The development and validation of the Student Self-feedback Behavior Scale

被引:0
作者
Yang, Yongle [1 ]
Yan, Zi [2 ]
Zhu, Jinyu [2 ]
Guo, Wuyuan [3 ]
Wu, Junsheng [2 ]
Huang, Bingjun [2 ]
机构
[1] Jingchu Univ Technol, Sch Educ, Jingmen, Peoples R China
[2] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Haile Expt Sch, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
self-feedback behavior; scale development and validation; Chinese student; cross validation; measurement invariance; HIGHER-EDUCATION; FIT INDEXES; AGREEABLENESS; PERCEPTIONS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1495684
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Though the importance and benefits of students' active role in the feedback process have been widely discussed in the literature, an instrument for measuring students' self-feedback behavior is still lacking. This paper reports the development and validation of the Self-feedback Behavior Scale (SfBS), which comprises three dimensions (seeking, processing, and using feedback). The SfBS items were constructed in line with the self-feedback behavioral model. One thousand two hundred fifty-two high school students (Grade 10 to Grade 12) in mainland China participated in this survey. The exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor model reaffirmed in the confirmatory factor analysis. The multi-group CFA supported the measurement invariance of the SfBS across gender. Using the SfBS can help researchers and teachers better understand students' self-feedback behavior and optimize benefits derived from the self-feedback process.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PSS Practice and Statistical Thinking
[2]   FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE - PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION [J].
ASHFORD, SJ ;
CUMMINGS, LL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1983, 32 (03) :370-398
[3]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[4]   How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers [J].
Bennett, Sue ;
Dawson, Phillip ;
Bearman, Margaret ;
Molloy, Elizabeth ;
Boud, David .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 48 (02) :672-682
[5]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[6]   Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design [J].
Boud, David ;
Molloy, Elizabeth .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (06) :698-712
[7]  
Brown G.T., 2013, SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment, P367, DOI 10.4135/9781452218649.n21
[8]  
Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005, 10.1177/0049124192021002005]
[9]  
Bryman A., 2001, QUANTITATIVE DATA AN
[10]  
Byrne B.M., 1998, STRUCTURAL EQUATION, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203774762