Clinical effectiveness of progestogens compared to combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Gaio, Giovana de Souza [1 ]
Kemczenski, Frederico [1 ]
Amador, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira [2 ]
Farias, Caroline Freitas [3 ]
Chagas, Junea [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Joinvilles Reg, Dept Med, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Cajazeiras, Pe, Brazil
[3] Marilia Med Sch, Dept Med, Marilia, SP, Brazil
[4] Fac Med Sci Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
Endometriosis; Progestogens; Combined oral contraceptives; Pelvic pain; DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; PELVIC PAIN; PATHOGENESIS; DIENOGEST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.033
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Endometriosis involves the growth of endometrium-like cells outside the uterus, affecting reproductiveaged women. Symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility significantly impair quality of life. Among therapeutic options, progestogens have demonstrated efficacy in managing pain and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pills in alleviating pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and associated side effects. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with the last search conducted in October 2024. The review was registered under PROSPERO registration number CRD42024609658. Studies were included regardless of language, publication year, or country. Articles not comparing progestogens and combined oral contraceptives or lacking relevant outcomes were excluded, as were abstracts, theses, case reports, opinion pieces, and correspondence. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for randomized studies. Results: Seven studies, including 948 patients (476 receiving progestogens), met inclusion criteria. The metaanalysis found no significant differences between progestogens and COCPs for pelvic pain (SMD = 0.02; 95 % CI: -0.37 to 0.40; P = 0.04; I2 = 66.7 %), dysmenorrhea (SMD = 0.00; 95 % CI: -0.19 to 0.19), dyspareunia (SMD = 0.21; 95 % CI: -0.42 to 0.85; P = 0.02; I2 = 81.4 %), or psychological health (SMD = 0.01; 95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.23; P = 0.19; I2 = 39.1 %). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in side effects, including breast tenderness, weight gain, amenorrhea, and bleeding. Conclusion: Progestogens and COCPs demonstrate comparable efficacy in managing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and psychological health, with similar side effect profiles. These findings suggest both treatments are equally effective options for symptom management in endometriosis.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 225
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral contraceptive pills for endometriosis after conservative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Lixia
    Wu, Qianyu
    Liu, Lan
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 29 (10) : 883 - 890
  • [2] Meta-analysis and network pharmacology studies of the clinical efficacy of Guizhi Fuling capsules/pills combined with dienogest in treating endometriosis
    Qin, Yajie
    Yang, Xiaotian
    Zhao, Qi
    Tang, Xingran
    Zhao, Huijin
    Jiao, Yang
    Zhou, Huifang
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (49)
  • [3] A comparison of progestogens or oral contraceptives and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review
    Jeng, Cherng-Jye
    Chuang, Linus
    Shen, Jenta
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2014, 15 (06) : 767 - 773
  • [4] Effectiveness and acceptability of progestogens in combined oral contraceptives - A systematic review
    Kulier R.
    Helmerhorst F.M.
    Maitra N.
    Metin Gülmezoglu A.
    Reproductive Health, 1 (1)
  • [5] Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luiz Paulo de Souza Pinto
    Gustavo Ferrari
    Isis Kelly dos Santos
    Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Roesler
    Izabelle de Mello Gindri
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 307 : 21 - 37
  • [6] Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Souza Pinto, Luiz Paulo
    Ferrari, Gustavo
    Dos Santos, Isis Kelly
    de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo
    Gindri, Izabelle de Mello
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2023, 307 (01) : 21 - 37
  • [7] Oral contraceptives and risk of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vercellini, Paolo
    Eskenazi, Brenda
    Consonni, Dorio
    Somigliana, Edgardo
    Parazzini, Fabio
    Abbiati, Annalisa
    Fedele, Luigi
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2011, 17 (02) : 159 - 170
  • [8] Effectiveness of psychological interventions in endometriosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    del Pino-Sedeno, Tasmania
    Cabrera-Maroto, Maria
    Abrante-Luis, Alejandra
    Gonzalez-Hernandez, Yadira
    Ortiz Herrera, M. Caridad
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [9] The role of acupuncture in the treatment of women with pain in endometriosis A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yan, Qin
    Li, Jing
    Zeng, Jing
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (49)
  • [10] Neuropelveology for Endometriosis Management: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis
    Allahqoli, Leila
    Hakimi, Sevil
    Momenimovahed, Zohre
    Mazidimoradi, Afrooz
    Rezaei, Fatemeh
    Aghamohammadi, Seyedeh Zahra
    Rahmani, Azam
    Mansouri, Ghazal
    Hadavandsiri, Fatemeh
    Salehiniya, Hamid
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (16)