = 0.02; I-2 = 64 %) and < 54 mg/dL (MD: -0.95 %; 95 %CI: -1.19, -0.70; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0 %), and time above range > 250 mg/dL (MD: -3.70 %; 95 %CI: -6.10, -1.29; P = 0.003; I-2 = 39 %) compared to POC testing alone. We observed no statistically significant differences in glycemic variability or insulin doses. In non-critically ill, hospitalized adults with diabetes, the addition of CGM to POC testing for insulin dosing resulted in superior glycemic control and reduction of hypoglycemia compared to POC testing alone.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Diabetes Technology in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Novel Indications [J].
Agarwal, Shubham ;
Galindo, Rodolfo J. ;
Shah, Amy V. ;
Abreu, Marconi .
CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2024, 24 (05) :85-95
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA, V2nd
[3]   Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections A Randomized Trial [J].
Beck, Roy W. ;
Riddlesworth, Tonya D. ;
Ruedy, Katrina ;
Ahmann, Andrew ;
Haller, Stacie ;
Kruger, Davida ;
McGill, Janet B. ;
Polonsky, William ;
Price, David ;
Aronoff, Stephen ;
Aronson, Ronnie ;
Toschi, Elena ;
Kollman, Craig ;
Bergenstal, Richard .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 167 (06) :365-+
[4]   Accuracy and Potential Interferences of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors in the Hospital [J].
Bellido, Virginia ;
Freckman, Guido ;
Perez, Antonio ;
Galindo, Rodolfo J. .
ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (11) :919-927
[5]  
Britton Katherine E, 2017, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V11, P216, DOI [10.1177/1932296816681585, 10.1177/1932296816681585]
[6]   Flash glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes managed with basal insulin in the USA: a retrospective real-world chart review study and meta-analysis [J].
Carlson, Anders L. ;
Daniel, Timothy Dilon ;
DeSantis, Andrea ;
Jabbour, Serge ;
French, Esra Karslioglu ;
Kruger, Davida ;
Miller, Eden ;
Ozer, Kerem ;
Elliott, Tom .
BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2022, 10 (01)
[7]  
Chagas G, 2024, Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Point-of-Care Testing in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus in Non-Intensive Care Unit Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
[8]  
Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), 2021, Market Report of Diabetes Self-Monitoring Devices in LMICs, P19
[9]   Remote Continuous Glucose Monitoring With a Computerized Insulin Infusion Protocol for Critically Ill Patients in a COVID-19 Medical ICU: Proof of Concept [J].
Davis, Georgia M. ;
Faulds, Eileen ;
Walker, Tara ;
Vigliotti, Debbie ;
Rabinovich, Marina ;
Hester, Joi ;
Peng, Limin ;
McLean, Barbara ;
Hannon, Patricia ;
Poindexter, Norma ;
Saunders, Petrena ;
Perez-Guzman, Citlalli ;
Tekwani, Seema S. ;
Martin, Greg S. ;
Umpierrez, Guillermo ;
Agarwal, Shivani ;
Dungan, Kathleen ;
Pasquel, Francisco J. .
DIABETES CARE, 2021, 44 (04) :1055-1058
[10]   7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025 [J].
Elsayed, Nuha A. ;
Mccoy, Rozalina G. ;
Aleppo, Grazia ;
Balapattabi, Kirthikaa ;
Beverly, Elizabeth A. ;
Early, Kathaleen Briggs ;
Bruemmer, Dennis ;
Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B. ;
Ekhlaspour, Laya ;
Garg, Rajesh ;
Khunti, Kamlesh ;
Lal, Rayhan ;
Lingvay, Ildiko ;
Matfin, Glenn ;
Pandya, Naushira ;
Pekas, Elizabeth J. ;
Pilla, Scott J. ;
Polsky, Sarit ;
Segal, Alissa R. ;
Seley, Jane Jeffrie ;
Stanton, Robert C. ;
Bannuru, Raveendhara R. .
DIABETES CARE, 2025, 48 :S146-S166