The manifestation of institutional bricolage and community forest management outcomes: insights from four socio-ecological settings in Nepal

被引:0
作者
Charmakar, Shambhu [1 ,2 ]
Kimengsi, Jude Ndzifon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Giessen, Lukas [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Forest Inst & Int Dev FIID Res Grp, Room 0-05,Pienner Str 7, D-01737 Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Environm Sci, Trop & Int Forestry, Dresden, Germany
[3] Univ Bamenda, Dept Geog, Bamenda, Cameroon
关键词
Forest resource appropriation; aggregation; alteration; erosion; community forests; critical institutionalism; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; IMPLEMENTATION; GOVERNANCE; LANDSCAPE; EQUITY; CASTE;
D O I
10.1080/1747423X.2024.2416000
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Institutional bricolage has gained attention in the global south, albeit limited evidence in community forestry. This study characterizes forest resource appropriation practices, analyzes bricolage manifestations around timber and NTFPs, and assesses their outcomes across four regions of Nepal. Using 342 semi-structured interviews, 38 focus group discussions, 61 key informant interviews, and policy document reviews, the findings reveal: (i) geographic variations in resource appropriation practices, with selection felling prevalent in the Mountains and an irregular shelter-wood system in the Terai; (ii) aggregation and articulation were common in the mountains for subsistence products, while alteration was more prevalent in the Terai for commercial products; and (iii) aggregation and alteration yielded mixed outcomes, whereas erosion consistently led to negative outcomes. This study advances critical institutionalism by highlighting how these bricolage processes manifest and shape forest management outcomes in Nepal. We call for further studies on the socio-political determinants of institutional bricolage manifestations.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 303
页数:26
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Acharya RP, 2015, INT FOREST REV, V17, P1
  • [2] Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation - An analysis of publications
    Acharya, Ram Prasad
    Maraseni, Tek
    Cockfield, Geoff
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [3] Poverty, property rights and collective action: understanding the distributive aspects of common property resource management
    Adhikari, H
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 10 : 7 - 31
  • [4] Angelsen A., 2011, Measuring livelihoods and environmental dependence:methods for research and fieldwork
  • [5] Community Forest Management: An Assessment and Explanation of its Performance Through QCA
    Arts, Bas
    de Koning, Jessica
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 96 : 315 - 325
  • [6] Factors Contributing to the Decline of Traditional Practices in Communities from the Gwallek-Kedar area, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal
    Atreya, Kishor
    Pyakurel, Dipesh
    Thagunna, Krishna Singh
    Bhatta, Laxmi Dutt
    Uprety, Yadav
    Chaudhary, Ram Prasad
    Oli, Bishwa Nath
    Rimal, Sagar Kumar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 61 (05) : 741 - 755
  • [7] Ecological and economical sustainability assessment of community forest management in Nepal: A reality check
    Baral, Sony
    Gautam, Ambika Prasad
    Vacik, Harald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2018, 37 (08) : 820 - 841
  • [8] Forest Management Plans in Nepal's Community Forests: Does One Size Fit All?
    Baral, Srijana
    Hansen, Christian Pilegaard
    Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal
    [J]. SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2020, 19 (04) : 483 - 504
  • [9] Re-centralisation through fake Scientificness: The case of community forestry in Nepal
    Basnyat, Bijendra
    Treue, Thorsten
    Pokharel, Ridish Kumar
    Baral, Srijana
    Rumba, Yam Bahadur
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 115
  • [10] Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries
    Baynes, Jack
    Herbohn, John
    Smith, Carl
    Fisher, Robert
    Bray, David
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2015, 35 : 226 - 238