Clinical effectiveness of progestogens compared to combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Gaio, Giovana de Souza [1 ]
Kemczenski, Frederico [1 ]
Amador, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira [2 ]
Farias, Caroline Freitas [3 ]
Chagas, Junea [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Joinvilles Reg, Dept Med, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Cajazeiras, Pe, Brazil
[3] Marilia Med Sch, Dept Med, Marilia, SP, Brazil
[4] Fac Med Sci Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
Endometriosis; Progestogens; Combined oral contraceptives; Pelvic pain; DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; PELVIC PAIN; PATHOGENESIS; DIENOGEST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.033
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Endometriosis involves the growth of endometrium-like cells outside the uterus, affecting reproductiveaged women. Symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility significantly impair quality of life. Among therapeutic options, progestogens have demonstrated efficacy in managing pain and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pills in alleviating pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and associated side effects. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with the last search conducted in October 2024. The review was registered under PROSPERO registration number CRD42024609658. Studies were included regardless of language, publication year, or country. Articles not comparing progestogens and combined oral contraceptives or lacking relevant outcomes were excluded, as were abstracts, theses, case reports, opinion pieces, and correspondence. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for randomized studies. Results: Seven studies, including 948 patients (476 receiving progestogens), met inclusion criteria. The metaanalysis found no significant differences between progestogens and COCPs for pelvic pain (SMD = 0.02; 95 % CI: -0.37 to 0.40; P = 0.04; I2 = 66.7 %), dysmenorrhea (SMD = 0.00; 95 % CI: -0.19 to 0.19), dyspareunia (SMD = 0.21; 95 % CI: -0.42 to 0.85; P = 0.02; I2 = 81.4 %), or psychological health (SMD = 0.01; 95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.23; P = 0.19; I2 = 39.1 %). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in side effects, including breast tenderness, weight gain, amenorrhea, and bleeding. Conclusion: Progestogens and COCPs demonstrate comparable efficacy in managing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and psychological health, with similar side effect profiles. These findings suggest both treatments are equally effective options for symptom management in endometriosis.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 225
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Salvia miltiorrhiza-Containing Chinese Herbal Medicine Combined With GnRH Agonist for Postoperative Treatment of Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis [J].
Gao, Qiang ;
Shen, Lei ;
Jiang, Bei ;
Luan, Yi-feng ;
Lin, Li-na ;
Meng, Fan-ci ;
Wang, Chao-ying ;
Cong, Hui-fang .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
[42]   Comparing the Efficacy of Surgery and Medical Therapy for Pain Management in Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Chaichian, Shahla ;
Kabir, Ali ;
Mehdizadehkashi, Abolfazl ;
Rahmani, Khaled ;
Moghimi, Mehrdad ;
Moazzami, Bahram .
PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2017, 20 (03) :185-195
[43]   Acupuncture for clinical improvement of endometriosis-related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Cong ;
Li, Xuhao ;
Lu, Shiyou ;
Yang, Jiguo ;
Liu, Yuanxiang .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (04) :2101-2114
[44]   Comparison of dienogest versus combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of women with adenomyosis: A randomized clinical trial [J].
Hassanin, Ahmed, I ;
Youssef, Ahmed A. ;
Yousef, Asmaa M. ;
Ali, Mohammed K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 154 (02) :263-269
[45]   The clinical effectiveness and safety of alprostadil combined with alpha lipoic acid in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Guan, Hailian ;
Ye, Miaomiao ;
Fang, Cao ;
Zhang, Limin ;
Han, Pengding ;
Qiu, Shiguang ;
Fang, Xiangyu ;
Li, Lanying .
MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (50) :E23507
[46]   Evaluation of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessment of the quality of life of endometriosis patients undergoing treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Sima, Romina-Marina ;
Ples, Liana ;
Socea, Bogdan ;
Sklavounos, Panagiotis ;
Negoi, Ionut ;
Stanescu, Anca-Daniela ;
Iordache, Ioan-Iulian ;
Hamoud, Bashar Haj ;
Radosa, Marc Phillip ;
Juhasz-Boess, Ingolf ;
Solomayer, Erich Franz ;
Dimitriu, Mihai C. T. ;
Cirstoveanu, Catalin ;
Serban, Dragos ;
Radosa, Julia Caroline .
EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (05)
[47]   Dienogest and the Risk of Endometriosis Recurrence Following Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Zakhari, Andrew ;
Edwards, Darl ;
Ryu, Michelle ;
Matelski, John J. ;
Bougie, Olga ;
Murji, Ally .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (07) :1503-1510
[48]   Pretreatment of Dienogest for women with endometriosis in in vitro Fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Li, Xueying ;
Lin, Jinli ;
Zhang, Linhao ;
Liu, Yao .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2023, 88 (03) :135-142
[49]   The role of metformin in the management of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhang, Heling ;
Liu, Fang ;
Huang, Yanzhen ;
Liu, Wei .
TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 22 (05) :1115-1120
[50]   Endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Francesca Chiaffarino ;
Sonia Cipriani ;
Elena Ricci ;
Paola Agnese Mauri ;
Giovanna Esposito ;
Marta Barretta ;
Paolo Vercellini ;
Fabio Parazzini .
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 303 :17-25