Clinical effectiveness of progestogens compared to combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Gaio, Giovana de Souza [1 ]
Kemczenski, Frederico [1 ]
Amador, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira [2 ]
Farias, Caroline Freitas [3 ]
Chagas, Junea [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Joinvilles Reg, Dept Med, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Cajazeiras, Pe, Brazil
[3] Marilia Med Sch, Dept Med, Marilia, SP, Brazil
[4] Fac Med Sci Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
Endometriosis; Progestogens; Combined oral contraceptives; Pelvic pain; DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; PELVIC PAIN; PATHOGENESIS; DIENOGEST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.033
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Endometriosis involves the growth of endometrium-like cells outside the uterus, affecting reproductiveaged women. Symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility significantly impair quality of life. Among therapeutic options, progestogens have demonstrated efficacy in managing pain and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pills in alleviating pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and associated side effects. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with the last search conducted in October 2024. The review was registered under PROSPERO registration number CRD42024609658. Studies were included regardless of language, publication year, or country. Articles not comparing progestogens and combined oral contraceptives or lacking relevant outcomes were excluded, as were abstracts, theses, case reports, opinion pieces, and correspondence. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for randomized studies. Results: Seven studies, including 948 patients (476 receiving progestogens), met inclusion criteria. The metaanalysis found no significant differences between progestogens and COCPs for pelvic pain (SMD = 0.02; 95 % CI: -0.37 to 0.40; P = 0.04; I2 = 66.7 %), dysmenorrhea (SMD = 0.00; 95 % CI: -0.19 to 0.19), dyspareunia (SMD = 0.21; 95 % CI: -0.42 to 0.85; P = 0.02; I2 = 81.4 %), or psychological health (SMD = 0.01; 95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.23; P = 0.19; I2 = 39.1 %). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in side effects, including breast tenderness, weight gain, amenorrhea, and bleeding. Conclusion: Progestogens and COCPs demonstrate comparable efficacy in managing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and psychological health, with similar side effect profiles. These findings suggest both treatments are equally effective options for symptom management in endometriosis.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 225
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Physical activity and endometriosis risk in women with infertility or pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ricci, Elena
    Vigano, Paola
    Cipriani, Sonia
    Chiaffarino, Francesca
    Bianchi, Stefano
    Rebonato, Giorgia
    Parazzini, Fabio
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (40)
  • [32] Endometriosis and cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    do Couto, Celina Poeta
    Policiano, Catarina
    Pinto, Fausto J.
    Brito, Dulce
    Caldeira, Daniel
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2023, 171 : 45 - 52
  • [33] Endometriosis and obstetrics complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zullo, Fabrizio
    Spagnolo, Emanuela
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Acunzo, Miriam
    Xodo, Serena
    Ceccaroni, Marcello
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (04) : 667 - +
  • [34] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incidence and Prevalence of Endometriosis
    Sarria-Santamera, Antonio
    Orazumbekova, Binur
    Terzic, Milan
    Issanov, Alpamys
    Chaowen, Chen
    Asunsolo-del-Barco, Angel
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [35] Long COVID and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alexandre Vallée
    Maxence Arutkin
    Pierre-François Ceccaldi
    Anis Feki
    Jean-Marc Ayoubi
    [J]. BMC Women's Health, 25 (1)
  • [36] The association between endometriosis and autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shigesi, Nina
    Kvaskoff, Marina
    Kirtley, Shona
    Feng, Qian
    Fang, Hai
    Knight, Julian C.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Rahmioglu, Nilufer
    Zondervan, Krina T.
    Becker, Christian M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2019, 25 (04) : 486 - 503
  • [37] Efficacy of Dienogest for Prevention of Endometriosis Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Assiri, Hussain M. A.
    Alomari, Mashail A. S.
    Alshehri, Atheer D. M.
    Alahmari, Asma S. Y.
    Alasmari, Manal M.
    [J]. WORLD FAMILY MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (11): : 165 - 171
  • [38] Adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with endometriosis:a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jian-Qing
    Zhang, Jia-Miao
    Qian, Bin
    [J]. GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2024, 95 (09) : 668 - 676
  • [39] Salvia miltiorrhiza-Containing Chinese Herbal Medicine Combined With GnRH Agonist for Postoperative Treatment of Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis
    Gao, Qiang
    Shen, Lei
    Jiang, Bei
    Luan, Yi-feng
    Lin, Li-na
    Meng, Fan-ci
    Wang, Chao-ying
    Cong, Hui-fang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [40] Acupuncture for clinical improvement of endometriosis-related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Cong
    Li, Xuhao
    Lu, Shiyou
    Yang, Jiguo
    Liu, Yuanxiang
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (04) : 2101 - 2114