Clinical effectiveness of progestogens compared to combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Gaio, Giovana de Souza [1 ]
Kemczenski, Frederico [1 ]
Amador, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira [2 ]
Farias, Caroline Freitas [3 ]
Chagas, Junea [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Joinvilles Reg, Dept Med, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Cajazeiras, Pe, Brazil
[3] Marilia Med Sch, Dept Med, Marilia, SP, Brazil
[4] Fac Med Sci Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
Endometriosis; Progestogens; Combined oral contraceptives; Pelvic pain; DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; PELVIC PAIN; PATHOGENESIS; DIENOGEST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.033
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Endometriosis involves the growth of endometrium-like cells outside the uterus, affecting reproductiveaged women. Symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility significantly impair quality of life. Among therapeutic options, progestogens have demonstrated efficacy in managing pain and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pills in alleviating pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and associated side effects. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with the last search conducted in October 2024. The review was registered under PROSPERO registration number CRD42024609658. Studies were included regardless of language, publication year, or country. Articles not comparing progestogens and combined oral contraceptives or lacking relevant outcomes were excluded, as were abstracts, theses, case reports, opinion pieces, and correspondence. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for randomized studies. Results: Seven studies, including 948 patients (476 receiving progestogens), met inclusion criteria. The metaanalysis found no significant differences between progestogens and COCPs for pelvic pain (SMD = 0.02; 95 % CI: -0.37 to 0.40; P = 0.04; I2 = 66.7 %), dysmenorrhea (SMD = 0.00; 95 % CI: -0.19 to 0.19), dyspareunia (SMD = 0.21; 95 % CI: -0.42 to 0.85; P = 0.02; I2 = 81.4 %), or psychological health (SMD = 0.01; 95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.23; P = 0.19; I2 = 39.1 %). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in side effects, including breast tenderness, weight gain, amenorrhea, and bleeding. Conclusion: Progestogens and COCPs demonstrate comparable efficacy in managing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and psychological health, with similar side effect profiles. These findings suggest both treatments are equally effective options for symptom management in endometriosis.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 225
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of endometriosis with dienogest in combination with traditional Chinese medicine: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Yu'e
    Liu, Yujie
    Jia, Huanhuan
    Luo, Chao
    Chen, Huan
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [22] Influence of race/ethnicity on prevalence and presentation of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bougie, O.
    Yap, Ma. I.
    Sikora, L.
    Flaxman, T.
    Singh, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (09) : 1104 - 1115
  • [23] The association between endometriosis and migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Giorgia Elisabeth Colombo
    Sofia Makieva
    Edgardo Somigliana
    Georgios Schoretsanitis
    Brigitte Leeners
    Christian Polli
    Noemi Salmeri
    Dimitrios Rafail Kalaitzopoulos
    Paola Vigano’
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 26 (1)
  • [24] Vitamin D status in endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiu, Yichao
    Yuan, Shuang
    Wang, Hongjing
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2020, 302 (01) : 141 - 152
  • [25] Prevalence of endometriosis in Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome variants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vercellini, Paolo
    Caprara, Francesca
    Piccini, Martina
    Donati, Agnese
    Vigano, Paola
    Somigliana, Edgardo
    Cipriani, Sonia
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2025,
  • [26] Surgery for Endometriosis Improves Major Domains of Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lins Arcoverde, Fernanda Vieira
    Andres, Marina de Paula
    Borrelli, Giuliano Moyses
    Barbosa, Priscila de Almeida
    Abrao, Mauricio Simoes
    Kho, Rosanne Marie
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 266 - 278
  • [27] Physical activity and endometriosis risk in women with infertility or pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ricci, Elena
    Vigano, Paola
    Cipriani, Sonia
    Chiaffarino, Francesca
    Bianchi, Stefano
    Rebonato, Giorgia
    Parazzini, Fabio
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (40)
  • [28] Psychological stress levels in women with endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Brasil, Diogo L.
    Montagna, Erik
    Trevisan, Camila M.
    La Rosa, Valentina Lucia
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Barbosa, Caio P.
    Bianco, Bianca
    Zaia, Victor
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2020, 111 (01) : 90 - 102
  • [29] Sexual Activity during Menstruation as A Risk Factor for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mollazadeh, Sanaz
    Najmabadi, Khadijeh Mirzaii
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    Roudsari, Robab Latifnejad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2023, 17 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [30] The efficacy and safety of Kuntai capsule combined with leuprorelin acetate in the treatment of endometriosis A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Shuzhen
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Jing
    An, Wei
    Jia, Li
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (11) : E25080